Regular and Platform Switching: Bone Stress Analysis Varying Implant Type

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 160-166

  Gurgel Juarez, Nália Cecília ^a   de Almeida, Erika Oliveira ^b,c   Rocha, Eduardo Passos ^b   Júnior, Amílcar Chagas Freitas ^d   Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera ^b   de Vargas, Luis Carlos Merçon ^a   Kina, Sidney ^a   França, Fabiana Mantovani Gomes ^a  

^a SÃO LEOPOLDO MANDIC INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Brazil)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d POTIGUAR UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bone; Finite element analysis; Implant dentistry; Loading; Stress

Indexed keywords

IPS E.MAX PRESS; RESIN CEMENT; VARIOLINK;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DENTURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INCISOR; MATERIALS TESTING; MAXILLA; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; YOUNG MODULUS;

BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTIC MODULUS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INCISOR; MATERIALS TESTING; MAXILLA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OSSEOINTEGRATION; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84859730655     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: 1532849X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00801.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Oh T-J, Yoon J, Misch CE, et al: The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science? J Periodontol 2002;73:322-333.
2. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, et al: A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.
3. Cox JF, Zarb GA: The longitudinal clinical efficacy of osseointegrated dental implants: a 3-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:91-100.
4. Isidor F: Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to oclusal overload or plaque accumulation. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:1-9.
5. Holmgren EP, Seckinger RJ, Kilgren LM, et al: Evaluating parameters of osseo integrated dental implants using finite element analysis-a two dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant shape, and load direction. J Oral Implantol 1998;24:80-88.
6. Stegaroiu R, Sato T, Kusakari H, et al: Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:82-90.
7. Tonetti MS, Schmid J: Pathogenesis of implant failures. Periodontol 2000 1994;4:127-138.
8. Yokoyama S, Wakabayashi N, Shiota M, et al: The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:234-240.
9. Li J, Li H, Shi L, et al: A mathematical model for simulating the bone remodeling process under mechanical stimulus. Dent Mater 2007;23:1073-1078.
10. Chun HJ, Shin HS, Han CH, et al: Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:195-202.
11. Maeda Y, Miura J, Taki I, et al: Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale? Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:581-584.
12. Verri FR, Pellizzer EP, Rocha EP, et al: Influence of length and diameter of implants associated with distal extension removable partial dentures. Implant Dent 2007;16:270-280.
13. Quaresma SET, Cury PR, Sendyk WR, et al: A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone. J Oral Implantol 2008;36:1-6.
14. Huang HL, Hsu JT, Fuh LJ, et al: Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a non-linear finite element study. J Dent 2008;36:409-417.
15. Schrotenboer J, Tsao YP, Kinariwala V, et al: Effect of microthreads and platform switching on crestal bone stress levels: a finite element analysis. J Periodontol 2008;79:2166-2172.
16. Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, et al: The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:422-431.
17. Ding X, Zhu X-H, Liao S-H, et al: Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthodont 2009;20:1-10.
18. Okumura N, Stegaroiu R, Kitamura E, et al: Influence of maxillary cortical bone thickness, implant design and implant diameter on stress around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthodont Res 2010;54:133-142.
19. Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, et al: The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:81-90.
20. Lindhe J, Berglundh T, Ericsson I, et al: Experimental breakdown of peri-implant and periodontal tissues. A study in the beagle dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:9-16.
21. Hermann JS, Schoofield JD, Schenk RK, et al: Influence of the size of microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2001;72:1372-1383.
22. Todescan FF, Pustiglioni FE, Imbronito AV, et al: Influence of the microgap in the peri-implant hard and soft tissues: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:467-472.
23. Assenza B: Crestal bone remodeling in loaded and unloaded implant and the microgap: a histological study. Implant Dent 2003;12:235-241.
24. Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, et al: Persistent acute inflammation at the implant-abutment interface. J Dent Res 2003;82:232-237.
25. Alomrani AN, Hermann JS, Jones AA, et al: The effect of a machined collar on coronal hard tissue around titanium implants: a radiographic study in the canine mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:677-686.
26. Jung RE, Jones AA, Higginbottom FL, et al: The influence of non-matching implant and abutment diameters on radiographic crestal bone levels in dogs. J Periodontol 2008;79:260-270.
27. Ericsson I, Berglundh T, Marinello CP, et al: Longstanding plaque and gingivitis at Implants and teeth in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:99-103.
28. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Wennstrom J, et al: The peri-implant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:212-219.
29. Berglundh T, Lindhe J: Dimension of the peri-implant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:971-973.
30. Cochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK, et al: Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implant-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997;68:186-198.
31. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J: The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:568-572.
32. Hermann JS, Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, et al: Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Peridontol 1997;68:1117-1130.
33. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Glantz P-O, et al: The mucosal attachment at different abutments. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:721-727.
34. Jung YC, Han CH, Lee KW: A 1-year radiographic evaluation of marginal bone around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:811-818.
35. Shin T-K, Han C-H, Heo S-J, et al: Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;20:789-794.
36. Lee D-W, Choi Y-S, Park K-H, et al: Effect of microthread on the maintenance of marginal bone level: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:465-470.
37. Weng D, Nagata MJ, Bell M, et al: Influence of microgap location and configuration on the periimplant bone morphology in submerged implants. An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1141-1147.
38. Evans CD, Chen ST: Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:73-80.
39. Tarnow D, Elian N, Fletcher P, et al: Vertical distance from the crest of bone to the height of the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants. J Periodontol 2003;74:1785-1788.
40. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS: Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:9-17.
41. Gardner DM: Platform switching as a means to achieving implant esthetics-a case study. N Y State Dent J 2005;71:34-37.
42. Guirado JLC, Yuguero MRS, Zamora GP, et al: Immediate provisionalization on a new implant design for esthetic restoration and preserving crestal bone. Implant Dent 2007;16:155-161.
43. Hurzeler M, Fickl S, Zuhr O, et al: Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments: preliminary data from a prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:33-39.
44. Canullo L, Rasperini G: Preservation of peri-implant soft and hard tissues using platform switching of implants placed in immediate extraction sockets: a proof-of-concept study with 12- to 36-month follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:995-1000.
45. Hermann F, Lerner H, Palti A: Facts influencing the preservation of the periimplant marginal bone. Implant Dent 2007;16:165-172.
46. Becker J, Ferrari D, Herten M, et al: Influence of platform switching on crestal bone changes at non-submerged titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:1089-1096.
47. Degidi M, Iezzi G, Scarano A, et al: Immediately loaded titanium implant with a tissue-stabilizing/maintaining design ('beyond platform switch') retrieved from man after 4 weeks: a histological and histomorphometrical evaluation. A case report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;19:276-282.
48. Cappiello M, Luongo R, Di Iorio D, et al: Evaluation of peri-implant bone loss around platform-switched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:347-355.
49. Guirado JLC, Ruiz AJO, Moreno GG, et al: Immediate loading and immediate restoration in 105 expanded-platform implants via the Diem System after a 16-month follow-up period. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13:576-581.
50. Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Vela-Nebot X, Segala-Torres M, et al: Biomechanical repercussions of bone resorption related to biologic width: a finite element analysis of three implant-abutment configurations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29:479-487.
51. Balfour A, O'Brien GR: Comparative study of antirotational single tooth abutments. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:36-43.
52. Möllersten L, Lockowandt P, Lindén L-A: Comparison of strength and failure mode of seven implant systems: an in vitro test. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:582-591.
53. Kitagawa T, Tanimoto Y, Odaki M, et al: Influence of implant/abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;75:457-463.
54. Krennmair G, Schmidinger S, Waldenberger O: Single-tooth replacement with the Frialit-2 system: a retrospective clinical analysis of 146 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:78-85.
55. Maeda Y, Satoh T, Sogo M: In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections: a short communication. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:75-78.
56. Bernardes SR, de Araujo CA, Neto AJ, et al: Photoelastic analysis of stress patterns from different implant-abutment interfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:781-790.
57. Saab XE, Griggs JA, Powers JM, et al: Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: a finite element study. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:85-92.
58. Lekholm U, Zarb GA: Patient selection and preparation. In Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds): Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago, Quintessence, 1985, pp. 199-209.
59. Truhlar RS, Orenstein IH, Morris HF, et al: Distribution of bone quality in patients receiving endosseous dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:38-45.
60. Cook RD, Malkus DS, Plesha ME: Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis. New York, Wiley, 2001, pp.542-573.
61. Dejak B, Mlotkowski A: Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:131-140.
62. Yokoyama S, Wakabayashi N, Shiota M, et al: The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:234-240.