"Principles of good practice" for academic and student affairs partnership programs

Journal of College Student Development

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 235-249

  Whitt, Elizabeth J ^a   Nesheim, Becki Elkins ^b   Guentzel, Melanie J ^d   Kellogg, Angela H ^c   McDonald, William M ^e   Wells, Cynthia A ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b Hospital for Special Surgery

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STEVENS POINT   (United States)

^d ST CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE   (United States)

^f MESSIAH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 45749145894     PISSN: 08975264     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/csd.0.0007     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. American Association for Higher Education, American College Personnel Association, & National Association of Student Personnel Administrators. (1998). Powerful partnerships: A shared responsibility for learning. Washington, DC: Authors.
2. American College Personnel Association. (1994). The student learning imperative: Implications for student affairs. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Astin, A. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Blimling, G. S., Whitt, E. J., & Associates. (1999). Good practice in student affairs: Principles to foster student learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Bourassa, D. M., & Kruger, K. (2001). The national dialogue on academic and student affairs collaboration. In A. Kezar, D. J. Hirsch, & C. Burack (Eds.), Understanding the role of academic and student affairs collaboration in creating a successful learning environment (New Directions for Higher Education No. 116, pp. 9-38). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America's research universities. Stony Brook: State University of New York.
7. Brevard Community College. 2002-2004 Catalog. Brevard Community College: Publications Department.
8. DePaul University. Course catalog 2001-2003: Undergraduate colleges and schools. DePaul University: University Relations.
9. George Mason University. 2003-04 Catalog. George Mason University: Office of University Relations.
10. Kezar, A. (2001). Documenting the landscape: Results of a national study on academic and student affairs collaborations. In A. Kezar, D. J. Hirsch, & C. Burack (Eds.), Understanding the role of academic and student affairs collaboration in creating a successful learning environment (New Directions for Higher Education No. 116, pp. 39-52). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Kezar, A., Hirsch, D. J., & Burack, C. (Eds.) (2001). Understanding the role of academic and student affairs collaboration in creating a successful learning environment (New Directions for Higher Education No. 116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Kolins, C. A. (2000, Winter/Spring). An appraisal of collaboration: Assessing academic and student affairs officers at public two-year colleges. Student Development in the Two-Year Colleges, 14, 9-12.
13. Kuh, G. D. (1996). Guiding principles for creating seamless learning environments for undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 135-148.
14. Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J. L, Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J. & Associates (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Kuh, G. D., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., & Associates. (1991). Involving colleges: Successful approaches to fostering student learning and development outside the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17. Magolda, P. M. (2005). Proceed with caution: Uncommon wisdom about academic and student affairs partnerships. About Campus, 9(6), 16-21.
18. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. Merriam, S. B. (2002). Assessing and evaluating qualitative research. In S. B. Merriam & Associates, Qualitative research in practice: examples for discussion and analysis (pp. 18-33). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. National Association of State Universities and Land Grant Colleges. (1997). Returning to our roots: The student experience. Washington, DC: Author.
21. National Association of State Universities and Land Grant Colleges. (2000). Returning to our roots: Toward a coherent campus culture. Washington, DC: Author.
22. Pascarella, E.T., & Terenzini, P.T. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students, Volume 2: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. Portland Community College. (2001). Diversity Grant Application. Cascade Campus Diversity Committee.
25. Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (1998). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Schroeder, C. (1999a). Partnerships: An imperative for enhancing student learning and institutional effectiveness. In J. H. Schuh & E. J. Whitt (Eds.), Creating successful partnerships between academic and student affairs (New Directions for Student Services No. 87, pp. 5-18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. Schroeder, C. (1999b). Forging educational partnerships that advance student learning. In G. S. Blimling & E. J. Whitt (Eds.), Good practice in student affairs: Principles to foster student learning (pp. 133-156). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Schroeder, C. (2004). Collaborative partnerships between academic and student affairs .In J. Gardner, & L. Upcraft & B. Barefoot (Eds.), Challenging and supporting the first-year student: A Handbook for Improving the First Year of College (pp. 204-220) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. U.S. Department of Education. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education. Washington DC: Author.