Coreference systems based on kernels methods

Coling 2008 - 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2008, Pages 961-968

  Versley, Yannick ^a   Moschitti, Alessandro ^b   Poesio, Massimo ^b   Yang, Xiaofeng ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^c INSTITUTE FOR INFOCOMM RESEARCH   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CO-REFERENCE RESOLUTIONS; COREFERENCE; FEATURE COMBINATION; KERNEL FUNCTION; LEXICAL INFORMATION; STANDARD FRAMEWORKS; STRUCTURAL INFORMATION; STRUCTURE-SENSITIVE;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 80053421041     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1599081.1599202     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Aone, C. and Bennett, S. W. (1995). Evaluating automated and manual acquisition of anaphora resolution strategies. In Proc. ACL 1995, pages 122-129.
2. Barzilay, R. and Lapata, M. (2005). Modelling local coherence: An entity-based approach. In Proc. of ACL, Ann Arbor, MI.
3. Boyd, A., Gegg-Harrison, W., and Byron, D. (2005). Identifying non-referential it: a machine learning approach incorporating linguistically motivated features. In Proc. ACL WS on Feature Engineering for Machine Learning in Natural Language Processing.
4. Cancedda, N., Gaussier, E., Goutte, C., and Renders, J. M. (2003). Word sequence kernels. JMLR, 3:1059-1082.
5. Chinchor, N. and Sundheim, B. (2003). Muc 6 corpus. Message Understanding Conference (MUC) 6.
6. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Foris, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
7. Collins, M. and Duffy, N. (2002). New ranking algorithms for parsing and tagging: kernels over discrete structures and the voted perceptron. In Proc. ACL 2002, pages 263-270.
8. Evans, R. (2001). Applying machine learning toward an automatic classification of it. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 16(1):45-57.
9. Giuglea, A.-M. and Moschitti, A. (2006). Semantic role labeling via framenet, verbnet and propbank. In Proceedings of Coling-ACL, Sydney, Australia.
10. Grosz, B., Joshi, A., and Weinstein, S. (1995). Centering: a framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. CL, 21(2):203-225.
11. Hobbs, J. (1978). Resolving pronoun references. Lingua, 44:339-352.
12. Hobbs, J. (1979). Resolving pronoun references. Coherence and Coreference, 3(1):67-90.
13. Iida, R., Inui, K., and Matsumoto, Y. (2006). Exploiting syntactic patterns as clues in zero-anaphora resolution. In Proc. Coling/ACL 2006, pages 625-632.
14. Kennedy, C. and Boguraev, B. (1996). Anaphora for everyone: pronominal anaphora resolution without a parser. In Proc. Coling 1996.
15. Lappin, S. and Leass, H. (1994). An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution. CL, 20(4):525-561.
16. Luo, X. and Zitouni, I. (2005). Multi-lingual coreference resolution with syntactic features. In Proc. HLT/EMNLP 05.
17. McCarthy, J. and Lehnert, W. (1995). Using decision trees for coreference resolution. In Proc. IJCAI 1995.
18. Mitkov, R. (2002). Anaphora resolution. Longman.
19. Moschitti, A. (2006). Efficient convolution kernels for dependency and constituent syntactic trees. Proc. ECML 2006.
20. Moschitti, A. and Bejan, C. A. (2004). A semantic kernel for predicate argument classification. In CoNLL-2004, USA.
21. Moschitti, A., Pighin, D., and Basili, R. (2006). Semantic Role Labeling via Tree Kernel Joint Inference. In Proceedings of CoNLL-X.
22. Moschitti, A., Quarteroni, S., Basili, R., and Manandhar, S. (2007). Exploiting syntactic and shallow semantic kernels for question answer classification. In Proceedings ACL, Prague, Czech Republic.
23. Ng, V. and Cardie, C. (2002). Improving machine learning approaches to coreference resolution. In Proc. ACL 2002.
24. Paice, C. D. and Husk, G. D. (1987). Towards an automatic recognition of anaphoric features in english text: The impersonal pronoun 'it'. Computer Speech and Language, 2:109-132.
25. Shawe-Taylor, J. and Cristianini, N. (2004). Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
26. Sidner, C. (1979). Toward a computational theory of definite anaphora comprehension in english. Technical report AI-TR-537, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
27. Soon, W., Ng, H., and Lim, D. (2001). A machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases. CL, 27(4):521-544.
28. Steinberger, J., Poesio, M., Kabadjov, M., and Jezek, K. (2007). Two uses of anaphora resolution in summarization. Information Processing and Management, 43:1663-1680. Special issue on Summarization.
29. Sturt, P. (2003). The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. Journal of Memory and Language.
30. Vapnik, V. (1995). The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer.
31. Vieira, R. and Poesio, M. (2000). An empirically based system for processing definite descriptions. CL, 27(4):539-592.
32. Yang, X., Su, J., and Tan, C. (2006). Kernel-based pronoun resolution with structured syntactic knowledge. In Proc. COLING-ACL 06.
33. Yang, X., Su, J., Zhou, G., and Tan, C. (2004). Improving pronoun resolution by incorporating coreferential information of candidates. In Proc. ACL 2004.
34. Zanzotto, F. M. and Moschitti, A. (2006). Automatic learning of textual entailments with cross-pair similarities. In Proceedings of Coling-ACL, Sydney, Australia.
35. Zelenko, D., Aone, C., and Richardella, A. (2003). Kernel methods for relation extraction. JMLR, 3(6):1083 - 1106.