Specialized models and ranking for coreference resolution

EMNLP 2008 - 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference: A Meeting of SIGDAT, a Special Interest Group of the ACL

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 660-669

  Denis, Pascal ^a   Baldridge, Jason ^b  

^a INRIA ROCQUENCOURT   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION FUNCTIONS; CO-REFERENCE RESOLUTIONS; COREFERENCE; EVALUATION METRICS; F-SCORE; LOSS FUNCTIONS; PROPER NOUNS; SINGLE MODELS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 77749246823     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1613715.1613797     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. M. Ariel. 1988. Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics, pages 65-87.
2. N. Asher, P. Denis, and B. Reese. 2006. Names and pops and discourse structure. In Workshop on Constraints in Discourse, Maynooth, Ireland.
3. A. Bagga and B. Baldwin. 1998. Algorithms for scoring coreference chains. In Proceedings of LREC 1998, pages 563-566.
4. 12We strongly advocate that coreference results should never be presented in terms of MUC scores alone E. Charniak and M. Johnson. 2005. Coarse-to-fine nbest parsing and maxent discriminative reranking. In Proceedings of ACL 2005, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
5. M. Collins and N. Duffy. 2002. New ranking algorithms for parsing and tagging: Kernels over discrete structures and the voted perceptron. In Proceedings of ACL 2002, pages 263-270, Philadelphia, PA.
6. H. Daumé III and D. Marcu. 2005. A large-scale exploration of effective global features for a joint entity detection and tracking model. In Proceedings of HLTEMNLP 2005, Vancouver, Canada.
7. P. Denis and J. Baldridge. 2007a. Joint determination of anaphoricity and coreference resolution using integer programming. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2007, Rochester, NY.
8. P. Denis and J. Baldridge. 2007b. A ranking approach to pronoun resolution. In Proceedings of IJCAI 2007, Hyderabad, India.
9. Pascal Denis. 2007. New Learning Models for Robust Reference Resolution. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.
10. R. Elwell and J. Baldridge. 2008. Discourse connective argument identification with connective specific rankers. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Semantic Computing, Santa Clara, CA.
11. B. Grosz, A. Joshi, and S. Weinstein. 1995. Centering: A framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 2(21).
12. J. K. Gundel, N. Hedberg, and R. Zacharski. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69:274-307.
13. A. Haghighi and D. Klein. 2007. Unsupervised coreference resolution in a nonparametric Bayesian model. In Proceedings ACL 2007, pages 848-855, Prague, Czech Republic.
14. A. Kehler, D. Appelt, L. Taylor, and A. Simma. 2004. The (non)utility of predicate-argument frequencies for pronoun interpretation. In Proceedings of HLTNAACL 2004.
15. X. Luo. 2005. On coreference resolution performance metrics. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2005, pages 25-32.
16. R. Malouf. 2002. A comparison of algorithms for maximum entropy parameter estimation. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Natural Language Learning, pages 49-55, Taipei, Taiwan.
17. A. McCallum and B. Wellner. 2004. Conditional models of identity uncertainty with application to noun coreference. In Proceedings of NIPS 2004.
18. J. F. McCarthy and W. G. Lehnert. 1995. Using decision trees for coreference resolution. In IJCAI, pages 1050-1055.
19. T. Morton. 2000. Coreference for NLP applications. In Proceedings of ACL 2000, Hong Kong.
20. V. Ng and C. Cardie. 2002a. Identifying anaphoric and non-anaphoric noun phrases to improve coreference resolution. In Proceedings of COLING 2002.
21. V. Ng and C. Cardie. 2002b. Improving machine learning approaches to coreference resolution. In Proceedings of ACL 2002, pages 104-111.
22. V. Ng. 2004. Learning noun phrase anaphoricity to improve coreference resolution: Issues in representation and optimization. In Proceedings of ACL 2004.
23. V. Ng. 2005a. Machine learning for coreference resolution: From local classification to global ranking. In Proceedings of ACL 2005, pages 157-164, Ann Arbor, MI.
24. V. Ng. 2005b. Supervised ranking for pronoun resolution: Some recent improvements. In Proceedings of AAAI 2005.
25. V. Ng. 2007. Semantic class induction and coreference resolution. In Proceedings of ACL 2007.
26. M. Osborne and J. Baldridge. 2004. Ensemble-based active learning for parse selection. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2004, pages 89-96, Boston, MA.
27. E. F. Prince. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole, editor, Radical Pragmatics, pages 223-255. Academic Press, New York.
28. D. Ravichandran, E. Hovy, and F. J. Och. 2003. Statistical QA-classifier vs re-ranker: What's the difference? In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Multilingual Summarization and Question Answering-Machine Learning and Beyond.
29. W. M. Soon, H. T. Ng, and D. Lim. 2001. A machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases. Computational Linguistics, 27(4):521-544.
30. K. Toutanova, P. Markova, and C. Manning. 2004. The leaf projection path view of parse trees: Exploring string kernels for HPSG parse selection. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2004, pages 166-173, Barcelona.
31. O. Uryupina. 2004. Linguistically motivated sample selection for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of DAARC 2004, Furnas.
32. R. van der Sandt. 1992. Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics, 9:333-377.
33. M. Vilain, J. Burger, J. Aberdeen, D. Connolly, and L. Hirschman. 1995. A model-theoretic coreference scoring scheme. In Proceedings fo the 6th Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6), pages 45-52, San Mateo, CA. Morgan Kaufmann.
34. X. Yang, G. Zhou, J. Su, and C.L. Tan. 2003. Coreference resolution using competitive learning approach. In Proceedings of ACL 2003, pages 176-183.