Online evaluation of coreference resolution

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1507-1510

  Popescu Belis, Andrei ^a   Rigouste, Loïs ^b   Salmon Alt, Susanne ^c   Romary, Laurent ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b TELECOM PARISTECH   (France)

^c ATILF CNRS   (France)

^d LORIA   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CO-REFERENCE RESOLUTIONS; COREFERENCE; EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS; INPUT FILES; MUTUAL INFORMATIONS; ON-LINE EVALUATION; REFERRING EXPRESSIONS;

EQUIVALENCE CLASSES;

EID: 84880265295     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Bagga, A. and Baldwin, B. (1998). Algorithms for scoring coreference chains. Proceedings LREC'98 Workshop on Linguistic Coreference. Granada, Spain.
2. Carletta, J. (1996). Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics 22(2), p. 249-254.
3. Davies S., Poesio M. (2000). MATE Deliverable 1.1, Chapter 3: Coreference. Available at: http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/~poesio/MATE/coreference.html.
4. Hirschman, L. (1997). MUC-7 Coreference Task Definition. The MITRE Corporation.
5. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage Publications.
6. Mitkov, R. (2001). Towards a more consistent evaluation and comprehensive evaluation of anaphora resolution algorithms and systems. Applied Artificial Intelligence 15(3), p. 253-276.
7. Mitkov, R. (2002) Anaphora Resolution. Studies in Language and Linguistics. Longman.
8. MUC-6 (1995) Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference. Morgan Kaufmann.
9. MUC-7 (1998) Proceedings of the Seventh Message Understanding Conference. Available at http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/894.02/related-projects/muc/.
10. Müller Ch., Strube M. (2001). Annotating Anaphoric and Bridging Relations with MMAX. Proceedings of the 2nd SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Aalborg, Denmark.
11. Passonneau, R. J. (1997). Applying reliability metrics to co-reference annotation. Technical Report CUCS-017-97, Dept. of Computer Science, Columbia University.
12. Poesio, M., Bruneseaux, F., and Romary, L. (1999). The MATE meta-scheme for coreference in dialogues in multiple language. Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Standards for Discourse Tagging, Maryland.
13. Popescu-Belis, A. (1998). How corpora with annotated coreference links improve anaphora and reference resolution. Proceedings LREC'98, vol. 1, pp. 567-572. Granada, Spain.
14. Popescu-Belis, A. (2000). Évaluation numérique de la résolution de la référence : critiques et propositions. T.A.L. : Traitement automatique des langues, 40(2), p. 117-146.
15. Popescu-Belis, A. (2003). "Evaluation-Driven Design of a Robust Reference Resolution System". Natural Language Engineering, 9(2), p. 1-26.
16. Salmon-Alt, S. (2001). Entre corpus et théorie: l'annotation (co-)référentielle. T.A.L. : Traitement automatique des langues, 42(2), p. 459-486.
17. Salmon-Alt, S., and Romary, L. (2004). RAF: Towards a Reference Annotation Framework. Proceedings of LREC 2004, Lisbon.
18. Salton, G. and McGill, M. J. (1983). Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill.
19. Van Deemter, K., and Kibble, R. (2000). On Coreferring: Coreference in MUC and Related Annotation Schemes. Computational Linguistics, 26(4), p. 629-637.
20. Vilain, M., Burger, J., Aberdeen, J., Connolly, D. and Hirschman, L. (1995). A Model-Theoretic coreference scoring scheme Proceedings of MUC-6, pp. 45-52. Morgan Kaufmann.