Hybrid teacher leaders and the new professional development ecology

Professional Development in Education

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 291-315

  Margolis, Jason ^a  

^a DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

professional development; school change; school ecology; teacher change; teacher leadership; teacher relationships

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859761791     PISSN: 19415257     EISSN: 19415265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19415257.2012.657874     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Boatright, B. and Gallucci, C. 2009. The medical residency model goes to school. Journal of staff development, 30(3): 18-22.
2. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy. 2009. Leadership for learning improvements in urban schools, Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
3. City, E. 2009. Instructional rounds in education: a network approach to improving teaching and learning, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
4. Coburn, C. and Russell, J. 2008. District policy and teachers' social networks. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 30(3): 203-235.
5. Cuban, L. 1993. How teachers taught: constancy and change in American classrooms 1890-1990, 2nd ed., New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Domitrovich, C. 2009. Fostering high-quality teaching with an enriched curriculum and professional development support: the Head Start REDI Program. American educational research journal, 46(2): 567-597.
7. Draggo-Severson, E. 2007. Helping teachers learn: principals as professional development leaders. Teachers college record, 109(1): 70-125.
8. Gallucci, C. 2008. Using sociocultural theory to link professional learning to organizational support in the context of school district instructional reform. American journal of education, 114(4): 541-581.
9. Gallucci, C. 2010. Instructional coaching: building theory about the role and organizational support for professional learning. American educational research journal, 47(4): 919-963.
10. Hatch, T. 2000. What does it really take to break the mold? Rhetoric and reality in new American schools. Teachers college record, 102(3): 561-589.
11. Heck, R. and Hallinger, P. 2009. Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American educational research journal, 46(3): 659-689.
12. Intrator, S. and Kunzman, R. 2009. Grounded: practicing what we preach. Journal of teacher education, 60(5): 512-519.
13. Killion, J. and Harrison, C., 2007. Web of support strengthens the effectiveness of school-based coaches. Journal of staff development, 28 (1), 10-12, 14-16, 18.
14. Lieberman, A. and Friedrich, L. 2007. Teachers, writers, leaders. Educational leadership, 65(1): 42-47.
15. Lieberman, A. and Miller, L. 2004. Teacher leadership, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16. Margolis, J. 2008. When teachers face teachers: listening to the resource 'right down the hall'. Teaching education, 19(4): 293-310.
17. Margolis, J. and Huggins, K., in press. Distributed, but undefined: new teacher leader roles to change schools. Journal of school leadership, 22 (5).
18. Marsh, J. 2008. Supporting literacy across the sunshine state: a study of Florida middle school reading coaches, Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
19. Merriam, S. 1998. Qualitative research and case study applications in education, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20. Moss, P. 2009. Learning from our differences: a dialogue across quality in education research. Educational researcher, 38(7): 501-517.
21. Muijs, D. and Harris, A. 2006. Teacher led school improvement: teacher leadership in the UK. Teaching and teacher education, 22(8): 961-972.
22. National Staff Development Council, 2009. Professional learning in the learning profession: a status report on teacher development in the U.S. and abroad [online]. Technical report. Available from: http://www.nsdc.org/news/NSDCstudytechnicalreport2009.pdf [Accessed 13 March 2010].
23. Neuman, S. and Cunningham, L. 2009. The impact of professional development and coaching on early language and literacy instructional practices. American educational research journal, 46(2): 532-566.
24. Peneul, W. 2009. Analyzing teachers' professional interactions in a school as social capital: a social network approach. Teachers college record, 111(1): 124-163.
25. Post, L. 2006. "The teachers-in-residence program: veteran urban teacher leaders in boundary-spanner roles". In Boundary spanners: a key to success in urban P-16 partnerships, Edited by: Howey, K.R. and Zimpher, N.L. 211-236. Washington, DC: American Association of State Colleges and Universities.
26. Reeves, D. 2009. Model teachers. Educational leadership, 66(5): 85-86.
27. Shulman, L. 2004. The wisdom of practice: essays on teaching, learning, and learning to teach, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28. Stake, R. 1995. The art of case study research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Valli, L. 2006. Initiating and sustaining a culture of inquiry in a teacher leadership program. Teacher education quarterly, 33(3): 97-114.
30. Weaver-Hightower, M. 2008. An ecology metaphor for educational policy analysis: a call to complexity. Educational researcher, 37(3): 153-167.
31. York-Barr, J. and Duke, K. 2004. What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of educational research, 74(3): 255-316.
32. Zeichner, K. 2010. Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of teacher education, 61(1-2): 89-99.
33. Zwart, R. 2009. What characteristics of a reciprocal peer coaching context affect teacher learning as perceived by teachers and their students?. Journal of teacher education, 60(3): 243-257.