Supervised noun phrase coreference research: The first fifteen years

ACL 2010 - 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1396-1411

  Ng, Vincent ^a  

^a The University of Texas at Dallas   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COREFERENCE; COREFERENCE RESOLUTION; HEURISTIC APPROACH; LEARNING APPROACH; NOUN PHRASE;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS; HEURISTIC METHODS;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84860004149     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (151)

1. Chinatsu Aone and Scott William Bennett. 1995. Evaluating automated and manual acquisition of anaphora resolution strategies. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 122-129.
2. Amit Bagga and Breck Baldwin. 1998. Algorithms for scoring coreference chains. In Proceedings of the LREC Workshop on Linguistic Coreference, pages 563-566.
3. Nikhil Bansal, AvrimBlum, and Shuchi Chawla. 2002. Correlation clustering. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 238-247.
4. Catalina Barbu and Ruslan Mitkov. 2001. Evaluation tool for rule-based anaphora resolution methods. In Proceedings of the 39th AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 34-41.
5. David Bean and Ellen Riloff. 1999. Corpus-based identification of non-anaphoric noun phrases. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 373-380.
6. David Bean and Ellen Riloff. 2004. Unsupervised learning of contextual role knowledge for coreference resolution. In Human Language Technologies 2004: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics; Proceedings of the Main Conference, pages 297-304.
7. Eric Bengtson and Dan Roth. 2008. Understanding the values of features for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on EmpiricalMethods in Natural Language Processing, pages 294-303.
8. Adam L. Berger, Stephen A. Della Pietra, and Vincent J. Della Pietra. 1996. A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Computational Linguistics, 22(1):39-71.
9. Shane Bergsma and Dekang Lin. 2006. Bootstrapping path-based pronoun resolution. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 33-40.
10. Shane Bergsma, Dekang Lin, and Randy Goebel. 2008. Distributional identification of non-referential pronouns. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, pages 10-18.
11. Donna Byron. 2001. The uncommon denominator: A proposal for consistent reporting of pronoun resolution results. Computational Linguistics, 27(4):569-578.
12. Sasha Calhoun, Jean Carletta, Jason Brenier, Neil Mayo, Dan Jurafsky, Mark Steedman, and David Beaver. (in press). The NXT-format Switchboard corpus: A rich resource for investigating the syntax, semantics, pragmatics and prosody of dialogue. Language Resources and Evaluation.
13. Claire Cardie and Kiri Wagstaff. 1999. Noun phrase coreference as clustering. In Proceedings of the 1999 Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora, pages 82-89.
14. Jean Carletta. 1996. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2):249-254.
15. José Castaño, Jason Zhang, and James Pustejovsky. 2002. Anaphora resolution in biomedical literature. In Proceedings of the 2002 International Symposium on Reference Resolution.
16. Eugene Charniak and Micha Elsner. 2009. EM works for pronoun anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 148-156.
17. Eugene Charniak. 1972. Towards a Model of Children's Story Comphrension. AI-TR 266, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.
18. Colin Cherry and Shane Bergsma. 2005. An expectation maximization approach to pronoun resolution. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 88-95.
19. Noam Chomsky. 1988. Language and Problems of Knowledge. The Managua Lectures. MIT Press, Cambridge,Massachusetts.
20. William Cohen. 1995. Fast effective rule induction. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 115-123.
21. Dennis Connolly, John D. Burger, and David S. Day. 1994. A machine learning approach to anaphoric reference. In Proceedings of International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing, pages 255-261.
22. Dennis Connolly, John D. Burger, and David S. Day. 1997. A machine learning approach to anaphoric reference. In D. Jones and H. Somers, editors, New Methods in Language Processing, pages 133-144. UCL Press.
23. Susan Converse. 2006. Pronominal Anaphora Resolution in Chinese. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania, USA.
24. Aron Culotta, Michael Wick, and Andrew McCallum. 2007. First-order probabilistic models for coreference resolution. In Human Language Technologies 2007: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics; Proceedings of the Main Conference, pages 81-88.
25. Walter Daelemans and Antal Van den Bosch. 2005. Memory-Based Language Processing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
26. Ido Dagan and Alon Itai. 1990. Automatic processing of large corpora for the resolution of anaphora references. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 330-332.
27. Hal Daumé III and Daniel Marcu. 2005. A largescale exploration of effective global features for a joint entity detection and tracking model. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 97-104.
28. Arthur Dempster. 1968. A generalization of Bayesian inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 30:205-247.
29. Pascal Denis and Jason Baldridge. 2007a. Global, joint determination of anaphoricity and coreference resolution using integer programming. In Human Language Technologies 2007: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics; Proceedings of theMain Conference, pages 236-243.
30. Pascal Denis and Jason Baldridge. 2007b. A ranking approach to pronoun resolution. In Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1588-1593.
31. Pascal Denis and Jason Baldridge. 2008. Specialized models and ranking for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 660-669.
32. Richard Evans. 2001. Applying machine learning toward an automatic classification of it. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 16(1):45-57.
33. Jenny Rose Finkel and Christopher Manning. 2008. Enforcing transitivity in coreference resolution. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, Short Papers, pages 45-48.
34. Thomas Finley and Thorsten Joachims. 2005. Supervised clustering with support vector machines. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 217-224.
35. Yoav Freund and Robert E. Schapire. 1999. Large margin classification using the perceptron algorithm. Machine Learning, 37(3):277-296.
36. Nikesh Garera and David Yarowsky. 2006. Resolving and generating definite anaphora by modeling hypernymy using unlabeled corpora. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 37-44.
37. Niyu Ge, John Hale, and Eugene Charniak. 1998. A statistical approach to anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Very Large Corpora, pages 161-170.
38. Barbara J. Grosz and Candace L. Sidner. 1986. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3):175-204.
39. Barbara J. Grosz, Aravind K. Joshi, and Scott Weinstein. 1983. Providing a unified account of definite noun phrases in discourse. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 44-50.
40. Barbara J. Grosz, Aravind K. Joshi, and Scott Weinstein. 1995. Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2):203-226.
41. Barbara J. Grosz. 1977. The representation and use of focus in a system for understanding dialogs. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 67-76.
42. Aria Haghighi and Dan Klein. 2007. Unsupervised coreference resolution in a nonparametric bayesian model. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 848-855.
43. Aria Haghighi and Dan Klein. 2009. Simple coreference resolution with rich syntactic and semantic features. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1152-1161.
44. Aria Haghighi and Dan Klein. 2010. Coreference resolution in a modular, entity-centered model. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
45. Jan Hajič, Jarmila Panevová, Eva Hajičová, Jarmila Panevová, Petr Sgall, Petr Pajas, Jan Stěpánek, Jiří Havelka, and Marie Mikulová. 2006. The Prague Dependency Treebank 2.0. In Linguistic Data Consortium.
46. Sanda Harabagiu, Rǎzvan Bunescu, and Steven Maiorano. 2001. Text and knowledgemining for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 55-62.
47. Laura Hasler, Constantin Orasan, and Karin Naumann. 2006. NPs for events: Experiments in coreference annotation. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 1167-1172.
48. Peter Heeman and James Allen. 1995. The TRAINS spoken dialog corpus. CD-ROM, Linguistic Data Consortium.
49. Graeme Hirst. 1981. Discourse-oriented anaphora resolution in natural language understanding: A review. American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 7(2):85-98.
50. Jerry Hobbs. 1978. Resolving pronoun references. Lingua, 44:311-338.
51. Véronique Hoste and Walter Daelemans. 2005. Comparing learning approaches to coreference resolution. There is more to it than bias. In Proceedings of the ICML Workshop on Meta-Learning.
52. Véronique Hoste. 2005. Optimization Issues in Machine Learning of Coreference Resolution. Ph.D. thesis, University of Antewerp, Belgium.
53. Eduard Hovy, Mitchell Marcus, Martha Palmer, Lance Ramshaw, and RalphWeischedel. 2006. Ontonotes: The 90% solution. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, Companion Volume: Short Papers, pages 57-60.
54. Zhiheng Huang, Guangping Zeng, Weiqun Xu, and Asli Celikyilmaz. 2009. Accurate semantic class classifier for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1232-1240.
55. Nancy Ide and Dan Cristea. 2000. A hierarchical account of referential accessibility. In Proceedings of the 38th AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 416-424.
56. Ryu Iida, Kentaro Inui, Hiroya Takamura, and Yuji Matsumoto. 2003. Incorporating contextual cues in trainable models for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the EACL Workshop on The Computational Treatment of Anaphora.
57. Ryu Iida, Kentaro Inui, and Yuji Matsumoto. 2006. Exploting syntactic patterns as clues in zeroanaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 625-632.
58. Ryu Iida, Kentaro Inui, and Yuji Matsumoto. 2007a. Zero-anaphora resolution by learning rich syntactic pattern features. ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing, 6(4).
59. Ryu Iida, Mamoru Komachi, Kentaro Inui, and Yuji Matsumoto. 2007b. Annotating a Japanese text corpus with predicate-argument and coreference relations. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop 'Linguistic Annotation Workshop', pages 132-139.
60. Ryu Iida, Kentaro Inui, and Yuji Matsumoto. 2009. Capturing salience with a trainable cache model for zero-anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, pages 647-655.
61. Ryu Iida. 2007. Combining Linguistic Knowledge and Machine Learning for Anaphora Resolution. Ph.D. thesis, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Japan.
62. Heng Ji, DavidWestbrook, and Ralph Grishman. 2005. Using semantic relations to refine coreference decisions. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 17-24.
63. Thorsten Joachims. 1999. Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In Bernhard Scholkopf and Alexander Smola, editors, Advances in KernelMethods - Support Vector Learning, pages 44-56. MIT Press.
64. Andrew Kehler, Douglas Appelt, Lara Taylor, and Aleksandr Simma. 2004a. Competitive self-trained pronoun interpretation. In Proceedings of HLTNAACL 2004: Short Papers, pages 33-36.
65. Andrew Kehler, Douglas Appelt, Lara Taylor, and Aleksandr Simma. 2004b. The (non)utility of predicate-argument frequencies for pronoun interpretation. In Human Language Technologies 2004: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics; Proceedings of the Main Conference, pages 289-296.
66. Andrew Kehler. 1997. Probabilistic coreference in information extraction. In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 163-173.
67. Christopher Kennedy and Branimir Boguraev. 1996. Anaphor for everyone: Pronominal anaphora resolution without a parser. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 113-118.
68. Manfred Klenner and Étienne Ailloud. 2008. Enhancing coreference clustering. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Anaphora Resolution, pages 31-40.
69. Manfred Klenner and Étienne Ailloud. 2009. Optimization in coreference resolution is not needed: A nearly-optimal algorithm with intensional constraints. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 442-450.
70. Manfred Klenner. 2007. Enforcing consistency on coreference sets. In Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing.
71. Fang Kong, GuoDong Zhou, and Qiaoming Zhu. 2009. Employing the centering theory in pronoun resolution from the semantic perspective. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 987-996.
72. Shalom Lappin and Herbert Leass. 1994. An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution. Computational Linguistics, 20(4):535-562.
73. Xiaoqiang Luo and Imed Zitouni. 2005. Multi-lingual coreference resolution with syntactic features. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 660-667.
74. Xiaoqiang Luo, Abe Ittycheriah, Hongyan Jing, Nanda Kambhatla, and Salim Roukos. 2004. A mentionsynchronous coreference resolution algorithm based on the Bell tree. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 135-142.
75. Xiaoqiang Luo. 2005. On coreference resolution performance metrics. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 25-32.
76. Xiaoqiang Luo. 2007. Coreference or not: A twin model for coreference resolution. In Human Language Technologies 2007: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics; Proceedings of theMain Conference, pages 73-80.
77. Mitchell P. Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313-330.
78. Katja Markert and Malvina Nissim. 2005. Comparing knowledge sources for nominal anaphora resolution. Computational Linguistics, 31(3):367-402.
79. Andrew McCallum and Ben Wellner. 2003. Toward conditional models of identity uncertainty with application to proper noun coreference. In Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Information Integration on the Web.
80. Andrew McCallum and Ben Wellner. 2004. Conditional models of identity uncertainty with application to noun coreference. In Advances in Neural Information Proceesing Systems.
81. Joseph McCarthy and Wendy Lehnert. 1995. Using decision trees for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1050-1055.
82. Ruslan Mitkov. 1999. Anaphora resolution: The state of the art. Technical Report (Based on the COLING/ACL-98 tutorial on anaphora resolution), University of Wolverhampton,Wolverhampton.
83. Ruslan Mitkov. 2001. Outstanding issues in anaphora resolution. In Al. Gelbukh, editor, Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, pages 110-125. Springer.
84. Ruslan Mitkov. 2002. Anaphora Resolution. Longman.
85. Natalia N. Modjeska, Katja Markert, and Malvina Nissim. 2003. Using the web in machine learning for other-anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 176-183.
86. MUC-6. 1995. Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference.
87. MUC-7. 1998. Proceedings of the Seventh Message Understanding Conference.
88. Christoph Müller, Stefan Rapp, and Michael Strube. 2002. Applying co-training to reference resolution. In Proceedings of the 40th AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 352-359.
89. Christoph Müller. 2006. Automatic detection of nonreferential it in spoken multi-party dialog. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 49-56.
90. Vincent Ng and Claire Cardie. 2002a. Combining sample selection and error-driven pruning for machine learning of coreference rules. In Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 55-62.
91. Vincent Ng and Claire Cardie. 2002b. Identifying anaphoric and non-anaphoric noun phrases to improve coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 19th InternationalConference on Computational Linguistics, pages 730-736.
92. Vincent Ng and Claire Cardie. 2002c. Improving machine learning approaches to coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 40th AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 104-111.
93. Vincent Ng. 2004. Learning noun phrase anaphoricity to improve conference resolution: Issues in representation and optimization. In Proceedings of the 42nd AnnualMeeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 151-158.
94. Vincent Ng. 2007a. Semantic class induction and coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 45th AnnualMeeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 536-543.
95. Vincent Ng. 2007b. Shallow semantics for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the Twentieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1689-1694.
96. Vincent Ng. 2008. Unsupervised models for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 640-649.
97. Vincent Ng. 2009. Graph-cut-based anaphoricity determination for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 575-583.
98. Giang Linh Ng{ucombining dot below}y, Václav Novák, and Zdeněk Žabokrtský. 2009. Comparison of classification and ranking approaches to pronominal anaphora resolution in Czech. In Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2009 Conference, pages 276-285.
99. Cristina Nicolae and Gabriel Nicolae. 2006. Best-Cut: A graph algorithm for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 275-283.
100. Kristina Nilsson. 2010. Hybrid Methods for Coreference Resolution in Swedish. Ph.D. thesis, Stockholm University, Sweden.
101. Tomoko Ohta, Yuka Tateisi, and Jin-Dong Kim. 2002. The GENIA corpus: An annotated research abstract corpus in molecular biology domain. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Human Language Technology Research, pages 82-86.
102. Constantin Orǎsan and Richard Evans. 2007. NP animacy identification for anaphora resolution. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 29:79-103.
103. Constantin Orǎsan, Dan Cristea, Ruslan Mitkov, and António H. Branco. 2008. Anaphora Resolution Exercise: An overview. In Proceedings of the 6th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages 2801-2805.
104. Chris Paice and Gareth Husk. 1987. Towards the automatic recognition of anaphoric features in English text: the impersonal pronoun 'it'. Computer Speech and Language, 2:109-132.
105. Massimo Poesio and Mijail A. Kabadjov. 2004. A general-purpose, off-the-shelf anaphora resolution module: Implementation and preliminary evaluation. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 663-668.
106. Massimo Poesio, Rahul Mehta, Axel Maroudas, and Janet Hitzeman. 2004a. Learning to resolve bridging references. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 143-150.
107. Massimo Poesio, Olga Uryupina, Renata Vieira, Mijail Alexandrov-Kabadjov, and Rodrigo Goulart. 2004b. Discourse-new detectors for definite description resolution: A survey and a preliminary proposal. In Proeedings of the ACL Workshop on Reference Resolution.
108. Massimo Poesio, David Day, Ron Artstein, Jason Duncan, Vladimir Eidelman, Claudio Giuliano, Rob Hall, Janet Hitzeman, Alan Jern, Mijail Kabadjov, Stanley Yong Wai Keong, Gideon Mann, Alessandro Moschitti, Simone Ponzetto, Jason Smith, Josef Steinberger,Michael Strube, Jian Su, Yannick Versley, Xiaofeng Yang, and Michael Wick. 2007. ELERFED: Final report of the research group on Exploiting Lexical and Encyclopedic Resources For Entity Disambiguation. Technical report, Summer Workshop on Language Engineering, Center for Language and Speech Processing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
109. Simone Paolo Ponzetto and Massimo Poesio. 2009. State-of-the-art NLP approaches to coreference resolution: Theory and practical recipes. In Tutorial Abstracts of ACL-IJCNLP 2009, page 6.
110. Simone Paolo Ponzetto and Michael Strube. 2006a. Exploiting semantic role labeling, WordNet and Wikipedia for coreference resolution. In Human Language Technologies 2006: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics; Proceedings of theMain Conference, pages 192-199.
111. Simone Paolo Ponzetto and Michael Strube. 2006b. Semantic role labeling for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 143-146.
112. Simone Paolo Ponzetto and Michael Strube. 2007. Knowledge derived from Wikipedia for computing semantic relatedness. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 30:181-212.
113. Hoifung Poon and Pedro Domingos. 2008. Joint unsupervised coreference resolution with Markov Logic. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 650-659.
114. Andrei Popescu-Belis, Loïs Rigouste, Susanne Salmon-Alt, and Laurent Romary. 2004. Online evaluation of coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 1507-1510.
115. Long Qiu, Min-Yen Kan, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2004. A public reference implementation of the RAP anaphora resolution algorithm. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 291-294.
116. John Ross Quinlan. 1993. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.
117. Altaf Rahman andVincentNg. 2009. Supervisedmodels for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 968-977.
118. Marta Recasens andM. AntóniaMartí. 2009. AnCora-CO: Coreferentially annotated corpora for Spanish and Catalan. Language Resources and Evaluation, 43(4).
119. Marta Recasens, Toni Martí, Mariona Taulé, Lluís Màrquez, and Emili Sapena. 2009. SemEval-2010 Task 1: Coreference resolution in multiple languages. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Evaluations: Recent Achievements and Future Directions (SEW-2009), pages 70-75.
120. Candace Sidner. 1979. Towards a Computational Theory of Definite Anaphora Comprehension in English Discourse. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.
121. Wee Meng Soon, Hwee Tou Ng, and Chung Yong Lim. 1999. Corpus-based learning for noun phrase coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 1999 Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora, pages 285-291.
122. Wee Meng Soon, Hwee Tou Ng, and Daniel Chung Yong Lim. 2001. A machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases. Computational Linguistics, 27(4):521-544.
123. Veselin Stoyanov, Nathan Gilbert, Claire Cardie, and Ellen Riloff. 2009. Conundrums in noun phrase coreference resolution: Making sense of the stateof-the-art. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, pages 656-664.
124. Veselin Stoyanov, Claire Cardie, Nathan Gilbert, Ellen Riloff, David Buttler, and David Hysom. 2010. Coreference resolution with Reconcile. In Proceedings of the ACL 2010 Conference Short Papers.
125. Michael Strube, Stefan Rapp, and Christoph Müller. 2002. The influence of minimum edit distance on reference resolution. In Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 312-319.
126. Michael Strube. 2002. NLP approaches to reference resolution. In Tutorial Abstracts of ACL 2002, page 124.
127. Michael Strube. 2009. Anaphernresolution. In Computerlinguistik und Sprachtechnologie. Eine Einfuhrung. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 3rd edition.
128. Heike Telljohann, Erhard Hinrichs, and Sandra Kübler. 2004. The tüba-d/z treebank: Annotating German with a context-free backbone. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 2229-2235.
129. Joel Tetreault. 2005. Empirical Evaluations of Pronoun Resolution. Ph.D. thesis, University of Rochester, USA.
130. Olga Uryupina. 2003. High-precision identification of discourse new and unique noun phrases. In Proceedings of the ACL Student Research Workshop, pages 80-86.
131. Olga Uryupina. 2004. Linguisticallymotivated sample selection for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 5th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphor Resolution Colloquium.
132. Kees van Deemter and Rodger Kibble. 2000. On coreferring: Coreference in MUC and related annotation schemes. Computational Linguistics, 26(4):629-637.
133. Yannick Versley, Alessandro Moschitti, Massimo Poesio, and Xiaofeng Yang. 2008a. Coreference systems based on kernels methods. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 961-968.
134. Yannick Versley, Simone Paolo Ponzetto, Massimo Poesio, Vladimir Eidelman, Alan Jern, Jason Smith, Xiaofeng Yang, and Alessandro Moschitti. 2008b. BART: A modular toolkit for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the ACL-08: HLT Demo Session, pages 9-12.
135. Yannick Versley. 2006. A constraint-based approach to noun phrase coreference resolution in German newspaper text. In Konferenz zur Verarbeitung Natürlicher Sprache.
136. Yannick Versley. 2007. Antecedent selection techniques for high-recall coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 496-505.
137. Renata Vieira and Massimo Poesio. 2000. Processing definite descriptions in corpora. In S. Botley and A.McEnery, editors, Corpus-based and Computational Approaches to Discourse Anaphora, pages 189-212. UCL Press.
138. Marc Vilain, John Burger, John Aberdeen,Dennis Connolly, and Lynette Hirschman. 1995. A modeltheoretic coreference scoring scheme. In Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference, pages 45-52.
139. Marilyn Walker, Aravind Joshi, and Ellen Prince, editors. 1998. Centering Theory in Discourse. Oxford University Press.
140. HolgerWunsch. 2010. Rule-based and Memory-based Pronoun Resolution for German: A Comparison and Assessment of Data Sources. Ph.D. thesis, University of Tübingen, Germany.
141. Xiaofeng Yang and Jian Su. 2007. Coreference resolution using semantic relatedness information from automatically discovered patterns. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 528-535.
142. Xiaofeng Yang, Guodong Zhou, Jian Su, and Chew Lim Tan. 2003. Coreference resolution using competitive learning approach. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 176-183.
143. Xiaofeng Yang, Jian Su, and Chew Lim Tan. 2004a. Improving noun phrase coreference resolution by matching strings. In Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 22-31.
144. Xiaofeng Yang, Jian Su, GuoDong Zhou, and Chew Lim Tan. 2004b. An NP-cluster based approach to coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 20th InternationalConference on Computational Linguistics, pages 226-232.
145. Xiaofeng Yang, Jian Su, and Chew Lim Tan. 2005. Improving pronoun resolution using statistics-based semantic compatibility information. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 165-172.
146. Xiaofeng Yang, Jian Su, and Chew Lim Tan. 2006. Kernel based pronoun resolution with structured syntactic knowledge. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 41-48.
147. Xiaofeng Yang, Jian Su, Jun Lang, Chew Lim Tan, and Sheng Li. 2008a. An entity-mention model for coreference resolution with inductive logic programming. In Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, pages 843-851.
148. Xiaofeng Yang, Jian Su, and Chew Lim Tan. 2008b. A twin-candidate model for learning-based anaphora resolution. Computational Linguistics, 34(3):327-356.
149. Dmitry Zelenko, Chinatsu Aone, and Jason Tibbetts. 2004. Coreference resolution for information extraction. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Reference Resolution and its Applications, pages 9-16.
150. Shanheng Zhao and Hwee Tou Ng. 2007. Identification and resolution of Chinese zero pronouns: A machine learning approach. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods on Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 541-550.
151. GuoDong Zhou and Fang Kong. 2009. Global learning of noun phrase anaphoricity in coreference resolution via label propagation. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 978-986.