Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: A finite element study

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 85-92

  Saab, Xavier E ^a   Griggs, Jason A ^b   Powers, John M ^a   Engelmeier, Robert L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DENTAL BRANCH AT HOUSTON   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; JAW; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; WEIGHT BEARING;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAXILLA; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 33847248335     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Branemark P.I., Hansson B.O., Adell R., Breine U., Lindstrom J., Hallen O., et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plastic Reconstr Surg Suppl 16 (1977) 1-132
2. Adell R., Lekholm U., Rokler B., and Branemark P.I. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 10 (1981) 387-416
3. Atwood D.A. Some clinical factors related to rate of resorption of residual ridges. J Prosthet Dent 12 (1962) 441-450
4. McHorris W.H. The importance of anterior teeth. J Gnath 1 (1982) 19-36
5. Papavasiliou G., Kamposiora P., Bayne S.C., and Felton D.A. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent 76 (1996) 633-640
6. Eger D., Gunsolley J.C., and Feldman S. Comparison of angled and standard abutments and their effect on clinical outcomes: a preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15 (2000) 819-823
7. Sethi A., Kaus T., and Sochor P. The use of angulated abutments in implant dentistry: five-year clinical results of an ongoing prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15 (2000) 801-810
8. Kenney R., and Richards M.W. Photoelastic stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 80 (1998) 559-564
9. O'Mahony A.M., Williams J.L., and Spencer P. Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri-implant stress and strain under oblique loading. Clin Oral Implants Res 12 (2001) 648-657
10. Borchers L., and Reichart P. Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development. J Dent Res 62 (1983) 155-159
11. Benzing U.R., Gall H., and Weber H. Biomechanical aspects of two different implant-prosthetic concepts for edentulous maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 10 (1995) 188-198
12. Stegaroiu R., Sato T., Kusakari H., and Miyakawa O. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13 (1998) 82-90
13. Van Oosterwyck H., Duyck J., Vander Sloten J., Van der Perre G., De Cooman M., Lievens S., et al. The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 9 (1998) 407-418
14. Patra A.K., DePaolo J.M., D'Souza K.S., DeTolla D., and Meenaghan M.A. Guidelines for analysis and redesign of dental implants. Implant Dent 7 (1998) 355-368
15. Canay S., Hersek N., Akpinar I., and Asik Z. Comparison of stress distribution around vertical and angled implants with finite element analysis. Quintessence Int 27 (1996) 591-598
16. Geng J.P., Ma Q.S., Xu W., Tan K.B., and Liu G.R. Finite element analysis of four thread-form configurations in a stepped screw implant. J Oral Rehabil 31 (2004) 233-239
17. Geng J.P., Xu W., Tan K.B., and Liu G.R. Finite element analysis of an osseointegrated stepped screw dental implant. J Oral Implantol 30 (2004) 223-233
18. Geramy A., and Morgano S.M. Finite element analysis of three designs of an implant-supported molar crown. J Prosthet Dent 92 (2004) 434-440
19. Ellis D.K., and Natali A. Dental biomechanics (2003), Taylor & Francis, New York p. 1-19
20. Tsai S.W., and Wu E.M. General theory of strength for anisotropic materials. J Composite Materials 5 (1971) 58-80
21. Frost H.M. Bone "mass" and the "mechanostat": a proposal. Anat Rec 219 (1987) 1-9
22. Lekholm U., and Zarb G.A. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark P.-I., Zarb G.A., and Albrektsson T. (Eds). Tissue-integrated prosthesis: osseointegration in clinical dentistry (1985), Quintessence, Chicago 199-209
23. Boas M.L. Mathematical methods in the physical sciences. 3rd ed. (2005), John Wiley, New York p. 410-3
24. Schaeffer A. Behavior of the axis of human incisor teeth during growth. Angle Orthodont 19 (1949) 254-275
25. Bjork A., and Palling M. Adolescent age changes in sagittal jaw relation, alveolar prognathy, and incisal inclination. Acta Odontol Scand 12 (1955) 201-232
26. Noyes H.J., Rushing C.H., and Sims H.A. The angle of axial inclination of human central incisor teeth. Angle Orthod 13 (1943) 60-68
27. Geng J.P., Tan K., and Liu G.R. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 85 (2001) 585-598
28. Korioth T.W., and Versluis A. Modeling the mechanical behavior of the jaws and their related structures by finite element (FE) analysis. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 8 (1997) 90-104
29. DeTolla D.H., Adreana S., Patra A., Buhite R., and Comella B. Role of the finite element model in dental implants. J Oral Implantol 26 (2000) 77-81
30. Clelland N.L., Lee J.K., Bimbenet O.C., and Gilat A. Use of an axisymmetric finite element method to compare maxillary bone variables for a loaded implant. J Prosthodont 2 (1993) 183-189
31. Cowin S.C. Bone mechanics handbook. 2nd ed. (2001), CRC Press, Boca Raton (FL) p. 1.1-1.23
32. Akca K., and Iplikcioglu H. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 16 (2001) 722-730
33. Meijer G.J., Starmans F.J., de Putter C., and van Blitterswijk C.A. The influence of a flexible coating on the bone stress around dental implants. J Oral Rehabil 22 (1995) 105-111
34. Menicucci G., Lorenzetti M., Pera P., and Preti G. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13 (1998) 369-376
35. Sertgoz A. Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. Int J Prosthodont 10 (1997) 19-27
36. Teixeira E.R., Sato Y., Akagawa Y., and Shindoi N. A comparative evaluation of mandibular finite element models with different lengths and elements for implant biomechanics. J Oral Rehabil 25 (1998) 299-303
37. van Zyl P.P., Grundling N.L., Jooste C.H., and Terblanche E. Three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible incorporating six osseointegrated implants for stress analysis of mandibular cantilever prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 10 (1995) 51-57
38. Weinstein A.M., Klawitter J.J., Anand S.C., and Schuessler R. Stress analysis of porous rooted dental implants. J Dent Res 55 (1976) 772-777
39. Bell G.H., Dunbar O., Beck J.S., and Gibb A. Variations in strength of vertebrae with age and their relation to osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Res 1 (1967) 75-86
40. Rho J.Y., Ashman R.B., and Turner C.H. Young's modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material: ultrasonic and microtensile measurements. J Biomech 26 (1993) 111-119
41. Hellsing G. On the regulation of interincisor bite force in man. J Oral Rehabil 7 (1980) 403-411
42. Helkimo E., Carlsson G.E., and Helkimo M. Bite force and state of dentition. Acta Odontol Scand 35 (1977) 297-303
43. Clelland N.L., Lee J.K., Bimbenet O.C., and Brantley W.A. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of angled abutments for an implant placed in the anterior maxilla. J Prosthodont 4 (1995) 95-100
44. Siegele D., and Soltesz U. Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape distribution in the jaw bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 4 (1989) 333-340
45. Matsushita Y., Kitoh M., Mizuta K., Ikeda H., and Suetsugu T. Two-dimensional FEM analysis of hydroxyapatite implants: diameter effects on stress distribution. J Oral Implantol 16 (1990) 6-11
46. Akpinar I., Demirel F., Parnas L., and Sahin S. A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extension fixed prosthesis. Quintessence Int 27 (1996) 11-17
47. Holmes D.C., and Loftus J.T. Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants. J Oral Implantol 23 (1997) 104-111
48. Holmgren E.P., Seckinger R.J., Kilgren L.M., and Mante F. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis - a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J Oral Implantol 24 (1998) 80-88
49. Ciftci Y., and Canay S. Stress distribution on the metal framework of the implant-supported fixed prosthesis using different veneering materials. Int J Prosthodont 14 (2001) 406-411