A proposed test of temporal nonlocality in bistable perception

Journal of Mathematical Psychology

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 314-321

  Atmanspacher, Harald ^a   Filk, Thomas ^a,b,c  

^a Institute for Frontier Areas of Psychology   (Germany)

^b PARMENIDES FOUNDATION   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952420014     PISSN: 00222496     EISSN: 10960880     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2009.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aerts D. Quantum structure in cognition. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2009, 53:314-348.
2. Aerts D., Aerts S. Applications of quantum statistics in psychological studies of decision processes. Foundations of Science 1994, 1:85-97.
3. Aspect A., Dalibard J., Roger G. Experimental test of Bell's inequalities using time-varying analyzers. Physical Review Letters 1982, 49:1804-1807.
4. Atmanspacher H. Quantum approaches to consciousness. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy 2004, Winter 2004 Edition. E.N. Zalta (Ed.).
5. Atmanspacher H., Amann A. Positive operator valued measures and projection valued measures of non-commutative time operators. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 1998, 37:629-650.
6. Atmanspacher H., Bach M., Filk T., Kornmeier J., Römer H. Cognitive time scales in a Necker-Zeno model for bistable perception. Open Cybernetics and Systemics Journal 2008, 2:234-251.
7. Atmanspacher H., Fach W. Acategoriality as mental instability. Journal of Mind and Behavior 2005, 26:181-206.
8. Atmanspacher H., Filk T. Discrimination and sequentialization of events in perception. The nature of time: Geometry, physics, and perception 2003, 67-75. Kluwer, Dordrecht. R. Buccheri (Ed.).
9. Atmanspacher H., Filk T., Römer H. Quantum Zeno features of bistable perception. Biological Cybernetics 2004, 90:33-40.
10. Atmanspacher H., Filk T., Römer H. Weak quantum theory: Formal framework and selected applications. Quantum theory: Reconsideration of foundations-3 2006, 34-46. American Institute of Physics, New York. G. Adenier (Ed.).
11. Atmanspacher H., Filk T., Römer H. Complementarity in bistable perception. Recasting reality-Wolfgang Pauli's philosophical ideas in contemporary science 2008, 135-150. Springer, Berlin. H. Atmanspacher, H. Primas (Eds.).
12. Atmanspacher H., Römer H., Walach H. Weak quantum theory: Complementarity and entanglement in physics and beyond. Foundations of Physics 2002, 32:379-406.
13. Atmanspacher H., Scheingraber H. A fundamental link between system theory and statistical mechanics. Foundations of Physics 1987, 17:939-963.
14. Bell J.S. On the problem of hidden variables in quantum theory. Reviews of Modern Physics 1966, 38:447-452.
15. Bishop R.C., Atmanspacher H. Contextual emergence in the description of properties. Foundations of Physics 2006, 36:1753-1777.
16. Blake R., Logothetis N. Visual competition. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 3:1-11.
17. Brascamp J.W., van Ee R., Pestman W.R., van den Berg A.V. Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception. Journal of Vision 2005, 5:287-298.
18. Bruza P., Cole R. Quantum logic of semantic space: An exploratory investigation of context effects in practical reasoning. We will show them: Essays in honour of Dov Gabbay. Vol. 1 2005, 339-361. College Publications, London. S. Artemov, H. Barringer, A.S. dAvila Garcez, L.C. Lamb, J. Woods (Eds.).
19. Busemeyer J., Wang Z., Townsend J.T. Quantum dynamics of human decision making. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2006, 50:220-241.
20. d'Espagnat B. The quantum theory and reality. Scientific American 1979, 241:158-181.
21. deWitt B.S. Quantum mechanics and reality. Physics Today 1970, (Sept.):30-35.
22. Einstein A., Podolsky B., Rosen N. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?. Physical Review 1935, 47:777-780.
23. Eisert J., Wilkens M., Lewenstein M. Quantum games and quantum strategies. Physical Review Letters 1999, 83:3077-3080. Comment by S.C. Benjamin and P.M. Hayden, Physical Review Letters 87, 069801 (2001), and reply by the authors, Physical Review Letters 87, 069802 (2001).
24. Everett H. Relative state formulation of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics 1957, 29:454-462.
25. Niels Bohr collected works. Volume 10. Complementarity beyond physics 1999, 1928-1962. Amsterdam, Elsevier. D. Favrholdt (Ed.).
26. Filk T., von Müller A. Quantum physics and consciousness: The quest for a common conceptual foundation. Mind and Matter 2009, 7:59-79.
27. Franck G., Atmanspacher H. A proposed relation between intensity of presence and duration of nowness. Recasting reality-Wolfgang Pauli's philosophical ideas in contemporary science 2008, 211-225. Springer, Berlin. H. Atmanspacher, H. Primas (Eds.).
28. Gustafson K., Misra B. Canonical commutation relations of quantum mechanics and stochastic regularity. Letters in Mathematical Physics 1976, 1:275-280.
29. Holton G. The roots of complementarity. Daedalus 1970, 99:1015-1055.
30. Kochen S., Specker E. The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 1967, 17:59-87.
31. Kornmeier J., Ehm W., Bigalke H., Bach M. Discontinuous presentation of ambiguous figures: How interstimulus-interval duration affects reversal dynamics and ERPs. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:552-560.
32. Leggett A.J., Garg A. Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism: Is the flux there when nobody looks?. Physical Review Letters 1985, 54:857-860.
33. Long G.M., Toppino T.C. Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: Alternating views of reversible figures. Psychological Bulletin 2004, 130:748-768.
34. Mahler G. Temporal Bell inequalities: A journey to the limits of consistent histories". Inside versus outside. Endo- and exo-concepts of observation and knowledge in physics, philosophy and cognitive science 1994, 195-205. Springer, Berlin. H. Atmanspacher, G. Dalenoort (Eds.).
35. Mahler G. Nonlocality in quantum dynamics. Time, temporality, now 1997, 347-363. Springer, Berlin. H. Atmanspacher, E. Ruhnau (Eds.).
36. Mermin N.D. What's wrong with these elements of reality?. Physics Today 1990, (June):9. See also: Quantum mysteries revisited, American Journal of Physics, 58, 731-734 (1990).
37. Misra B. Nonequilibrium entropy, Lyapounov variables, and ergodic properties of classical systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1978, 75:1627-1631.
38. Misra B., Sudarshan E.C.G. The Zeno's paradox in quantum theory. Journal of Mathematical Physics 1977, 18:756-763.
39. Necker L.A. Observations on some remarkable phenomenon which occurs in viewing a figure of a crystal or geometrical solid. The London and Edinburgh Philosophy Magazine and Journal of Science 1832, 3:329-337.
40. Orbach J., Zucker E., Olson R. Reversibility of the Necker cube: VII. Reversal rate as a function of figure-on and figure-off durations. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1966, 22:615-618.
41. Pöppel E. A hierarchical model of temporal perception. Trends in Cognitive Science 1997, 1:56-61.
42. Primas H. Non-Boolean descriptions for mind-matter problems. Mind and Matter 2007, 5:7-44.
43. Primas H. Complementarity of mind and matter. Recasting reality-Wolfgang Pauli's philosophical ideas in contemporary science 2008, 171-209. Springer, Berlin. H. Atmanspacher, H. Primas (Eds.).
44. Sudarshan E.C.G. Perception of quantum systems. Old and new questions in physics, cosmology, philosophy, and theoretical biology 1983, 457-467. Plenum, New York. A. van der Merwe (Ed.).
45. Tjøstheim D. A commutation relation for wide sense stationary processes. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 1976, 30:115-122.
46. vanRullen R., Reddy L., Koch C. The continuous wagon wheel illusion is associated with changes in electroencephalogram power at 13 Hz. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 26:502-507.
47. vanRullen, R. (2009). Private communication.