Disentangling the effects of mating propensity and mating choice in Drosophila

Evolution

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 126-133

  Casares, Pelayo ^a   Carracedo, Maria C ^a   Del Rio, Beatriz ^a   Piñeiro, Rafael ^a   Garcia Florez, Lucia ^a   Barros, Ana R ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE OVIEDO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Drosophila; Mating choice tests; Mating propensity; Sexual isolation

Indexed keywords

MATE CHOICE; MATING BEHAVIOUR; SEXUAL ISOLATION;

DIPTERA; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; DROSOPHILA SIMULANS; DROSOPHILIDAE; MELANOGASTER;

EID: 0031902833     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb05145.x     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. ANDERSON, W. W., AND L. ERHMAN. 1969. Mating choice in crosses between geographic populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Am. Midl. Nat. 81:47-53.
2. ASLUND, S. E., AND M. RASMUSON. 1976. Mating behaviour as a fitness component in maintaining allozyme polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. Hereditas 82:175-178.
3. BURNET, B., AND K. J. CONNOLLY. 1981. Gene action and the analysis of behaviour. Br. Med. Bull. 37:107-113.
4. CARRACEDO, M. C., P. CASARES, J. I. IZQUIERDO, AND R. PIÑEIRO. 1991. Receptivity and sexual maturation of Drosophila melanogaster females in relation to hybridization with D. simulans males: a populational analysis. Anim. Behav. 42:201-208.
5. CASARES, P., M. C. CARRACEDO, R. PIÑEIRO, E. SAN MIGUEL, AND L. GARCÍA-FLÓREZ. 1992. Genetic basis for female receptivity in Drosophila melanogaster: a diallel study. Heredity 69:400-411.
6. CASARES, P., M. C. CARRACEDO, E. SAN MIGUEL, R. PIÑEIRO, AND L. GARCÍA-FLÓREZ. 1993. Male mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster: differences in genetic architecture and in relative performance according to female genotype. Behav. Genet. 23:349-358.
7. COBB, M., K. CONNOLLY, AND B. BURNET. 1985. Courtship behaviour in the melanogaster species sub-group of Drosophila. Behaviour 95:203-231.
8. COBB, M., B. BURNET, AND K. CONNOLLY. 1986. The structure of courtship in the Drosophila melanogaster species sub-group. Behaviour 97:182-212.
9. DOW, M. A. 1976. Analysis of truncated distributions: mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 6:385-389.
10. _. 1977. Selection for mating success of yellow mutant Drosophila melanogaster: biometrical genetic analysis Heredity 38:161-168.
11. ELENS, A., J. VAN DEN HAUTE, AND J. DELCOUR. 1973. Sexual vigor and sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 27:549-557.
12. EHRMAN, L., AND P. A. PARSONS. 1980. Sexual isolation among widely distributed populations of Drosophila immigrans. Behav. Genet. 10:401-407.
13. GILBERT, D. G., AND W. T. STARMER. 1985. Statistics of sexual isolation. Evolution 39:1380-1383.
14. KESSLER, S. 1969. The genetics of Drosophila mating behavior. II. The genetic architecture of mating speed in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 62:421-433.
15. KILIAS, G., S. N. ALAHIOTIS, AND M. PELECANOS. 1983. A multifactorial genetic investigation of speciation theory using Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 34:730-737.
16. KIM, Y.-K., R. KOEPFER, AND L. EHRMAN. 1996. Developmental isolation and subsequent adult behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. III. Alternative rearing. Behav. Genet. 26:27-37.
17. KOEPFER, H. R. 1987. Selection for sexual isolation between geographic forms of Drosophila mojavensis. I. Interactions between the selected forms. Evolution 41:37-48.
18. LAMBERT, D. M., AND N. R. HENDERSON. 1986. A multifactorial genetic investigation of speciation theory using Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 16:369-373.
19. LORETO, E. L. S., AND A. K. OLIVEIRA. 1988. Selection of Drosophila melanogaster for extreme developmental rates. II. Sexual and reproductive isolation due to hybrid inferiority. Rev. Brasil Genet. 11:267-274.
20. MANNING, A. 1961. The effects of artificial selection for mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 9:82-92.
21. _. 1967. The control of sexual receptivity in female Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 15:239-250.
22. MANNING, A., AND J. HIRSCH. 1971. The effects of artificial selection for slow mating in Drosophila simulans. II. Genetic analysis of the slow mating line. Anim. Behav. 19:448-453.
23. MARKOW, T. A. 1981. Mating preferences are not predictive of the direction of evolution in experimental populations of Drosophila. Science 213:1405-1407.
24. PARSONS, P. A. 1973. Behavioural and ecological genetics. A study in Drosophila. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.
25. PIÑEIRO, R., M. C. CARRACEDO, J. I. IZQUIERDO, AND P. CASARES. 1993. Bidirectional selection for female receptivity in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 23:77-83.
26. SANTIBAÑEZ, S. K., AND C. H. WADDINGTON. 1958. The origin of sexual isolation between different lines within a species. Evolution 12:485-493.
27. SINGH, B. N., AND S. CHATTERJEE. 1988. Selection for high and low mating propensity in Drosophila ananassae. Behav. Genet. 18:357-369.
28. SNEDECOR, G. W., AND W. G. COCHRAN. 1967. Statistical methods. 6th ed. Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA.
29. SOKAL, R. R., AND F. J. ROLFH. 1981. Biometry. 2d ed. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
30. SPIESS, E. B. 1970. Mating propensity and its genetic basis in Drosophila. Pp. 315-379 in M. K. Hecht and W. C. Steere, eds. Essays in evolution and genetics in honor of Theodosius Dobzhansky. Appleton Century Crofts, New York.
31. SPIETH, H. T., AND J. M. RINGO. 1983. Mating behavior and sexual isolation in Drosophila. Pp. 223-284 in M. Ashburner, H. L. Carson, and J. N. Thompson Jr., eds. The genetics and biology of Drosophila, Vol. 3C. Academic Press, New York.
32. STURTEVANT, A. H. 1915. Experiments on sex recognition and the problem of sexual selection in Drosophila. J. Anim. Behav. 5:351-366.
33. WATTIAUX, J. M. 1964. Mesure de l'isolement sexuel. Z. Vererbungsl. 95:10-16.
34. WATTIAUX, J. M., AND A. ELENS. 1970. Variation in the sexual behaviour of Drosophila. Dros. Inf. Serv. 45:97.