A general-purpose, off-the-shelf anaphora resolution module: Implementation and preliminary evaluation

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 663-666

  Poesio, Massimo ^a   Kabadjov, Mijail A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAPHORA RESOLUTION; DEFINITE DESCRIPTIONS; NL PROCESSING; OFF-THE-SHELF COMPONENTS; PRONOUN RESOLUTION;

COMPUTATIONAL GRAMMARS;

EID: 85029437076     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Alonso, L. and M. Fuentes, 2003. Integrating Cohesion and Coherence for Text Summarization. In Proc. of the EACL Student Session, pages 1-8, Budapest.
2. Boguraev, B. and C. Kennedy, 1997. Salience-based content characterisation of text documents. In Proc. of ACL/EACL Workshop on Summarization, pages 2-9.
3. Brew, C. and D. McKelvie and R. Tobin and H. Thompson and A. Mikheev, The XML Library LT XML Version 1.2, LT-XML
4. Byron, D., 2002. Resolving Pronominal Reference to Abstract Entities. In Proc. of the 40th ACL.
5. Byron, D. and J. Tetreault, 1999. A Flexible Architecture for Reference Resolution. In Proc. of the 9th EACL.
6. Gaizauskas, R. and K. Humphreys, 2000. Quantitative Evaluation of Coreference Algorithms in an Information Extraction System. In S. Botley and T. McEnery (eds.), Corpus-based and Computational Approaches to Discourse Anaphora. Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins, pages 145-169.
7. Grosz, B., J. Aravind, and W. Scott, 1995. Centering: A Framework for Modelling the Local Coherence of Discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2).
8. Hobbs, J.R., 1978. Resolving pronoun references. Lingua, 44, pages 311-338.
9. Kennedy, C. and B. Boguraev, 1996. Anaphora for everyone: Pronominal anaphora resolution without a parser. In Proc. of the 16th COLING, Budapest.
10. Morton, T. Coreference for NLP Applications. Proc. 38th ACL
11. Ng, V. and C. Cardie, 2002. Improving Machine Learning Approaches to Coreference Resolution. In Proc of ACL
12. McKelvie, D., C. Brew, and H. Thompson, 1997. Using SGML as a Basis for Data-Intensive NLP. In Proc. of ANLP, Washington D.C.
13. Mitkov, R., 2002. Anaphora Resolution. Longman
14. Poesio, M. and R. Vieira, 1998. A corpus-based investigation of definite description use. Computational Linguistics, 24(2):183-216. Also available as Research Paper CCS-RP-71, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh.
15. Poesio, M., F. Bruneseaux and L. Romary, 1999. The MATE meta-scheme for coreference in dialogues in multiple languages. In Proc. of the ACL Workshop on Standards for Discourse Tagging. Maryland.
16. Poesio, M., Ishikawa, T., Sabine Schulte im Walde, and R. Vieira. 2002. Acquiring Lexical Information for Anaphora Resolution. Proc. of LREC
17. Poesio, M., 2004. The MATE/GNOME annotation scheme for anaphora deixis, revisited. Proc. of SIGDIAL.
18. Vieira, R. and M. Poesio, 2000. An empirically-based system for processing definite descriptions. Computational Linguistics, 26(4).
19. Watson, R., J. Preiss, and E.J. Briscoe, 2003. The Contribution of Domain-independent Robust Pronominal Anaphora Resolution to Open-Domain Question-Answering. In Proc of Int. Symposium on Reference Resolution, Venezia