Learning study: Helping teachers to use theory, develop professionally, and produce new knowledge to be shared

Instructional Science

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 589-606

  Pang, Ming Fai ^a   Ling, Lo Mun ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b THE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Learning study; Lesson study; Phenomenography; Teacher professional learning; Variation theory of learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859953738     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-011-9191-4     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (1998). The university of learning-beyond quality and competence in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
2. Chokshi, S., & Fernandez, C. (2004). Challenges to importing Japanese lesson study: Concerns, misconceptions, and nuances. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(7), 520-525.
3. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2001). Beyond certainty: Taking an inquiry stance on practice. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 45-60). New York: Teachers College Press.
4. Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement. CPRE Research Report Series RR-43. Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania, Graduate School of Education.
5. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). http://epaa. asu. edu/epaa/v8n1.
6. Davies, P., & Dunnill, R. (2008). 'Learning study' as a model of collaborative practice in initial teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34(1), 3-16.
7. Fishman, B. J., & Davis, E. A. (2006). Teacher learning research and the learning sciences. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 535-550). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
10. Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., Moore, S., & Manning, S. (2001). Learning to change: Teaching beyond subjects and standards. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
11. Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession: What would it look like and how can we get one? Educational Researcher, 31(5), 3-15.
12. Holmqvist, M. (Ed.). (2006). Lärande i skolan. Learning study som skolutvecklingsmodell. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
13. Holmqvist, M. (2011). Teachers' learning in a learning study. Instructional Science, 39(4), 497-511.
14. Jenlink, P., & Kinnucan-Welsch, K. (2001). Case stories of facilitating professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 705-724.
15. Lewis, C. (2002). Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better School Inc.
16. Lewis, C. (2005). How do teachers learn during lesson study? In P. Wang-Iverson & M. Yoshida (Eds.), Building our understanding of lesson study. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better School Inc.
17. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? A case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3-14.
18. Lo, M. L., Chik, P. M. P., & Pang, M. F. (2006). Patterns of variation in teaching the colour of light to Primary 3 students. Instructional Science, 34, 1-19.
19. Lo, M. L., Pong, W. Y., & Chik, P. M. (Eds.). (2005). For each and everyone-catering for individual differences through learning studies. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
20. Lo, M. L., Pong, W. Y., Marton, F., Leung, A., Ko, P. Y., Ng, F. P., et al. (2002). Catering for individual differences building on variation: The first findings. Hong Kong: INSTEP, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong.
21. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Marton, F. (2001). Learning study. Unpublished manuscript.
24. Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Marton, F., & Morris, P. (Eds.). (2002). What matters? Discovering critical conditions of classroom learning (pp. 9-18). Goteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
26. Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 193-220.
27. Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. M., with Chik, P. M., Ko, P. Y., Lo, M. L., Mok, I. A. C., Ng, F. P., Pang, M. F., Pong, W. Y., & Runesson, U. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Nuthall, G. (2004). Relating classroom teaching to student learning: A critical analysis of why research has failed to bridge the theory-practice gap. Harvard Educational Review, 74(3), 273-306.
29. Pang, M. F. (2006). The use of learning study to enhance teacher professional learning in Hong Kong. Teaching Education, 17, 27-42.
30. Pang, M. F. (2010). Boosting student financial literacy: Benefits of learning study. Instructional Science, 38(6), 659-677.
31. Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2003). Beyond "lesson study"-comparing two ways of facilitating the grasp of economic concepts. Instructional Science, 31(3), 175-194.
32. Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2005). Learning theory as teaching resource: Another example of radical enhancement of students' understanding of economic aspects of the world around them. Instructional Science, 33(2), 159-191.
33. Pang, M. F., & Marton, F. (2007). The paradox of pedagogy: The relative contribution of teachers and learners to learning. Iskolakultura, 1(1), 1-29.
34. Pong, W. Y., & Morris, P. (2002). Accounting for differences in achievement. In F. Marton & P. Morris (Eds.), What matters? Discovering critical conditions of classroom learning (pp. 9-18). Goteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
35. Puchner, L. D., & Taylor, A. R. (2006). Lesson study, collaboration and teacher efficacy: Stories from two school-based math lesson study groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 922-934.
36. Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
37. Richardson, V., & Anders, P. L. (1994). The study of teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Teacher change and the staff development process: A case in reading instruction (pp. 159-180). New York: Teachers College Press.
38. Rohlen, T. P., & LeTendre, G. K. (Eds.). (1995). Teaching and learning in Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39. Runesson, U. (2005). Beyond discourse and interaction. Variation: A critical aspect for teaching and learning mathematics. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(1), 69-87.
40. Sarason, S. B. (1999). Teaching as a performing art. New York: Teachers College Press.
41. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.
42. Watkins, D. A., & Biggs, J. B. (Eds.). (1996). The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong.
43. Yoshida, M. (1999). Lesson study [Jugyokenjyu] in elementary school mathematics in Japan-a case study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.