Meeting today's governance challenges: A synthesis of the literature and examination of a future agenda for scholarship

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 75, Issue 4, 2004, Pages

  Kezar, Adrianna ^a   Eckel, Peter D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b American Council on Education   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3242716865     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2004.11772264     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Altbach, P., Gumport, P., & Johnstone, B. (2001). In defense of American higher education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
2. Argyris, C. (1994). On organizational learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
3. Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges. (1996). Renewing the academic presidency: Stronger leadership for tougher times. Washington DC: Association of Governing Boards.
4. Baldridge, J. (1971). Power and conflict in the university. New York: John Wiley.
5. Baldridge, J. (1982). Shared governance: A fable about the lost magic kingdom. Academe, January-February, 12-15.
6. Baldwin, R., & Leslie, D. (2001). Rethinking the structure of shared governance. Peer Review, 3(3), 18-19.
7. Benjamin, R., & Carroll, S. (1998). The implications of the changes environment for governance in higher education. In W. Tierney (Ed.), The responsive university (pp. 92-119). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
8. Berdahl, R. O. (1991). Shared academic governance and external constraints. In M. W. Peterson, E. E. Chaffed, & T. H. White (Eds.), Organization and academic governance in higher education (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA.: Ginned Press.
9. Birnbaum, R. (1988). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Birnbaum, R. (1989). The cybernetic institution: Toward an integration of governance theories. Higher Education, 18, 239-253.
11. Birnbaum, R. (1991). The latent organizational functions of the academic senate: Why senates do not work but will not go away. In M. W. Peterson, E. E. Chaffed, & T. H. White (Eds.), Organization and academic governance in higher education (4th ed., pp. 195-207). Needham Heights, MA: Ginned Press.
12. Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1991). Rearming organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Carlisle, B., & Miller, M. (1998). Current trends and issues in the practice of faculty participation in academic governance. ED423758
14. Chait, R., Holland, T., & Taylor, B. (1996). Improving the performance of governing boards. Washington, DC: ACE/ORYX.
15. Clark, B. (1963). Faculty organization and authority. In T. Lansford (Ed.), The study of academic administration. Boulder, CO: WICHE.
16. Clark, B. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Tarrytown, NY: Pergamino.
17. Cohen M. D., & March, J. G. (1986). Leadership and ambiguity (2nd ed., 1974 original). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
18. Czarniawska, B., & Sevon, G. (1996). Translating Organizational Change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
19. Dill, D. D., & Helm, K. P. (1988). Faculty participation in policy making. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 4). New York: Agathon.
20. Dimond, J. (1991). Faculty participation in institutional budgeting. In R. Birnbaum (Ed.), Faculty in governance: The role of senates and joint committees in academic decision making (pp. 63-78), New Directions for Higher Education, No. 75. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
21. Drummond, M., & Reitsch, A. (1995). The relationship between shared academic governance models and faculty and administrator attitudes. Journal for Higher Education Management, 11, 1. EJ518196
22. Duryea, E. (1991). Evolution of university organization. In M. Peterson (Ed.), ASHE reader on organization and governance in higher education (pp. 3-15), Needham Heights, MA: Ginned Press.
23. Eckel, P., Hill, B., & Green, M. (1998). En route to transformation. On Change: Occasional Paper, No. 1. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
24. Eckel, P. (2003). Changing course: Making the hard decisions to eliminate academic programs. Westport CT: Greenwood/Praeger.
25. Eckel, P. D. (2000). The role of shared governance in institutional hard decisions: Enabler or antagonist? Review of Higher Education, 24, 15-39.
26. Fairweather, J. (1996). Faculty work and public trust: Restoring the value of teaching and public service in American academia. Des Moines, IA: Longwood. ED393363
27. Finkelstein, M., Seal, M., & Schuster, J. (1999). New entrants to the full-time faculty of higher education institutions. Education Statistics Quarterly, 1(4), 78-80.
28. Gilmour, J. (1991). Participative governance bodies in higher education: Report of a national study. In R. Birnbaum (Ed), Faculty in governance: The role of senates and joint committees in academic decision making (pp. 27-40), New Directions for Higher Education, No. 75. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
29. Goodman, P. (1962). The community of scholars. New York: Random House.
30. Gross, E., & Grambasch, P. (1974). Changes in university organization, 1964-1971. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31. Gumport, P. (2000). Academic governance: New light on old issues. Washington, DC: AGB Occasional Paper.
32. Gumport, P., & Dauberman, J. (1999). Managing for legitimacy: President's perspectives within public higher education. Paper presented at the Association for the Study of Higher Education annual conference, November 18-21.
33. Gumport, P., & Pusser, B. (1999). University restructuring: The role of economic and political contexts. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 14, pp. 146-200) New York: Agathon.
34. Hardy, C. (1990). Putting power into university academic governance. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research. (Vol. 6). New York: Agathon.
35. Keller, G. (1983). Shaping an academic strategy. In G. Keller (Ed.), Academic strategy: The management revolution in American higher education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
36. Kermerer, F., & Baldridge, J. V. (1981). Senates and unions: Unexpected peaceful coexistence. Journal of Higher Education, 52(3), 256-264.
37. Kerr, C. (1963). The uses of the university. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Kerr, C., & Gade, M. (1986). The many faces of the presidency. Washington, DC: Association for Governing Boards.
39. Kezar, A. (2000). ERIC trends. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education. www.eriche.org.
40. Kezar A., & El-Khawas, E. (in press). Using the performance dimension: Converging paths for external accountability? In H. Eggins (Ed.), Higher education reform. London: Society for Research into Higher Education.
41. Kissler, G. (1997). Who decides which budgets to cut? The Journal of Higher Education, 68, 427-459.
42. Lee, B. (1991). Campus leaders and campus senates. In R. Birnbaum (Ed.), Faculty in governance: The role of senates and joint committees in academic decision making (pp. 41-62). New Directions for Higher Education, No. 75. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
43. Leslie, D., & Fretwell, L. (1996). Wise moves in hard times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
44. March, J. G. (1981). Decision-making perspective. In A. H. Van de Ven & W. F. Joyce (Eds.), Perspectives on organization design and behavior (pp. 205-248). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
45. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1986). Organizations (2nd ed.). London: Blackwell Business.
46. Millett, J. (1962). The academic community. New York: McGraw-Hill.
47. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The professional bureaucracy. Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
48. Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49. Mortimer, K., & McConnell, T. (1979). Sharing authority effectively. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
50. Peterson, M., & White, T. (1992). Faculty and administrator perceptions of their environments: Different views of different models of organization. Research in Higher Education, 33(2), 177-204.
51. Pope, M., & Miller, T. (1999). A national profile of faculty governance leaders in higher education. ED 429490.
52. Reyes, P., & Smith, G. (1987). Faculty and academic staff participation in academic governance: The social contract model. Paper presented at the ASHE annual meeting in San Diego, Feb. 13-17.
53. Riley, G., & Baldridge, J. V. (Eds.). (1977). Governing academic organizations: new problems and perspectives. New York: McCutchan.
54. Rhoades, G. (1995). Rethinking and restructuring universities. Journal of Higher Education Management, 10(2) 17-23.
55. Schuster, J., & Miller, L. (1989). Governing tomorrow's campus: Perspectives and agendas. New York: American Council on Education/Macmillan.
56. Schuster, J., Smith, D., Corak, K., & Yamada, M. (1994). Strategic academic governance: How to make big decisions better. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx.
57. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. New York: Basic Books.
58. Stroup, H. (1966). Bureaucracy in higher education. New York: Free Press.
59. Sporn, B. (1999). Responsive university structures: An analysis of adaptation to socioeconomic environments of US and European universities. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
60. Weick, K. (1979). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1-19.
61. Williams, D., Gore, W., Broches, C., & Lostski, C. (1987). One faculty's perception of its academic governance role. Journal of Higher Education, 58, 6.
62. Yamada. M. (1991). Joint big decision committees and university governance. In R. Birnbaum (Ed.), Faculty in governance: The role of senates and joint committees in academic decision making (pp. 79-96), New Directions for Higher Education, No. 75. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.