Instructional coaching: Building theory about the role and organizational support for professional learning

American Educational Research Journal

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 919-963

  Gallucci, Chrysan ^a   DeVoogt van Lare, Michelle ^a   Yoon, Irene H ^a   Boatright, Beth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

case studies; educational reform; learning processes strategies; professional development; teacher education development

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649963650     PISSN: 00028312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0002831210371497     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Angelillo, J. (2003). Writing about reading: From book talk to literary essays, Grades 3-8. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
2. Billett, S. (2002). Toward a workplace pedagogy: Guidance, participation, and engagement. Adult Education Quarterly, 53, 27-43.
3. Blachowicz, C.L.Z., Fogelberg, E., & Obrochta, C. (2005). Literacy coaching for change. Educational Leadership, 62(6), 55-58.
4. Boreham, N., & Morgan, C. (2004). A sociocultural analysis of organizational learning. Oxford Review of Education, 30, 307-325.
5. Brandt, R. (1998). Powerful learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
6. Brown, C.J., Stroh, H.R., Fouts, J.T., & Baker, D.B. (2005). Learning to change: School coaching for systemic reform. Seattle, WA: Fouts & Associates.
7. Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organizational Science, 2, 40-57.
8. Calkins, L. (2001). The art of teaching reading. New York: Longman.
9. Casey, K. (2006). Literacy coaching: The essentials. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
10. City, E.A., Elmore, R.F., Fiarman, S.E., & Teitel, L. (2009). Instructional rounds in education: A network approach to improving teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
11. Coburn, C.E., & Russell, J.L. (2008). District policy and teachers' social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203-235.
12. Coggins, C.T. (2005). Coaching as a districtwide reform strategy. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
13. Coggins, C.T., Stoddard, P., & Cutler, E. (2003). Improving instructional capacity through school-based reform coaches. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
14. Cohen, D.K., & Hill, H.C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102, 294-343.
15. Cohen, D.K., Raudenbush, S.W., & Ball, D.L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 119-142.
16. Costa, A.L., & Garmston, R.J. (1994). Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools. Norwood, MA Christopher- Gordon.
17. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1-44.
18. Desimone, L.M., Porter, A.C., Garet, M.S., Yoon, K.S., & Birman, B.F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers- instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81-112.
19. Donmoyer, R. (1990). Generalizability and the single-case study. In E. W. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 175-200). New York: Teachers College Press.
20. Elmore, R.F. (1995). Structural reform and educational practice. Educational Researcher, 24, 23-26.
21. Elmore, R.F. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
22. Elmore, R.F., & Burney, D. (1997). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement in Community School District #2, New York City. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
23. Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.I., & Shaw, L.L. (1995). Processing fieldnotes: Coding and memoing. In Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (pp. 142-168). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Engestrom, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Finnigan, K.S., & Gross, B. (2007). Do accountability policy sanctions influence teacher motivation? Lessons from Chicago's low-performing schools. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 594-629.
26. Firestone, W.A., & Martinez, C.M. (2007). Districts, teacher leaders, and distributed leadership: Changing instructional practice. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 3-35.
27. Gallucci, C. (2008). Using sociocultural theory to link professional learning to organizational support in the context of school district instructional reform. American Journal of Education, 114, 541-581.
28. Gallucci, C., & Boatright, E.E. (2007). Gaining traction through professional coaching: A partnership between the Center for Educational Leadership and Highline School District (Interim Report No. 2). Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://depts.washington.edu/uwcel/resources/papers.html.
29. Gallucci, C., Boatright, E.E., Lysne, D., & Swinnerton, J. (2006). The pedagogy of third-party support for instructional improvement: A partnership between CEL and Highline School District. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://depts.washington.edu/uwcel/resources/papers.html.
30. Gallucci, C., & Swanson, J. (2008). Aiming high: Leadership for district-wide instructional improvement: A partnership between the Center for Educational Leadership and Norwalk-La Mirada Unified School District, Interim research report and case summary. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://depts.washington.edu/uwcel/resources/papers.html.
31. Gamoran, A., Porter, A.C., Smithson, J., & White, P.A. (1997). Upgrading high school mathematics instruction: Improving learning opportunities for low-achieving, low-income youth. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 325-338.
32. Garet, M.S., Porter, A.C., Desimone, L., Birman, B.F., & Yoon, K.S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915-945.
33. Gavelek, J.R., & Raphael, T.E. (1996). Changing talk about text: New roles for teachers and students. Language Arts, 73(3), 182-192.
34. Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization, 7(2), 211-223.
35. Gibson, S.A. (2005). Developing knowledge of coaching. Issues in Teacher Education, 14(2), 63-74.
36. Gredler, M.E. (2007). Of cabbages and kings: Concepts and inferences curiously attributed to Lev Vygotsky (Commentary on McVee, Dunsmore, and Gavelek, 2005). Review of Educational Research, 77, 233-238.
37. Harré, R. (1984). Personal being: A theory for individual psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Harré, R. (1986). Social sources of mental content and order. In J. Margolis, P. T. Manicas, R. Harré & P. F. Secord (Eds.), Psychology: Designing the discipline (pp. 91-127). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
39. Harré, R., Clarke, D., & De Carlo, N. (1985). Motives and mechanisms: An introduction to the psychology of action. London: Methuen.
40. Herrenkohl, L.R., & Wertsch, J.V. (1999). The use of cultural tools: Mastery and appropriation. In I. E. Sigel (Ed.), The development of mental representation: Theories and applications (pp. 415-435). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Hubbard, L., Mehan, H., & Stein, M.K. (2006). Reform as learning: School reform, organizational culture, and community politics in San Diego. New York: Routledge.
42. HyperRESEARCH (Version 2.6.1) [Computer software]. Randolph, MA: Researchware, Inc.
43. John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31, 191-206.
44. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1982). The coaching of teaching. Educational Leadership, 40(1), 4-10.
45. Knapp, M.S. (1997). Between systemic reforms and the mathematics and science classroom: The dynamics of innovation, implementation, and professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 2, 227-266.
46. Knapp, M.S., Copland, M.A., & Talbert, J.E. (2003). Leading for learning: Reflective tools for school and district leaders. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
47. Knight, J. (2004). Instructional coaches make progress through partnership: Intensive support can improve teaching. Journal of Staff Development, 25(2), 32-37.
48. Knight, J. (2006, April). Instructional coaching. The School Administrator, 63(4), 36-40.
49. Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice (pp. 3-32). New York: Cambridge University Press.
50. Learning Point Associates. (2004). Reading First coaching: A guide for coaches and Reading First leaders. Naperville, IL: Author.
51. Lord, B., Cress, K., & Miller, B. (2008). Teacher leadership in support of large-scale mathematics and science education reform. In M. M. Mangin & S. R. Stoelinga (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform (pp. 10-35). New York: Teachers College Press.
52. Lowenhaupt, R., & McKinney, S. (2007). Coaching in context: The role of relationships in the work of three literacy coaches. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
53. Mangin, M.M. (2008). The influence of organizational design on instructional teacher leadership. In M. M. Mangin & S. R. Stoelinga (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform (pp. 77-98). New York: Teachers College Press.
54. Mangin, M.M., & Stoelinga, S.R. (2008a). Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
55. Mangin, M.M., & Stoelinga, S.R. (2008b). Teacher leadership: What it is and why it matters. In M. M. Mangin & S. R. Stoelinga (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform (pp. 10-35). New York: Teachers College Press.
56. Manno, C.M., & Firestone, W.A. (2008). Content is the subject: How teacher leaders with different subject knowledge interact with teachers. In M. M. Mangin & S. R. Stoelinga (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform (pp. 36-54). New York: Teachers College Press.
57. Marsh, J.A., Kerr, K.A., Ikemoto, G.S., Darilek, H., Suttorp, M., Zimmer, R.W., & Barney, H. (2005). The role of districts in fostering instructional improvement. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
58. Marsh, J.A., McCombs, J.S., Lockwood, J.R., Martorell, F., Gershwin, D., Naftel, S.,et al.(2008). Supporting literacy across the sunshine state: A study of Florida middle school reading coaches. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
59. Marsh, J.A., McCombs, J.S., & Martorell, F. (2009). How instructional coaches support data-driven decision making: Policy implementation and effects in Florida middle schools. Educational Policy. Retrieved November 11, 2009, from http://epx.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/0895904809341467v1.
60. Marzolf, E.A. (2006). Contours and consequences of school-change coaching within a whole-school reform context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.
61. McVee, M.B., Dunsmore, K., & Gavelek, J.R. (2005). Schema theory revisited. Review of Educational Research, 75, 531-566.
62. McVee, M.B., Gavelek, J.R., & Dunsmore, K.L. (2007). Considerations of the social, individual, and embodied: A response to comments on "Schema Theory Revisited." Review of Educational Research, 77, 245-248.
63. Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
64. Mertens, D.M. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative & qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65. Moll, L.C. (2001). Through the mediation of others: Vygotskian research on teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 111-129). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
66. Neufeld, B., & Roper, D. (2002). Off to a good start: Year I of collaborative coaching and learning in the Effective Practice schools. Boston Education Matters, Inc.
67. Neufeld, B., & Roper, D. (2003). Coaching: A strategy for developing instructional capacity: Promises & practicalities. Boston Education Matters, Inc.
68. Neuman, S.B., & Cunningham, L. (2009). The impact of professional development and coaching on early language and literacy instructional practices. American Journal of Education, 46, 532-566.
69. Norton, J. (2001). A storybook breakthrough. Journal of Staff Development, 22, 22-25.
70. Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(3), 261-290.
71. Pearson, P.D., & Gallagher, M.C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 317-344.
72. Peck, C., Gallucci, C., Sloan, T., & Lippencott, A. (2009). Organizational learning and program renewal in teacher education: A sociocultural perspective on learning, innovation, and change. Educational Research Review, 4, 16-25.
73. Poglinco, S.M., Bach, A.J., Hovde, K., Rosenblum, S., Saunders, M., & Supovitz, J.A. (2003). The heart of the matter: The coaching model in America's Choice schools. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
74. Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of community of learners. Mind, Culture, & Society, 1, 209-220.
75. Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139-164). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
76. Sanders, W., & Horn, P. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) database: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12, 247-256.
77. Shanklin, N.L. (2007). What supports do literacy coaches need from administrators in order to succeed? Denver, CO: Literacy Coaching Clearinghouse.
78. Showers, B. (1985, April). Teachers coaching teachers. Educational Leadership, 42, 43-48.
79. Showers, B., & Joyce, B. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 12-16.
80. Smagorinsky, P., Cook, L.S., & Johnson, T.S. (2003). The twisting path of concept development in learning to teach. Teachers College Record, 105, 1399-1436.
81. Smith, A.T. (2006). The middle school literacy coach: Roles, contexts, and connections to teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.
82. Smith, A.T. (2009, March). Considering literacy coaching responsibilities in terms of teacher change. Literacy Coaching Clearinghouse. Available from http://www.literacycoachingonline.org/briefs/coaching_trajectory_a_smith.pdf.
83. Smylie, M.A., Conley, S., & Marks, H.M. (2002). Exploring new approaches to teacher leadership for school improvement. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 101(1), 162-188.
84. Spillane, J.P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J.B. (2004). Toward a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 3-34.
85. Spillane, J.P., & Zeuli, J.S. (1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 1-28.
86. Stake, R.E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
87. Stein, M.K., & Coburn, C.E. (2008). Architectures for learning: A comparative analysis of two urban districts. American Journal of Education, 114, 583-626.
88. Stein, M.K., & D'Amico, L. (2002). Inquiry at the crossroads of policy and learning: A study of a district-wide literacy initiative. Teachers College Record, 104, 1313-1344.
89. Suchman, L., Blomberg, J., Orr, J.E., & Trigg, R. (1999). Reconstructing technologies as social practice. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 392-408.
90. Supovitz, J.A. (2006). The case for district-based reform: Leading, building and sustaining school improvement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
91. Swanson, J. (2007). Learning at every level: A partnership between the Center for Educational leadership and Ridgeview School District, interim research report and case summary. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://depts.washington.edu/uwcel/resources/papers.html.
92. Swinnerton, J. (2007). Brokers and boundary crossers in an urban school district: Understanding central office coaches as instructional leaders. Journal of School Leadership, 17(2), 195-221.
93. Taylor, J.E. (2008). Instructional coaching: The state of the art. In M. M. Mangin & S. R. Stoelinga (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform (pp. 10-35). New York: Teachers College Press.
94. Thompson, C.L., & Zeuli, J.S. (1999). The frame and the tapestry: Standards-based reform and professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 341-375). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
95. Toll, C.A. (2006). The literacy coach's desk reference: Processes and perspectives for effective coaching. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
96. Togneri, W., & Anderson, S.L. (2003). Beyond islands of excellence: What districts can do to improve instruction and achievement in all schools. Washington, DC: The Learning First Alliance and the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
97. Tung, R., Ouimette, M., & Feldman, J. (2004). The challenge of coaching: Providing cohesion among multiple reform agendas. Boston: Center for Collaborative Education.
98. Valli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 519-558.
99. Van Lare, M., Yoon, I., & Gallucci, C. (2008). Orchestrating leadership in district-wide reform: A report for Marysville School District. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://depts.washington.edu/uwcel/resources/papers.html.
100. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
101. Wei, R.C., Darling-Hammond, L., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009, February). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad: Technical report. Dallas, TX: National Staff Development Council. Available from www.nsdc.org/stateproflearning.cfm.
102. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
103. Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
104. West, L., & Staub, F. (2003). Content focused coaching: Transforming mathematics lessons. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
105. Westbury, I. (1993). American and Japanese achievement again: A response to Baker. Educational Researcher, 22(3), 21-25.
106. Wolcott, H.F. (1990). Writing up qualitative research (Qualitative research methods, Vol. 20). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
107. Wolcott, H.F. (2005). The art of fieldwork. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.