Electrically evoked compound action potential measures for virtual channels versus physical electrodes

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 323-330

  Hughes, Michelle L ^a   Goulson, Adam M ^b  

^a BOYS TOWN NATIONAL RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COCHLEA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PHYSIOLOGY;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADULT; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; PITCH PERCEPTION;

EID: 79955546175     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182008c56     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abbas, P. J., Brown, C. J., Shallop, J. K., et al. (1999). Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear, 20, 45-59. (Pubitemid 29072423)
2. Abbas, P. J., Hughes, M. L., Brown, C. J., et al. (2004). Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potential. Audiol Neurotol, 9, 203-213. (Pubitemid 38812968)
3. Bonham, B. H., amp; Litvak, L. M. (2008). Current focusing and steering: Modeling, physiology, and psychophysics. Hear Res, 242, 141-153.
4. Brown, C. J., Abbas, P. J., Gantz, B. J. (1998). Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. Am J Otol, 19, 320-327.
5. Busby, P. A., Battmer, R. D., Pesch, J. (2008). Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant. Ear Hear, 29, 853-864.
6. Busby, P. A., amp; Plant, K. L. (2005). Dual electrode stimulation using the Nucleus CI24RE cochlear implant: Electrode impedance and pitch ranking studies. Ear Hear, 26, 504-511. (Pubitemid 41510895)
7. Choi, C. T. M., amp; Hsu, C.-H. (2009). Conditions for generating virtual channels in cochlear prosthesis systems. Ann Biomed Eng, 37, 614-624.
8. Cohen, L. T., Richardson, L. M., Saunders, E., et al. (2003). Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: Comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking. Hear Res, 179, 72-87. (Pubitemid 36547892)
9. Dillier, N., Lai, W. K., Almqvist, B., et al. (2002). Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural response telemetry system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 111, 407-414. (Pubitemid 34522325)
10. Donaldson, G. S., Kreft, H. A., Litvak, L. M. (2005). Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 623-626. (Pubitemid 41129200)
11. Firszt, J. B., Burton-Koch, D., Downing, M., et al. (2007). Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol, 28, 629-636. (Pubitemid 47229708)
12. Frijns, J. H. M., Kalkman, R. K., VanPoucke, F. J., et al. (2009). Simultaneous and non-simultaneous dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants: Evidence for two neural response modalities. Acta Otolaryngol, 129, 433-439.
13. Hughes, M. L., amp; Abbas, P. J. (2006a). The relation between electrophysiological channel interaction and electrode pitch ranking in cochlear implant recipients. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 1527-1537. (Pubitemid 43326022)
14. Hughes, M. L., amp; Abbas, P. J. (2006b). Electrophysiological channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 1538-1547. (Pubitemid 43326023)
15. Hughes, M. L., amp; Stille, L. J. (2008). Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants. Ear Hear, 29, 435-452. (Pubitemid 351652238)
16. Hughes, M. L., amp; Stille, L. J. (2009). Psychophysical and physiological measures of electrical-field interaction in cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 247-260.
17. Koch, D. B., Downing, M., Osberger, M. J., et al. (2007). Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users. Ear Hear, 28, 38S-41S. (Pubitemid 46673656)
18. Kwon, B. J., amp; van den Honert, C. (2006). Dual-electrode pitch discrimination with sequential interleaved stimulation by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, EL1-EL6.
19. Landsberger, D. M., amp; Srinivasan, A. G. (2009). Virtual channel discrimination is improved by current focusing in cochlear implant recipients. Hear Res, 254, 34-41.
20. McDermott, H. J., amp; McKay, C. M. (1994). Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am, 96, 155-162. (Pubitemid 24209111)
21. McKay, C. M., McDermott, H. J., Clark, G. M. (1996). The perceptual dimensions of single-electrode and nonsimultaneous dual-electrode stimuli in cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am, 99, 1079-1090.
22. Morsnowski, A., Charasse, B., Collet, L., et al. (2006). Measuring the refractoriness of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. Audiol Neurotol, 11, 389-402. (Pubitemid 44610327)
23. Saoji, A. A., Litvak, L. M., Hughes, M. L. (2009). Excitation patterns in simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients. Ear Hear, 30, 559-567.
24. Shpak, T., Berlin, M., Luntz, M. (2004). Objective measurements of auditory nerve recovery function in Nucleus CI 24 implantees in relation to subjective preference of stimulation rate. Acta Otolaryngol, 124, 582-586. (Pubitemid 38858226)
25. Skinner, M. W., Holden, T. A., Whiting, B. R., et al. (2007). In vivo estimates of the position of Advanced Bionics electrode arrays in the human cochlea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, 197, 2-24.
26. Tong, Y. C., amp; Clark, G. M. (1986). Loudness summation, masking, and temporal interaction for sensations produced by electric stimulation of two sites in the human cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am, 79, 1958-1966. (Pubitemid 16034867)