Improving machine learning approaches to coreference resolution

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 2002-July, Issue , 2002, Pages 104-111

  Ng, Vincent ^a   Cardie, Claire ^a  

^a Department of Computer Science and School of Operations Research and Information Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

COREFERENCE; COREFERENCE RESOLUTION; DATA SET; F MEASURE; FEATURES SETS; LARGE-SCALES; LEARNING FRAMEWORKS; MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES; NOUN PHRASE; TWO SOURCES;

MACHINE LEARNING;

EID: 85018107058     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. C. Aone and S. W. Bennett. 1995. Evaluating Automated and Manual Acquisition of Anaphora Resolution Strategies. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 122-129.
2. W. Cohen. 1995. Fast Effective Rule Induction. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Machine Learning.
3. R. Grishman. 1995. The NYU System for MUC-6 or Where's the Syntax? In Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6).
4. S. Harabagiu, R. Bunescu, and S. Maiorano. 2001. Text and Knowledge Mining for Coreference Resolution. In Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the North America Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL-2001), pages 55-62.
5. S. Lappin and H. Leass. 1994. An Algorithm for Pronominal Anaphora Resolution. Computational Linguistics, 20(4):535-562.
6. D. Lin. 1995. University of Manitoba: Description of the PIE System as Used for MUC-6. In Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6).
7. J. McCarthy and W. Lehnert. 1995. Using Decision Trees for Coreference Resolution. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1050-1055.
8. R. Mitkov. 1997. Factors in anaphora resolution: they are not the only things that matter. A case study based on two different approaches. In Proceedings of the ACL'97/EACL'97 Workshop on Operational Factors in Practical, Robust Anaphora Resolution.
9. MUC-6. 1995. Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
10. MUC-7. 1998. Proceedings of the Seventh Message Understanding Conference (MUC-7). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
11. J. R. Quinlan. 1993. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.
12. C. Sidner. 1979. Towards a Computational Theory of Definite Anaphora Comprehension in English Discourse. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
13. W. M. Soon, H. T. Ng, and D. C. Y. Lim. 2001. A Machine Learning Approach to Coreference Resolution of Noun Phrases. Computational Linguistics, 27(4):521-544.
14. M. Vilain, J. Burger, J. Aberdeen, D. Connolly, and L. Hirschman. 1995. A model-theoretic coreference scoring scheme. In Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference (MUC-6), pages 45-52, San Francisco, CA. Morgan Kaufmann.