A mathematical model for simulating the bone remodeling process under mechanical stimulus

Dental Materials

Volumn 23, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1073-1078

  Li, Jianying ^a   Li, Haiyan ^a   Shi, Li ^a   Fok, Alex S L ^a   Ucer, Cemal ^b   Devlin, Hugh ^b   Horner, Keith ^b   Silikas, Nick ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bone remodeling; Dental implant; Finite element analysis; Mathematic models; Overload resorption

Indexed keywords

BONE REMODELING; DENSITY CHANGE RATE; OVERLOAD RESORPTION;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BONE CEMENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

DENTAL PROSTHESES;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; MASTICATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; OSTEOLYSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; WEIGHT BEARING;

BIOMECHANICS; BITE FORCE; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; BONE RESORPTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 34447646710     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. In: Wolff J. (Ed). The law of bone remodeling/translated by Maquet PGJ and Furlong R (1986), Springer-Verlag, New York
2. Frost H.M. Presence of microscopic cracks in vivo in bone. Bulletin of Henry ford hospital 8 (1960) 25-35
3. Burr D.B., Martin R.B., Schaffler M.B., and Radin E.L. Bone remodeling in response to in vivo fatigue microdamage. J Biomech 18 3 (1985) 189-200
4. Frost H.M. Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 1. Redefining Wolff's Law: the bone modeling problem. Anat Rec 226 (1990) 403-413
5. Beaupre G.S., Orr T.E., and Carter D.R. An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling-theoretical development. J Orthop Res 8 (1990) 651-661
6. Beaupre G.S., Orr T.E., and Carter D.R. An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling-application: a preliminary remodeling simulation. J Orthop Res 8 (1990) 662-670
7. Huiskes R., Weinans H., Grootenboer H.J., Dalstra M., Fudala B., and Slooff T.J. Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. J Biomech 20 (1987) 1135-1150
8. McNamara B.P., Taylor D., and Prendergast P.J. Computer prediction of adaptive bone remodeling around noncemented femoral prostheses: the relationship between damage-based and strain-based algorithms. Med Eng Phys 19 (1997) 454-463
9. Prendergast P.J., and Taylor D. Prediction of bone adaptation using damage accumulation. J Biomech 27 8 (1994) 1067-1076
10. Huiskes R., and Nunamaker D. Local stresses and bone adaption around orthopaedic implants. Calcif Tissue Int 36 (1984) S110-S117
11. Quirynen M., Naert I., and van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 3 (1992) 104-111
12. Crupi V., Guglielmino E., Rosa G.L., Sloten J.V., and Oosterwyck H.V. Numerical analysis of bone adaptation around an oral implant due to overload stress. Proc Instn Mech Engrs Part H: J Eng Med 218 (2004) 407-415
13. Frost H.M. Wolff's Law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod 64 3 (1994) 175-188
14. Weinans H., Huiskes R., and Grootenboer H.J. The behavior of adaptive bone-remodeling simulatioin models. J Biomech 25 (1992) 1425-1441
15. Carter D.R., and Hayes W.C. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg 59 (1977) 954-962
16. ScanFE and ScanIP reference guide. Simpleware Ltd., Innovation centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
17. Nyström E., Ahlqvist J., Gunne J., and Kahnberg K.E. 10-year follow-up of onlay bone grafts and implants in severely resorbed maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33 (2004) 258-262