Species hybrids in the laboratory but not in nature: A reanalysis of premating isolation between drosophila arizonae and D. mojavensis

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 587-598

  Jennings, Jackson H ^a,b   Etges, William J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Experimental design; Mate choice; Sexual isolation; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ALLOPATRY; CACTUS; FLY; HOST PLANT; HYBRID; HYBRIDIZATION; LABORATORY METHOD; MATE CHOICE; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SIBLING; SYMPATRY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA; HYBRIDIZATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

CACTACEAE; DROSOPHILA ARIZONAE; DROSOPHILA MOJAVENSIS;

EID: 75149115207     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00834.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Baker, W. K. 1947. A study of the isolation mechanisms found in Drosophila arizonensis and Drosophila mojavensis. Univ. Texas Publ. 4752 : 126 136.
2. Beltman, J. B., and J. A. J. Metz. 2005. Speciation: more likely through a genetic or through a learned habitat preference? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 272 : 1455 1463.
3. Brazner, J. C. 1983. The influence of rearing environment on sexual isolation between populations of Drosophila mojavensis: an alternative to the character displacement hypothesis. MS Thesis. Syracuse Univ., Syracuse, NY.
4. Brazner, J. C., and W. J. Etges. 1993. Pre-mating isolation is determined by rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. II. Effects of larval substrates on time to copulation, mate choice, and mating propensity. Evol. Ecol. 7 : 605 624.
5. Carvajal-Rodriguez, A., and E. Rolan-Alvarez. 2006. JMATING: a software for the analysis of sexual selection and sexual isolation effects from mating frequency data. BMC Evol. Biol. 6 : 40.
6. Counterman, B. A., and M. A. F. Noor. 2006. Multilocus test for introgression between cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis and D. arizonae. Am. Nat. 168 : 682 696.
7. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, MA.
8. Coyne, J. A., S. Elwyn, and E. Rolán-Alvarez. 2005. Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies: direct effects and comparison to field hybridization data. Evolution 59 : 2588 2601.
9. Cracraft, J. 1992. Speciation concepts and speciation analysis. Pp. 93 120 in M. Ereshefsky, ed. The units of evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. Dobzhansky, T. 1935. A critique of the species concept in biology. Philos. Sci. 2 : 344 345.
11. Dukas, R. 2008. Learning decreased heterospecific courtship and mating in fruit flies. Biol. Lett. R. Soc. B. 272 : 1455 1463.
12. Etges, W. J. 1992. Premating isolation is determined by larval substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. Evolution 46 : 1945 1950.
13. Etges, W. J. 1998. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. IV. Correlated responses in behavioral isolation to artificial selection on a life history trait. Am. Nat. 152 : 129 144.
14. Etges, W. J., and M. A. Ahrens. 2001. Premating isolation is determined by larval-rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. V. Deep geographic variation in epicuticular hydrocarbons among isolated populations. Am. Nat. 158 : 585 598.
15. Etges, W. J., and A. D. Tripodi. 2008. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. VIII. Mating success mediated by epicuticular hydrocarbons within and between isolated populations. J. Evol. Biol. 21 : 1641 1652.
16. Etges, W. J., W. R. Johnson, G. A. Duncan, G. Huckins, and W. B. Heed. 1999. Ecological genetics of cactophilic Drosophila. Pp. 164 214 in R. Robichaux, ed. Ecology of Sonoran desert plants and plant communities. Univ. of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.
17. Etges, W. J., C. C. D. Oliveira, M. G. Ritchie, and M. A. F. Noor. 2009. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. II. Host plants and mating status influence cuticular hydrocarbon QTL expression and G × E interactions. Evolution 63 : 1712 1730.
18. Fellows, D. P., and W. B. Heed. 1972. Factors affecting host plant selection in desert-adapted cactiphilic Drosophila. Ecology 53 : 850 858.
19. Fogleman, J. C., and W. T. Starmer. 1985. Analysis of community structure of yeasts associated with decaying stems of cactus. III. Stenocereus thurberi. Microb. Ecol. 11 : 165 173.
20. Gilbert, D. G., and W. T. Starmer. 1985. Statistics of sexual isolation. Evolution 39 : 1380 1383.
21. Heed, W. B. 1978. Ecology and genetics of Sonoran Desert Drosophila. Pp. 109 126 in P. F. Brussard, ed. Proceedings in the life sciences, ecological genetics: the interface. Springer, New York.
22. Heed, W. B., and R. L. Mangan. 1986. Community ecology of the Sonoran Desert Drosophila. Pp. 311 345 in M. Ashburner, H. L. Carson and J. N. Thompson. eds. The genetics and biology of Drosophila. Academic Press, New York.
23. Hoikkala, A., and J. Aspi. 1993. Criteria of female mate choice in Drosophila littoralis, D. montana and D. ezoana. Evolution 47 : 768 777.
24. Krebs, R. A., and K. L. Bean. 1991. The mating behavior of Drosophila mojavensis on organ pipe and agria cactus. Psyche 98 : 101 109.
25. Lachlan, R. F., and M. R. Servedio. 2004. Song learning accelerates allopatric speciation. Evolution 58 : 2049 2063.
26. LeMoli, F., and M. Mainardi. 1972. Effect of recent experiences with reproductive isolation between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Instituto Lombardo. Rend. Sci. B 106 : 29 35.
27. Liimatainen, J. O., and A. Hoikkala. 1998. Interactions of the males and females of three sympatric Drosophila virilis-group species, D. montana, D. littoralis, and D lummei, (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in intra- and interspecific courtships in the wild and in the laboratory. J. Insect Behav. 11 : 399 417.
28. Machado, C. A., L. M. Matzkin, L. K. Reed, and T. A. Markow. 2007. Multilocus nuclear sequences reveal intra- and interspecific relationships among chromosomally polymorphic species of cactophilic Drosophila. Mol. Ecol. 16 : 3009 3024.
29. Malagolowkin-Cohen, C., A. S. Simmons, and H. Levene. 1965. A study of sexual isolation between certain strains of Drosophila paulistorum. Evolution 19 : 95 103.
30. Markow, T. A. 1981. Courtship behavior and control of reproductive isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonensis. Evolution 35 : 1022 1027.
31. Markow, T. A., and G. D. Hocutt. 1998. Reproductive isolation in Sonoran Desert Drosophila: testing the limits of the rules. Pp. 234 244 in D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
32. Markow, T. A., J. C. Fogleman, and W. B. Heed. 1983. Reproductive isolation in Sonoran Desert Drosophila. Evolution 37 : 649 652.
33. Massie, K. R., and T. A. Markow. 2005. Sympatry, allopatry and sexual isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and D. arizonae. Hereditas 142 : 51 55.
34. Matzkin, L. M., and W. F. Eanes. 2003. Sequence variation of alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) paralogs in cactophilic Drosophila. Genetics 163 : 181 194.
35. Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
36. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
37. Mayr, E., and T. Dobzhansky. 1945. Experiments on sexual isolation in Drosophila. IV. Modification of the degree of isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis and of sexual preferences in Drosophila prosaltans. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 31 : 75 82.
38. Mettler, L. E. 1957. Studies on experimental populations of Drosophila arizonensis and Drosophila mojavensis. Univ. Tex. Publ. 5721 : 157 181.
39. Mettler, L. E., and J. J. Nagle. 1966. Corroboratory evidence for the concept of the sympatric origin of isolating mechanisms. Dros. Inf. Serv. 41 : 76.
40. Nagle, J. J. 1965. Studies on experimental sympatry between two sibling species. Dros. Inf. Serv. 40 : 82 83.
41. Nagle, J. J., and L. E. Mettler. 1969. Relative fitness of introgressed and parental populations of Drosophila mojavensis and D. arizonensis. Evolution 23 : 519 524.
42. Noor, M. A. F., and D. Ortiz-Barrientos. 2006. Simulating natural conditions in the laboratory: a re-examination of sexual isolation between sympatric and allopatric populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Behav. Genet. 36 : 322 327.
43. O'Hara, E., A. Pruzan, and L. Ehrman. 1976. Ethological isolation and mating experience in Drosophila paulistorum. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 73 : 975 976.
44. Park, L. K. 1989. Evolution in the repleta group of Drosophila: a phylogenetic analysis using mitochondrial DNA. Ph.D. Dissertation. Washington Univ., St. Louis, MO.
45. Patterson, J. T. 1947. Sexual isolation in the mulleri subgroup. Univ. Texas Publ. 4752 : 32 40.
46. Pitnick, S., T. A. Markow, and G. S. Spicer. 1995. Delayed male maturity is a cost of producing large sperm in Drosophila. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 92 : 10614 10618.
47. Reed, L. K., and T. A. Markow. 2004. Early events in speciation: polymorphism for hybrid male sterility in Drosophila mojavensis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 101 : 9009 9012.
48. Reed, L. K., M. Nyboer, and T. A. Markow. 2007. Evolutionary relationships of Drosophila mojavensis geographic host races and their sister species Drosophila arizonae. Mol. Ecol. 16 : 1007 1022.
49. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43 : 223 225.
50. Rolán-Alvarez, E., and A. Caballero 2000. Estimating sexual selection and sexual isolation effects from mating frequencies. Evolution 54 : 30 36.
51. Ruiz, A., and W. B. Heed. 1988. Host-plant specificity in the cactophilic Drosophila mulleri species complex. J. Anim. Ecol. 57 : 237 249.
52. Ruiz, A., W. B. Heed, and M. Wasserman. 1990. Evolution of the mojavensis cluster of cactophilic Drosophila with descriptions of two new species. J. Hered. 81 : 30 42.
53. SAS Institute. 2004. SAS/STAT. 9.1.2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
54. Spieth, H. T. 1958. Behavior and isolating mechanisms. Pp. 363 389 in A. Roe and G. C. Simpson, eds. Behavior and evolution. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT.
55. Spieth, H. T., and J. M. Ringo. 1983. Mating behavior and sexual isolation in Drosophila. Pp. 224 284 in M. Ashburner, H. L. Carson and J. N. Thompson, eds. The genetics and biology of Drosophila. Vol. 3c. Academic Press, London.
56. Stalker, H. D. 1942. Sexual isolation studies in the species complex Drosophila virilis. Genetics 27 : 238 257.
57. Starmer, W. T. 1982. Analysis of community structure of yeasts associated with decaying stems of cactus. I. Stenocereus gummosus. Microb. Ecol. 8 : 71 81.
58. Stennett, M. D., and W. J. Etges. 1997. Premating isolation is determined by larval substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. III. Epicuticular hydrocarbon variation is determined by use of different host plants in Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonae. J. Chem. Ecol. 23 : 2803 2824.
59. Verzijden, M. N., R. F. Lachlan, and M. R. Servedio. 2005. Female mate-choice behavior and sympatric speciation. Evolution 59 : 2097 2108.
60. Wasserman, M., and H. R. Koepfer. 1977. Character displacement for sexual isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonensis. Evolution 31 : 812 823.
61. Wu, C., H. Hollocher, D. J. Begun, C. F. Aquadro, Y. Xu, and M. Wu. 1995. Sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: a possible case of incipient speciation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 92 : 2519 2523.
62. Zouros, E. 1973. Genic differentiation associated with the early stages of speciation in the mulleri subgroup of Drosophila. Evolution 27 : 601 621.
63. Zouros, E., and C. J. D'Entremont. 1980. Sexual isolation among populations of Drosophila mojavensis: response to pressure from a related species. Evolution 34 : 421 430.