Influence of length and diameter of implants associated with distal extension removable partial dentures

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 270-280

  Verri, Fellippo Ramos ^a,b   Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza ^a   Rocha, Eduardo Passos ^a   Pereira, João Antônio ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b Dentistry Faculty of Araçatuba UNESP ^*  (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Dental implant; Finite element analysis; Removable partial denture

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE, PARTIAL, REMOVABLE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MANDIBLE;

EID: 34548552947     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31805007aa     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Rocha EP, Luersen MA, Pellizzer EP, et al. Distal-extension removable partial denture associated with an osseointegrated implant. Study by the finite element method. J Dent Res. 2003;82:B-254.
2. Chou TM, Eick JD, Moore JD, et al. Stereophotogrammetric analysis of abutment tooth movement In distal-extension removable partial dentures with intracoronal attachments and clasps. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66:343-349.
3. el Charkawi HG, el Wakad MT. Effect of splinting on load distribution of extracoronal attachment with distal extension prosthesis In vitro. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76:315-320.
4. Itoh H, Caputo AA, Wylie R, et al. Effects of periodontal support and fixed splinting on load transfer by removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79:465-471.
5. Morikawa M, Masumi S, Kido H, et al. Analysis of abutment tooth movement utilizing mandibular kinesiography (MKG). Part 2. Effects of clasp design in unilateral free-end denture. Dent Mater J. 1989;8:56-64.
6. Preiskel HW. Impression techniques for attachment-retained distal extension removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1971;25:620-628.
7. Tebrock OC, Rohen RM, Fenster RK, et al. The effect of various clasping systems on the mobility of abutment teeth for distal-extension removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;41:511-516.
8. Craig RG, Farah JW. Stresses from loading distal-extension removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;39:274-277.
9. Griffin TJ, Cheung WS. The use of short, wide implants in posterior areas with reduced bone height: A retrospective investigation. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:139-144.
10. Pellecchia M, Pellecchla R, Emtiaz S. Distal extension mandibular removable partial denture connected to an anterior fixed implant-supported prosthesis: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:607-612.
11. Starr NL. The distal extension case: An alternative restorative design for Implant prosthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001;21:61-67.
12. Giffin KM. Solving the distal extension removable partial denture base movement dilemma: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76:347-349.
13. Keltjens HM, Kayser AF, Hertel R, et al. Distal extension removable partial dentures supported by implants and residual teeth: Considerations and case reports. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:208-213.
14. Holmgren EP, Seckinger RJ, Kilgren LM, et al. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis-A two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J Oral Implantai. 1998;24:80-88.
15. Jarvis WC. Biomechanical advantages of wide-diameter implants. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1997;18:687-692.
16. Misch CE. Implant design considerations for the posterior regions of the mouth. Implant Dent. 1999;8:376-386.
17. Tuncelli B, Poyrazoglu E, Koyluoglu AM, et al. Comparison of load transfer by implant abutments of various diameters. Eur J Prosthodont Restar Dent. 1997;5:79-83.
18. Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, et al. Survival of the Branemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: A 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:639-645.
19. Lekholm U, van Steenberghe D, Herrmann I, et al. Osseointegrated implants In the treatment of partially edentulous jaws: A prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:627-635.
20. Darbar UR, Huggett R, Harrison A, et al. Finite element analysis of stress distribution at the tooth-denture base interface of acrylic resin teeth debonding from the denture base. J Prosthet Dent. 1995;74:591-594.
21. Coolidge ED. The thickness of the human periodontal membrane. J Am Dent Assoc. 1937;24:1260-1270.
22. Gargiulo AW, Wentz FM, Orban B. Dimensions and relations of the dentogingival junction In humans. J Periodontol. 1961;32:261-267.
23. Farah JW, Craig RG, Meroueh KA. Finite element analysis of a mandibular model. J Oral Rehabil. 1988;15:615-624.
24. Ko CC, Chu CS, Chung KH, et al. Effects of posts on dentin stress distribution In pulpless teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:421-427.
25. Sertgoz A, Gunever S. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76:165-169.
26. Williams DF. In: Biocompatibility of Clinical Implant Materials. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1981:99-127.
27. Lum LB. A biomechanical rationale for the use of short implants. J Oral Implantol. 1991;17:126-131.
28. Battistuzzi GFP, van Slooten H, Käyser AF. Management of an anterior defect with a removable partial denture supported by implants and residual teeth: A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7:112-115.
29. McAndrew R. Prosthodontic rehabilitation with a swing-lock removable partial denture and a single osseointegrated implant: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88:128-131.
30. Duyck J, Naert IE, Van Oosterwyck H, et al. Biomechanics of oral implants: A review of the literature. Technol Health Care. 1997;5:253-273.
31. Pierrisnard L, Renouard F, Renaut P, et al. Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5:254-262.
32. Iplikcioglu H, Akca K. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution In the bone. J Dent. 2002;30:41-46.
33. Meijer HJ, Kuiper JH, Starmans FJ, et al. Stress distribution around dental implants: Influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:96-102.
34. Himmlova L, Dostalova T, Kacovsky A, et al. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: A finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91:20-25.
35. Kido H, Schulz EE, Kumar A, et al. Implant diameter and bone density: Effect on initial stability and pull-out resistance. J Oral Implantol. 1997;23:163-169.
36. Sato Y, Shindoi N, Hosokawa R, et al. A biomechanical effect of wide implant placement and offset placement of three implants in the posterior partially edentulous region. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27:15-21.
37. Murphy WM, Williams KR, Gregory MC. Stress In bone adjacent to dental implants. J Oral Rehabil. 1995;22:897-903.
38. Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85:585-598.