Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 789-794

  Shin, Young Kyu ^a   Han, Chong Hyun ^a   Heo, Seong Joo ^b   Kim, Sunjai ^a   Chun, Heoung Jae ^c  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^c Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Machined neck; Marginal bone level; Microthreads; Rough surface

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOLYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 33750556238     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson RA. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants. A review and proposed criteria for success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
2. Adell R, Lekhom U, Rockler B, Brånemark P-I. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.
3. Jung YC, Han CH, Lee KW. A 1 year radiographic evaluation of marginal bone around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:811-818.
4. Linkow LI, Cherchève R. Theories and techniques of oral implantology. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 1970.
5. Kitoh M, Matsushita Y, Yamane S, Ikeda H, Suetsugu T. The stress distribution of the hydroxyapatite implant under the vertical load by the two-dimensional finite element method. J Oral Implantol 1988;14:65-72.
6. Meijer HJA, Starmans FJM, Steen WHA, Bosman F. A three-dimensional, finite element analysis of bone around dental implants in an edentulous human mandible. Arch Oral Biol 1993;38:491-496.
7. Guo EX. Mechanical properties of cortical bone and cancellous bone tissue. In: Cowin SC (ed). Bone Mechanics Handbook, ed 2. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2001:1-23.
8. Oh TJ, Yoon JK, Misch CE, Wang HL. The causes of early implant bone loss: Myth or science? J Peridontol 2002;73:322-333.
9. Hansson S. The implant neck: Smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:394-405.
10. Zechner W, Trinkl N, Watzak G, et al. Radiologic follow-up of peri-implant bone loss around machine-surfaced and rough-surfaced interforaminal implants in the mandible functionally loaded for 3 to 7 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:216-221.
11. Norton MR. Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro- and microstructure. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:91-99.
12. Misch CE, Bidez MW. A scientific rationale for dental implant design. In: Misch CE (ed). Contemporary Implant Dentistry, ed 2. St Louis: Mosby, 1999:329-343.
13. Jemt T, Lekhom U, Gröndahl K. A 3-year follow-up study of early single implant restoration ad modum Brånemark. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1990;10:341-349.
14. Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants: Considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:401-412.
15. Wilke HJ, Claes L, Steinemann S. The influence of various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between implants and bone. Advances in Biomaterials 1990;9:309-314.
16. Hansson S, Norton M. The relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone anchored implants: A biomechanical approach. In: Hansson S (ed). Toward an Optimized Dental Implant and Bridge Design: A Biomechanical Approach [thesis]. Göteborg, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology, 1997.
17. Brägger U, Häfeli U, Huber B, Hämmerle CHF, Lang NP. Evaluation of postsurgical crestal bone levels adjacent to non-submerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:218-224.
18. Palmer RM, Smith BJ, Palmer PJ, Floyd PD. A prospective study of Astra single tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8: 173-179.
19. Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005;25:113-119.
20. Ericsson I, Nilner K, Klinge B, Glantz P-O. Radiographical and histological characteristics of submerged and nonsubmerged titanium implants 1996;7:20-26.
21. Persson LG, Lekholm U, Leonhardt A, Dahlen G, Lindhe J. Bacterial colonization on internal surfaces of Brånemark system implant components. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:90-95.