Photoelastic analysis of stress patterns from different implant-abutment interfaces

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 781-789

  Bernardes, Sérgio Rocha ^a   de Araújo, Cleudmar Amaral ^a   Neto, Alfredo Júlio Fernandes ^a   Júnior, Paulo Simamoto ^a   das Neves, Flávio Domingues ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF UBERLÂNDIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Abutments; Biomechanics; Bone loss; Connections; Dental implant; Photoelasticity; Stress analysis

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; TITANIUM;

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; ELASTICITY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ACRYLIC RESINS; AREA UNDER CURVE; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, ANATOMIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 77649211787     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Jokstad A, Braegger U, Brunski JB, Carr AB, Naert I, Wennerberg A. Quality of dental implants. Int Dent J 2003; 53(6, suppl 2): 409-443.
2. Finger IM, Castellon P, Elian N. The evolution of external and internal implant/abutment connections. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2003; 8: 625-634.
3. Chun H-J, Shin H-K, Han C-H, Lee S-H. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 195-202.
4. Çehreli MC, Akça K, Iplikçioglu H. Force transmission of oneand two-piece Morse-taper oral implants: A nonlinear finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 481-489.
5. Çehreli MC, Iplikcioglu H. In vitro strain gauge analysis of axial and off-axial loading on implant supported fixed partial dentures. Implant Dent 2002; 11: 286-292.
6. Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 290-298.
7. Taylor TD, Agar JR. Twenty years of progress in implant prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 89-95.
8. Haraldson T. A photoelastic study of some biomechanical factors affecting the anchorage of osseointegrated implants in the jaw. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 14: 209-214.
9. Iplikçioglu H, Akça K, Çehreli M, Sahin S. Comparison of nonlinear finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on a Morse taper implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 258-265.
10. Sevimay M, Turhan F, Kiliçarslan MA, Eskistascioglu G. Three dimensional finite-element analysis of the effective of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 227-234.
11. Balshi TJ, Hernandez RE, Pryszlak MC, Rangert B. A comparative study of one implant versus two replacing a single molar. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11: 372-378.
12. Cehreli M, Duyck J, De Cooman M, Puers R, Naert I. Implant design and interface force transfer. A photoelastic and straingauge analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 249-257.
13. Chun H-J, Cheong S-Y, Han J-H, et al. Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite elements analysis. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 565-574.
14. Norton MR. Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro and microstructure. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9: 91-99.
15. Quirynen M, Naert I, Van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark System. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992; 3: 104-111.
16. Dally JW, Riley WF (eds). Experimental Stress Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
17. Wood MR, Vermilyea SG. A review of selected dental literature on evidence-based treatment planning for dental implants: Report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 5: 447-462.
18. Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ. Two-implant-supported single molar replacement: Interdental space requirements and comparison to alternative options. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997; 17: 426-435.
19. Himmlová L, Dostálová T, Kácovský A, Konvicková S. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: A finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 20-25.
20. Hansson S. A conical implant-abutment interface at the level of the marginal bone improve the distribution of stress in the supporting bone. An axisymmetric finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 286-293.
21. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The longterm efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1: 11-25.