Sensory quality index (SQI) for commercial food products

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 748-752

  Imm, Bue Young ^a   Lee, Ji Hye ^a   Lee, Sung Hee ^a  

^a Research Institute of Food and Culture   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Acceptability; Commercial food products; Preference; Sensory quality index

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860388910     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Al-Obaidy H.M., Khan M.A., Klein B.P. Comparison between sensory quality of freshly prepared spaghetti with meat sauce before and after hot holding on a cafeteria counter. Journal of Food Science 1984, 49:1475-1477.
2. Barbosa A., Vaz-Pires P. Quality index method (QIM): Development of a sensorial scheme for common octopus (Octopus vulgaris). Food Control 2004, 15:161-168.
3. Carlton D.K. Plant sensory evaluation within a multiplant international organization. Food Technology 1985, 39(11):130-133.
4. Chapman K.W., Grace-Martin K., Lawless H.T. Expectations and stability of preference choice. Journal of Sensory Studies 2006, 21:441-455.
5. Chapman K.W., Lawless H.T., Boor K.J. Quantitative descriptive analysis and principal component analysis for sensory characterization of ultrapasteurized milk. Journal of Dairy Science 2000, 84:12-20.
6. Costell E. A comparison of sensory methods in quality control. Food Quality and Preference 2002, 13:341-353.
7. Etaio I., Albisu M., Ojeda M., Gil P.F., Salmeron J., Perez Elortondo F.J. Sensory quality control for food certification: A case study on wine. Panel training and certification, method validation and monitoring. Food Control 2010, 21:542-548.
8. Imm B.Y., Lee J.H., Yeo I.K. Capability analysis of sensory quality of jajang sauce. Food Science & Biotechnology 2009, 18(3):745-748.
9. Imm B.Y., Shim J.Y., Imm J.Y. Relationships between sensory and instrumental hardness and the estimation of hardness specifications for commercial soybean curd. Food Science and Biotechnology 2010, 19(5):1289-1293.
10. Karoui B., Kemps B., Bamelis F., Ketelaere B.D., Decuypere E., Baerdemaeker J.D. Methods to evaluate egg freshness in research and industry: A review. European Food Research and Technology 2006, 222:727-732.
11. King, S., & Heylmun, J. (1997). Relationship between consumer acceptance and consumer/ market factors. In: Munoz (Ed.), Relating consumer, descriptive, and laboratory data (pp. 78-91). ASTM, Manual 30, USA.
12. Klosse P.R., Riga J., Cramwinckel A.B., Saris W.H.M. The formulation and evaluation of culinary success factors (CSFs) that determine the palatability of food. Food Service Technology 2004, 4:107-115.
13. Lawless H.T. Dimensions of sensory quality: A critique. Food Quality and Preference 1995, 6:191-199.
14. Lawless H.T., Heymann H. Sensory evaluation of food-principles and practices 1998, Chapman and Hall (Chapter13), New York.
15. Lee H.S., O'Mahony M. Some new approaches to consumer acceptance measurement as a guide to marketing. Food Science and Biotechnology 2007, 16(6):863-867.
16. Mastrian L.K. The sensory evaluation program within a small processing operation. Food Technology 1985, 39(11):127-129.
17. Minitab Inc. (2000). MINITAB® User's guide, Release 13.
18. Munoz A.M. Sensory evaluation in quality control: An overview, new developments and future opportunities. Food Quality and Preference 2002, 13:329-339.
19. Munoz A.M., Civille G.V., Carr B.T. Sensory evaluation in quality control 1992, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
20. Odesky S.H. Handling the neutral vote in paired comparison product testing. Journal of Marketing Research 1967, 4:199-201.
21. Pecore S., Kellen L. A consumer-focused QC/sensory program in the food industry. Food Quality and Preference 2002, 13:369-374.
22. Rutenbeck S.K. Initiating an in-plant quality control/sensory evaluation program. Food Technology 1985, 39(11):124-126.
23. Sabbag N.G., Aringoli E.E., Santiago L.G., Costa S.C., Gonzalez R.J. Quality evaluation of commercial frankfurter by deterioration index method. Journal of Food Quality 2005, 28:467-478.
24. Stone H. Sensory evaluation: Science and mythology. Food Technology 1999, 53(10):124.
25. Stone H., McDermott B.J., Sidel J.L. The importance of sensory analysis for the evaluation of quality. Food Technology 1991, 6:88-95.
26. Stone H., Sidel J.L. Sensory evaluation practices 1993, Academic Press, Inc., California, Chapter 3 and Chapter 5. 2nd ed.
27. Sveinsdottir K., Martinsdottir E., Hyldig G., Jorgensen B., Kristbergsson K. Application of quality index method (QIM) scheme in shelf-life study of farmed atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Journal of Food Science 2002, 67(4):1570-1579.
28. Vaz-Pires P., Seixas P. Development of new quality index method (QIM) schemes for cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) and broadtail shortfin squid (Illex coindetii). Food Control 2006, 17:942-949.