Faculty time allocation: A study of change over twenty years

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 454-475

  Milem, Jeffrey F ^a   Berger, Joseph B ^b   Dey, Eric L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^c U of Maryland ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034215268     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2000.11778845     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Allison, P. D., & Stewart, J. A. (1974). Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage. American Sociological Review, 39, 596-606.
2. Astin, A. W. (1977). Four critical years. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Astin, A. W. (1985). Achieving educational excellence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college?: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Astin, A. W., Korn, W. S., & Dey, E. L. (1991). The American college teacher: National norms for the 1989-90 HERI faculty survey. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
6. Bayer, A. E. (1973). Teaching faculty in academe: 1972-73. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
7. Bentley, R., & Blackburn, R. T. (1990). Changes in academic research performance over time: A study of institutional accumulative advantage. Research in Higher Education, 31, 327-344.
8. Birnbaum, R. (1983). Maintaining diversity in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Bok, D. (1992). Reclaiming the public trust. Change, 24(4), 12-19.
10. Bowen, H. R., & Schuster, J. H. (1986). American professors: A national resource imperiled New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities in the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
12. Braxton, J. M. (1996). Contrasting perspectives on the relationship between teaching and research. In J. B. Braxton (Ed.), Faculty teaching and research: Is there a conflict? New Directions for Institutional Research, no. 90. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Braxton, J. M., & Berger, J. B. (1996). Public trust, research activity, and the ideal of service to students as clients of teaching. In J. B. Braxton (Ed.), Faculty teaching and research: Is there a conflict? New Directions for Institutional Research, no. 90. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Cage, M. C. (1991, August). States questioning how much time professors spend working with undergraduate students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 37, pp. 1, 20.
15. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1987). A classification of institutions of higher education (1987 edition). Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
16. Clark, B. R. (1987). The academic life: Small worlds, different worlds. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
17. Dey, E. L., Milem, J. F., & Berger, J. B. (1997). Changing patterns of publication productivity: Accumulative advantage or institutional isomorphism? Sociology of Education, 70(4), 308-323.
18. Dey, E. L., Ramirez, C. E., Korn, W. S., & Astin, A. W. (1993). The American college teacher: National norms for the 1992-93 HERI faculty survey. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
19. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
20. Endo, J. J., & Harpel, R. L. (1982). The effect of student-faculty interaction on students' educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 16, 115-138.
21. Ewell, P. (1994). A preliminary study of the feasibility and utility for national policy of instructional 'good practice' indicators in undergraduate education. Washington, DC: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
22. Fairweather, J. S. (1993a). Academic values and faculty rewards. Review of Higher Education, 17(1), 43-68.
23. Fairweather, J. S. (1993b). Faculty reward structures: Toward institutional and professional homogenization. Research in Higher Education, 34(5), 603-623.
24. Feldman, K. A. (1987). Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration. Research in Higher Education, 26(3), 227-298.
25. Feldman, K. A., & Newcomb, T. M. (1969). The impact of college on students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Finkelstein, M. J. (1984). The American academic profession: A synthesis of social scientific inquiry since World War II. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
27. Hackett, E. J. (1990). Science as a vocation in the 1990s: The changing organizational culture of academic science. Journal of Higher Education, 61, 241-279.
28. Jacobson, R. L. (1992, November 11). Public-college officials struggle to respond to growing concern over faculty productivity. Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A17-18.
29. Jencks, C., & Riesman, D. (1968). The academic revolution. Garden City, NY: Double-day.
30. Kamens, D. H. (1971, Summer). The college 'charter' and college size: Effects on occupational choice and college attrition. Sociology of Education, 44, 270-296.
31. Levinson, R. M. (1989). The faculty and institutional isomorphism. Academe, 75, 1, 23-27.
32. Massy, W. F., & Zemsky, R. (1994). Faculty discretionary time: Departments and the academic ratchet. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 1-22.
33. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 56-63.
34. Meyer, J. W. (1970). The charter: Conditions of diffuse socialization in schools. In W. R. Scott (Ed.), Social processes and social structure (pp. 564-578). New York: Henry Holt.
35. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
36. Newman, F. (1985). Higher education and the American resurgence. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Endowment for the Advancement of Teaching.
37. Olson, J. E. (1994). Institutional and technical constraints on faculty gross productivity in American doctoral universities. Research in Higher Education, 35(5), 549-567.
38. Pace, C. R. (1974). The demise of diversity: A comparative profile of eight types of institutions. Berkeley, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
39. Pascarella, E. T. (1980). Student-faculty informal contact and college outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 50, 545-595.
40. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1980). Student/faculty relationships and freshman year educational outcomes: A further investigation. Journal of College Student Personnel, 21, 521-528.
41. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42. Riesman, D. (1956). The academic procession: Constraint and variety in American higher education. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
43. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1994). Institutional environments and organizations: Structural complexity and individualism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Terenzini, P. T., & Pascarella, E. T. (1980). Student/faculty relationships and freshman year educational outcomes. Journal of College Student Personnel, 21, 521-528.
46. Tierney, W. G., & Rhoads, R. A. (1993). Enhancing promotion, tenure, and beyond: Faculty socialization as a cultural process ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, no. 6. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
47. Volkwein, J. F., Carbone, D. A. (1994). The impact of departmental research and teaching climates on undergraduate growth and satisfaction. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 147-167.