Fuzzy complexes: A more stochastic view of protein function

Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

Volumn 725, Issue , 2012, Pages 1-14

  Fuxreiter, Monika ^a   Tompa, Peter ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMYLOID; BETA CATENIN; CYCLIC AMP RESPONSIVE ELEMENT BINDING PROTEIN BINDING PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR TCF4; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; PROTEIN;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR LOCALIZATION SIGNAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN POLYMORPHISM; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; STOCHASTIC MODEL; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; TRANSLATION REGULATION; VIRUS ASSEMBLY; ANIMAL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

EUKARYOTA;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 84859494186     PISSN: 00652598     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0659-4_1     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Warshel A, Sharma PK, Kato M et al. Electrostaticbasis for enzyme catalysis. Chem Rev 2006;106:3210-3235.
2. Henzler-Wildman KA, Thai V, Lei M et al. Intrinsic motions along an enzymatic reaction trajectory. Nature 2007; 450:838-44.
3. ToddAE, OrengoCA, Thornton JM. Plasticity of enzyme active sites. Trends Biochem Sci 2002; 27:419-26.
4. Freedman SJ, Sun ZY, Kung AL et al. Structural basis for negative regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor-lalpha by CITED2. Nat Struct Biol 2003; 10:504-12.
5. del Sol A, TsaiCJ, MaB etal. The origin of allosteric functional modulation: multiple pre-existing pathways. Structure 2009; 17:1042-50.
6. Romero P, Obradovic Z, Kissinger CR et al. Thousands of proteins likely to have long disordered regions. Pac Symp Biocomputing 1998; 3:437-48.
7. Tompa P. Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 2002; 27:527-33.
8. Wright PE,DysonHJ. Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessingtheproteinstructure-functionparadigm. JMol Biol 1999; 293:321-31.
9. Sickmeier M, Hamilton JA, LeGall T et al. DisProt: the Database of Disordered Proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:D786-D793.
10. Dunker AK, Obradovic Z, Romero P et al. Intrinsic protein disorder in complete genomes. Genome Inform Ser Workshop Genome Inform 2000; 11:161-71.
11. Tompa P, Dosztanyi Z, Simon I. Prevalent structural disorder in E. coli and S. cerevisiae proteomes. J Proteome Res 2006; 5:1996-2000.
12. Ward JJ, Sodhi JS, McGuffmLJet al. Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. J Mol Biol 2004; 337:635-45.
13. Xie H, Vucetic S, Iakoucheva LM et al. Functional anthology of intrinsic disorder. 1. Biological processes and functions ofproteins with long disordered regions. J Proteome Res 2007; 6:1882-98.
14. Fuxreiter M, Tompa P, Simon I et al. Malleable machines take shape in eukaryotic transcriptional regulation. Nat Chem Biol 2008; 4:728-37.
15. Dunker AK, Brown CJ, Lawson JD et al. Intrinsic disorder and protein function. Biochemistry 2002; 41:6573-82.
16. Uversky VN, Oldfield CJ, Dunker AK. Showing your ID: intrinsic disorder as an ID for recognition, regulation and cell signaling. J Mol Recognit 2005; 18:343-84.
17. Tompa P.The interplay between structure and function in intrinsically unstructured proteins. FEBS Lett 2005; 579:3346-54.
18. James LC, Roversi P, Tawfik DS. Antibody multispecificity mediated by conformational diversity. Science 2003; 299:1362-67.
19. Wright PE, Dyson HJ. Linking folding and binding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009; 19:31-38.
20. Fuxreiter M, Simon I, Friedrich P et al. Preformed structural elements feature in partner recognition by intrinsically unstructured proteins. J Mol Biol 2004; 338:1015-26.
21. Patel SS, Belmont BJ, Sante JM et al. Natively unfolded nucleoporins gate protein diffusion across the nuclear pore complex. Cell 2007; 129:83-96.
22. Tompa P, Fuxreiter M. Fuzzy complexes: polymorphism and structural disorder in protein-protein interactions. Trends Biochem Sci 2008; 33:2-8.
23. Fontes MR, Teh T, Toth G etal. Role of flanking sequences and phosphorylation in the recognition of the simian-virus-40 large T-antigen nuclear localization sequences by importin-alpha. Biochem J 2003; 375:339-49.
24. Graham TA, Ferkey DM, Mao F et al. Tcf4 can speciically recognize beta-catenin using alternative conformations. Nat Struct Biol 2001; 8:1048-52.
25. Renault L, Bugyi B, Carlier MF. Spire and Cordon-bleu: multifunctional regulators of actin dynamics. Trends Cell Biol 2008; 18:494-504.
26. HaarmannCS, Green D, Casarotto MG et al. The random-coil 'C fragment of the dihydropyridine receptor II-III loop can activate or inhibit native skeletal ryanodine receptors. Biochem J 2003; 372:305-16.
27. Bhattacharyya RP, Remenyi A, Good MC et al. The Ste5 scaffold allosterically modulates signaling output ofthe yeast mating pathway. Science 2006; 311:822-26.
28. van Leeuwen HC, Strating MJ, Rensen M et al. Linker length and composition inluence the lexibility of Oct-1 DNA binding. C. EMBO J 1997; 16:2043-53.
29. RockRS, Ramamurthy B, Dunn AR et al. A flexible domain is essential for the largestep size andprocessivity of myosin VI. Mol Cell 2005; 17:603-09.
30. Neduva V, Russell RB. Linear motifs: evolutionary interaction switches. FEBS Lett 2005; 579:3342-45.
31. Fuxreiter M, Tompa P, Simon I. Local structural disorder imparts plasticity on linear motifs. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:950-56.
32. Zor T, Mayr BM, Dyson HJ etal. Roles of phosphorylation and helix propensity in the binding of the KIX domain of CREB-binding protein by constitutive (c-Myb) and inducible (CREB) activators. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:42241-48.
33. Selenko P, Gregorovic G, Sprangers R et al. Structural basis for the molecular recognition between human splicing factors U2AF65 and SF1/mBBP. Mol Cell 2003; 11:965-76.
34. Liu Y, Matthews KS, Bondos SE. Multiple intrinsically disordered sequences alter DNA binding by the homeodomain ofthe Drosophila hox protein ultrabithorax. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:20874-87.
35. Phylip LH, Lees WE, Brownsey BG et al. The potency and specificity of the interaction between the IA3 inhibitor andits target aspartic proteinase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:2023-30.
36. Yu H, Chen JK, Feng S et al. Structural basis for the binding of proline-rich peptides to SH3 domains. Cell 1994; 76:933-45.
37. Billeter M, Qian YQ, Otting G et al. Determination of the nuclear magnetic resonance solution structure of an Antennapedia homeodomain-DNA complex. J Mol Biol 1993; 234:1084-93.
38. Simon SM, Sousa FJ, Mohana-Borges R et al. Regulation ofEscherichia coli SOS mutagenesis by dimeric intrinsically disordered umuD gene products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:1152-57.
39. Sigalov A, Aivazian D, Stern L. Homooligomerization of the cytoplasmic domain of the T cell receptor zeta chain and of other proteins containing the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif. Biochemistry 2004; 43:2049-61.
40. Savvides SN, Raghunathan S, Futterer K et al. The C-terminal domain of full-length E. coli SSB is disordered even when bound to DNA. Protein Sci 2004; 13:1942-47.
41. Hope IA, Mahadevan S, Struhl K. Structural and functional characterization of the short acidic transcriptional activation region of yeast GCN4 protein. Nature 1988; 333:635-40.
42. Sigler PB. Transcriptional activation. Acid blobs and negative noodles. Nature 1988; 333:210-12.
43. Ng KP, Potikyan G, Savene RO et al. Multiple aromatic side chains within a disordered structure are critical for transcription and transforming activity of EWS family oncoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:479-84.
44. Hansen JC, Lu X, Ross ED et al. Intrinsic protein disorder, amino acid composition, and histone terminal domains. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:1853-56.
45. Lu X, Hamkalo B, Parseghian MH et al. Chromatin condensing functions of the linker histone C-terminal domain are mediated by specific amino acid composition and intrinsic protein disorder. Biochemistry 2009; 48:164-72.
46. McBryant SJ, Klonoski J, Sorensen TC et al. Determinants of histone H4 N-terminal domain function during nucleosomal array oligomerization: roles of amino acid sequence, domain length, and charge density. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:16716-22.
47. Krishnan R, Lindquist SL. Structural insights into a yeast prion illuminate nucleation and strain diversity. Nature 2005; 435:765-72.
48. Ross ED, Edskes HK, Terry MJ et al. Primary sequence independence for prion formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:12825-30.
49. Mittag T, Orlicky S, Choy WY et al. Dynamic equilibrium engagement of a polyvalent ligand with a single-site receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:17772-77.
50. Iakoucheva LM, Radivojac P, Brown CJ et al. The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1037-49.
51. Borg M, Mittag T, Pawson T et al. Polyelectrostatic interactions of disordered ligands suggest a physical basis for ultrasensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:9650-55.
52. Baker JM, Hudson RP, Kanelis V et al. CFTR regulatory region interacts with NBD1 predominantly via multiple transient helices. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007; 14:738-45.
53. Lacy ER, Filippov I, Lewis WS et al. p27 binds cyclin-CDK complexes through a sequential mechanism involving binding-induced protein folding. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2004; 11:358-64.
54. Galea CA, Nourse A, Wang Y et al. Role of intrinsic flexibility in signal transduction mediated by the cell cycle regulator, p27 Kip1. J Mol Biol 2008; 376:827-38.
55. Polverini E, Rangaraj G, Libich DS et al. Binding of the proline-rich segment ofmyelin basic protein to SH3 domains: spectroscopic, microarray, and modeling studies of ligand conformation and effects of posttranslational modifcations. Biochemistry 2008; 47:267-82.
56. Ahmed MA, Bamm VV, Shi L et al. Induced secondary structure and polymorphism in an intrinsically disordered structural linker of the CNS: solid-state NMR and FTIR spectroscopy of myelin basic protein bound to actin. Biophys J 2009; 96:180-91.
57. Damante G, Pellizzari L, Esposito G et al. A molecular code dictates sequence-specifc DNA recognition by homeodomains. EMBO J 1996; 15:4992-5000.
58. Toth-Petroczy A, Simon I, Fuxreiter M et al. Disordered tails ofhomeodomains facilitate DNA recognition by providing a trade-off between folding and specific binding. J Am Chem Soc 2009; 131:15084-85.
59. Clerici M, Mourao A, Gutsche I et al. Unusual bipartite mode of interaction between the nonsense-mediated decay factors, UPF1 and UPF2. EMBO J 2009; 28:2293-306.
60. Corden JL. Tails of RNA polymerase II. Trends Biochem Sci 1990; 15:383-87.
61. Proudfoot NJ, Furger A, Dye MJ. Integrating mRNA processing with transcription. Cell 2002; 108:501-12.
62. Ha NC, Tonozuka T, Stamos JL et al. Mechanism of phosphorylation- dependent binding of APC to beta-catenin and its role in beta-catenin degradation. Mol Cell 2004; 15:511-21.
63. Luger K, Mader AW, Richmond RK etal. J.Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at2.8 A resolution. Nature 1997; 389:251-60.
64. Jenuwein T, Allis CD. Translating the histone code. Science 2001; 293:1074-1080.
65. Reeves R. Molecular biology ofHMGA proteins: hubs of nuclear function. Gene 2001; 277:63-81.
66. Taatjes DJ, Marr MT, Tjian R. Regulatory diversity among metazoan co-activator complexes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004; 5:403-10.
67. Chung WH, Craighead JL, Chang WH et al. RNA polymerase II/TFIIF structure and conserved organization of the initiation complex. Mol Cell 2003; 12:1003-13.
68. Bubunenko MG, Chuikov SV, Gudkov AT. The length of the interdomain region of the L7/L12 protein is important for its function. FEBS Lett 1992; 313:232-34.
69. Galea CA, Wang Y, Sivakolundu SG et al. Regulation of cell division by intrinsically unstructured proteins: intrinsic flexibility, modularity, and signaling conduits. Biochemistry 2008; 47:7598-609.
70. Bernard C, Gely S, Bourhis JM et al. Interaction between the C-terminal domains of N and P proteins of measles virus investigated by NMR. FEBS Lett 2009; 583:1084-89.
71. Bourhis JM, Canard B, Longhi S. Structural disorder within the replicative complex of measles virus: functional implications. Virology 2006; 344:94-110.
72. Shi W, Huang Y, Sutton-Smith M et al. A flovirus-unique region of Ebola virus nucleoprotein confers aberrant migration and mediates its incorporation into virions. J Virol 2008; 82:6190-99.
73. Chiti F, Dobson CM. Protein misfolding, functional amyloid, and human disease. Annu Rev Biochem 2006; 75:333-66.
74. Chen M, Margittai M, Chen J et al. Investigation of alpha-synuclein fibril structure by site-directed spin labeling. J Biol Chem 2007; 282(34):24970-79.
75. Margittai M, Langen R. Fibrils with parallel in-register structure constitute a major class of amyloid fibrils: molecular insights from electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. Q Rev Biophys 2008; 41:265-97.
76. Tompa P. Structural disorder in amyloid fibrils: its implication in dynamic interactions of proteins. FEBS J 2009; 276:5406-15.
77. Cliff MJ, Harris R, Barford D et al. Conformational diversity in the TPR domain-mediated interaction of protein phosphatase 5 with Hsp90. Structure 2006; 14:415-26.
78. Hurley TD, Yang J, Zhang L et al. Structural basis for regulation of protein phosphatase 1 by inhibitor-2. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:28874-83.
79. Kover KE, Bruix M, Santoro J et al. The solution structure and dynamics of human pancreatic ribonuclease determined by NMR spectroscopy provide insight into its remarkable biological activities and inhibition. J Mol Biol 2008; 379:953-65.
80. von Ossowski I, Eaton JT, Czjzek M et al. Protein disorder: conformational distribution of the flexible linker in a chimeric double cellulase. Biophys J 2005; 88:2823-32.
81. Lindner RA, Carver JA, Ehrnsperger M et al. Mouse Hsp25, a small shock protein. The role ofits C-terminal extension in oligomerization and chaperone action. Eur J Biochem 2000; 267:1923-32.
82. Schwarz-Linek U, Pilka ES, Pickford AR et al. High afinity streptococcal binding to human ibronectin requires specific recognition of sequential F1 modules. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:39017-25.
83. Gill G, Pascal E, Tseng ZH et al. A glutamine-rich hydrophobic patch in transcription factor Sp1 contacts the dTAFII110 component of the Drosophila TFIID complex and mediates transcriptional activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91(1):192-96.
84. Lee GM, Pufall MA, Meeker CA et al. The affinity of Ets-1 for DNA is modulated by phosphorylation through transient interactions of an unstructured region. J Mol Biol 2008; 382:1014-30.
85. Pometun MS, Chekmenev EY, Wittebort RJ. Quantitative observation of backbone disorder in native elastin. J Biol Chem 2004; 279(9):7982-87.
86. Ross ED, Baxa U, Wickner RB. Scrambled prion domains form prions and amyloid. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24(16):7206-13.