On coreferring: Coreference in MUC and related annotation schemes

Computational Linguistics

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 628-637

  Van Deemter, Kees ^a   Kibble, Rodger ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANNOTATION SCHEME; COREFERENCE; DIVISION OF LABOR; SEMANTIC RELATIONS;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 0039332964     PISSN: 08912017     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ABPI. 1997. 1996-1997 ABPI Compendium of Patient Information Leaflets. Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry.
2. Appelt, Douglas. 1998. An overview of information extraction technology and its application to information retrieval. In Proceedings of TWLT14, Language Technology in Multimedia Information Retrieval, pages 49-58, Twente.
3. Bach, Kent. 1987. Thought and Reference. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
4. Bagga, Amit, Breck Baldwin, and Sara Shelton. 1998. Coreference and its applications. Call for papers for workshop associated with the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, University of Maryland, 1999. See www.cs.duke.edu/∼amit/acc99-wkshp.html.
5. Barwise, Jon and Robin Cooper. 1981. Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4:159-219.
6. Cristea, Dan, Nancy Ide, Daniel Marcu, and Valentin Tablan. 1999. Discourse structure and coreference: An empirical study. In Dan Cristea, Nancy Ide, and Daniel Marcu, editors, Proceedings of ACL'99 Ws: The Relation of Discourse/Dialogue Structure and Reference, pages 46-53.
7. Davies, Sarah, Massimo Poesio, Florence Bruneseaux, and Laurent Romary. 1998. Annotating coreference in dialogues: Proposal for a scheme for MATE. See www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/∼poesio/MATE/anno-manual.html.
8. Donnellan, Keith. 1966. Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review, 75:281-304.
9. Dowty, David, Robert Wall, and Stanley Peters. 1981. Introduction to Montague Semantics. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
10. Gamut, L. T. F. 1991. Logic, Language and Meaning, Volume 2. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
11. Garside, Roger, Geoffrey Leech, and Tony McEnery. 1997. Corpus Annotation. Longman, London.
12. Groenendijk, Jeroen, Martin Stokhof, and Frank Veltman. 1996. Coreference and modality. In Shalom Lappin, editor, The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, pages 179-214.
13. Hirschman, Lynette and Nancy Chinchor. 1997. MUC-7 coreference task definition. In MUC-7 Proceedings. Science Applications International Corporation. See www.muc.saic.com.
14. Hirschman, Lynette, Patricia Robinson, John Burger, and Marc Vilain. 1997. Automating coreference: The role of annotated training data. In Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Applying Machine Learning to Discourse Processing.
15. Kamp, Hans and Uwe Reyle. 1993. From Discourse to Logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
16. Kibble, Rodger and Kees van Deemter. 2000. Coreference annotation: Whither? In Maria Gavrilidou et al., editors, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 1,281-1,286, Athens.
17. Kronfeld, Ami and Lawrence Roberts. 1998. Special Issue on Reference, Pragmatics and Cognition 6. John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia.
18. Partee, Barbara. 1989. Binding implicit variables in quantified contexts. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 25:342-365.
19. Partee, Barbara, Alice ter Meulen, and Robert Wall. 1990. Mathematical Methods in Linguistics. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
20. Passoneau, Rebecca. 1997. Instructions for applying discourse reference annotation for multiple applications (DRAMA). Unpublished manuscript.
21. Poesio, Massimo. 2000. Annotating a corpus to develop and evaluate discourse entity realization algorithms: Issues and preliminary results. In Maria Gavrilidou et al., editors, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluations, pages 211-218, Athens.
22. Popescu-Belis, Andrei. 1998. How corpora with annotated coreference links improve reference resolution. In Antonio Rubio et al., editors, First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 567-572, Granada. European Language Resources Association.
23. Sidner, Candace. 1979. Towards a Computational Theory of Definite Anaphora Comprehension in English Discourse. Ph.D. dissertation, AI Lab, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
24. Sidner, Candace. 1983. Focusing in the comprehension of definite anaphora. In Michael Brady and Robert Berwick, editors, Computational Models of Discourse. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pages 267-330.
25. van Deemter, Kees. 1992. Towards a generalization of anaphora. Journal of Semantics, 9:27-51.
26. van Deemter, Kees and Rodger Kibble. 1999. What is coreference and what should coreference annotation be? In Amit Bagga, Breck Baldwin, and Sara Shelton, editors, Proceedings of ACL workshop on Coreference and Its Applications, pages 90-96, Maryland.
27. van der Sandt, Rob. 1992. Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics, 9:333-37.