A critical agency network model for building an integrated outreach program

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 276-303

  Kiyama, Judy Marquez ^a   Lee, Jenny J ^b   Rhoades, Gary ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^c American Association of University Professors   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859175280     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: 15384640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/jhe.2012.0009     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Alexander-Snow, M., & Johnson, B. (1998, Nov.). Faculty of color and role performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Miami, FL.
2. Antonio, A. (2002). Faculty of color reconsidered: Reassessing contributions to scholarship. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 582-602.
3. Antonio, A., Astin, H., & Cress, C. (2000). Community service in higher education: A look at the nation's faculty. Review of Higher Education, 23(4), 373-398.
4. Astin, A. W., & Oseguera, L. (2004). The declining "equity" of American higher education. Review of Higher Education, 27(3), 299-320.
5. Astin, H. S., & Leland, C. (1991). Women of influence, women of vision: A cross-generational study of leaders and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Auerbach, S. (2004). Engaging Latino parents in supporting college pathways: Lessons from a college access program. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 3(2), 125-145.
7. Baez, B. (2000). Race-related service and faculty of color: Conceptualizing critical agency in academe. Higher Education, 39(3), 363-391.
8. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
9. Benjamin, R., & Carroll, S. (1998). The implications of the changed environment for governance in higher education. In W. Tierney (Ed.), The responsive university: Restructuring for high performance (pp. 92-119). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10. Berry, T. (2008). The role of social capital in human capital investment: A social network approach to college success in the first year. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
11. Blackburn, R. T., & Lawrence, J. H. (1995). Faculty at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
13. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1989). The condition of the professoriate: Attitudes and trends, 1989: A technical report. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. Checkoway, B. (2001). Renewing the civic mission of the American research university. The Journal of Higher Education, 72, 126-147.
15. Choo, C. W., & Bontis, N. (Eds.). (2002). The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Clark, B. R. (1987). Academic life: Small worlds, different worlds. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
17. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: IAU Press and Pergamon Press.
18. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
20. Deil-Amen, R., & Rios-Aguilar, C. (2010). Beyond getting in and fitting in: Leveraging a trajectory of educational success through professionally-relevant social networks. Unpublished manuscript.
21. Del Faver, M. (2005). The social dimension of academic discipline as a discriminator of academic deans' administrative behaviors. Review of Higher Education, 29(1), 69-96.
22. Edwards, R. (1999, Sept.) The academic department: How does it fit into the university reform agenda? Change, 31(5), 17.
23. Fairweather, J. S. (1996). Faculty work and public trust: Restoring the value of teaching and public service in American academic life. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
24. Fairweather, J. S. (2002). The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional policy and decision making. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 26-48.
25. Finkelstein, M. J. (1984). The American academic profession. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
26. Fisher, J. L. (1984). Power of the presidency. New York: Macmillan
27. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 360-380.
28. Gumport, P. J. (2000). Academic restructuring: Organizational change and institutional imperatives. Higher Education, 39(1), 67-91.
29. Hart, J. (2006). Faculty change initiatives: Responding to a campus climate study. In S. Bracken, J. K. Allen, & D. R. Dean (Eds.), The balancing act: Gendered perspectives in faculty roles and work lives (pp. 121-146). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
30. Hart. J. (2007). Creating networks as an activist strategy: Differing approaches among academic feminist organizations. Journal of the Professoriate, 2(1), 33-52.
31. Hart, J. (2008). Mobilization among women academics: The interplay between feminism and professionalization. NWSA Journal, 20(1), 184-208.
32. Holland, B. (1999). Factors and strategies that influence faculty involvement in public service. Journal of Public Service & Outreach, 4(1), 37-44.
33. Jansen, J. D. (2002). Mode 2 knowledge and institutional life: Taking Gibbons on a walk through a South African university. Higher Education, 43(4), 507-21.
34. Johnsrud, L. K., & Des Jarlais, C. D. (1994). Barriers to tenure for women and minorities. Review of Higher Education, 17(4), 335-53.
35. Keller, G. (1983). Academic strategy: The management revolution in higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
36. Kerr, C., & Gade, M. L. (1986). The many lives of academic presidents: Time, place and character. Washington, DC: Association of Governing Boards.
37. Kezar, A. (2001). Organizational models and facilitators of change: Providing a framework for student and academic affairs collaborations. In A. Kezar, D. J. Hirsch, & C. Burack (Eds.), Understanding the role of academic and student affairs collaboration in creating a successful learning environment (New Directions for Higher Education, No. 116, pp. 63-74). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38. Kezar, A. (2005). Consequences of radical change in governance: A grounded theory approach. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 634-668.
39. Kezar, A. (2006). Redesigning for collaboration in learning initiatives: An examination of four highly collaborative campuses. The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 804-838.
40. Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. D. (2004). Meeting today's governance challenge: A synthesis of the literature and examination of a future agenda for scholarship. The Journal of Higher Education, 75, 371-399.
41. Kezar, A., & Lester, J. (2009). Promoting grassroots change in higher education: The promise of virtual networks. Change, 41(2), 44-51.
42. Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social network analysis (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
43. Kuh, G. D. (1996). Guiding principles for creating seamless learning environments for undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development, 37(2), 135-148.
44. Lee, J. J. (2004). Comparing institutional relationships with academic departments: A study of five academic fields. Research in Higher Education, 45(7), 603-624.
45. Lee, J. J. (2007). The shaping of the departmental culture: Measuring the relative influences of the institution and discipline. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(1), 41-55.
46. Leslie, D. W., & Fretwell, E. K., Jr. (1996). Wise moves in hard times: Creating and managing resilient colleges and universities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47. Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28-51.
48. Lindholm, J., Astin, A., Sax, L., & Korn, W. (2002). The American college teacher: National norms for the 2001-2002 HERI Faculty Survey. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute.
49. Love, P. G., Kuh, G. D., MacKay, K. A., & Hardy, C. M. (1993). Side by side: Faculty and student affairs cultures. In G. D. Kuh (Ed.), Cultural perspectives in student affairs work (pp. 37-58). Lanham, MD: American College Personnel Association.
50. Martinek, T., Hellison, D., & Walsh, D. (2004). Service-bonded inquiry revisited: A research model for the community-engaged professor. Quest, 56, 397-412.
51. Matthews, A. (1997). Bright college years: Inside the American campus today. New York: Simon and Schuster.
52. Milem, J., Berger, J., & Dey, E. (2000). Faculty time allocation: A study of change over twenty years. The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 454-475.
53. Mohrman, S., Cohen, S., & Mohrman, A. (1995). Designing team based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
54. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
55. Oakes, J., Rogers, J., Lipton, M., & Morrell, E. (2002). The social construction of college access. In W. G. Tierney & L. S. Hagedorn (Eds.), Increasing access to college: Extending possibilities for all students (pp. 81-104). Albany: State University of New York Press.
56. Philpott, J. L., & Strange, C. (2003). On the road to Cambridge: A case study of faculty and student affairs in collaboration. The Journal of Higher Education, 74, 77-95.
57. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116-141.
58. Pusser, B., Slaughter, S., & Thomas, S. (2006). Playing the board game: An empirical analysis of university trustee and corporate board interlocks. The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 747-775.
59. Rendón, L. I., Novack, V., & Dowell, D. (2005). Testing race-neutral admissions models: Lessons from California State University-Long Beach. Review of Higher Education, 28(2), 221-244.
60. Rhoades, G. (1998). Reviewing and rethinking administrative costs. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 13, pp. 111-47). New York: Agathon Press.
61. Rhoades, G. (2000). Who's doing it right?: Strategic activity in public research universities. Review of Higher Education, 24(1), 41-66.
62. Rhoades, G. (2006). The higher education we choose: A question of balance. The Review of Higher Education, 29(3), 381-404.
63. Rhoades, G., & Sporn, B. (2002). New models of management and shifting modes and costs of production: Europe and the United States. Tertiary Education and Management, 8, 3-28.
64. Rosser, V., Johnsrud, L., & Heck, R. H. (2003). Academic deans and directors: Assessing their effectiveness from individual and institutional perspectives. The Journal of Higher Education, 74, 1-25.
65. Stake, R. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
66. Stanley, C. A. (2006). Coloring the academic landscape: Faculty of color breaking the silence in predominantly white colleges and universities. American Educational Research Journal, 43(4), 701-736.
67. Thomas, S. (2000). Ties that bind: A social network approach to understanding student integration and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 591-615.
68. Tierney, W. G., & Bensimon, E. M. (1996). Promotion and tenure: Community and socialization in academe. Albany: State University of New York Press.
69. Tierney, W. G., & Jun, A. (2001). A university helps prepare low-income youths for college. Tracking school success. The Journal of Higher Education, 72, 205-225.
70. Torres, C., & Márquez, A. (2005). Reaching higher ground: Parental outreach programs at the postsecondary level. Los Angeles: Tomás Rivera Policy Institute.
71. Walvoord, B. E., Carey, A. K., Smith, H. L., Soled, S. W., Way, P. K, & Zorn, D. (2000). Academic departments: How they work, how they change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
72. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
73. Weerts, D. J., & Sandmann, L. R. (2008). Building a two-way street: Challenges and opportunities for community engagement at research universities. Review of Higher Education, 32(1), 73-106.
74. Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1-19.
75. Whitt, E. J., Nesheim, B. E., Guentzel, M. J., Kellogg, A. H., McDonald, W. M., & Wells, C. A. (2008). Principles of good practice for academic and student affairs partnership programs. Journal of College Student Development, 49(3), 235-249.
76. Wolverton, M., Gmelch, W. H., Wolverton, M. L., & Nies, C. T. (2001). The changing nature of the academic deanship. ASHE/ERIC Higher Education Report, 28(1), 95-108.
77. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
78. Ylijoki, O.-H. (2003). Entangled in academic capitalism? A case study on changing ideals and practices of university research. Higher Education, 45(3), 307-35.