Disrupting parietal function prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry

Current Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 23, 2010, Pages 2106-2111

  Zaretskaya, Natalia ^a   Thielscher, Axel ^b   Logothetis, Nikos K ^b,c   Bartels, Andreas ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; BRAIN MAPPING; EYE DOMINANCE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARIETAL LOBE; PHYSIOLOGY; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISION;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PARIETAL LOBE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78650168890     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.046     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. E.D. Lumer, K.J. Friston, and G. Rees Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain Science 280 1998 1930 1934
2. A. Kleinschmidt, C. Büchel, S. Zeki, and R.S.J. Frackowiak Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures Proc. Biol. Sci. 265 1998 2427 2433
3. P. Sterzer, and A. Kleinschmidt A neural basis for inference in perceptual ambiguity Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 2007 323 328
4. C.L. Paffen, D. Alais, and F.A. Verstraten Attention speeds binocular rivalry Psychol. Sci. 17 2006 752 756
5. D. Alais, J.J. van Boxtel, A. Parker, and R. van Ee Attending to auditory signals slows visual alternations in binocular rivalry Vision Res. 50 2010 929 935
6. R. Kanai, B. Bahrami, and G. Rees Human parietal cortex structure predicts individual differences in perceptual rivalry Curr. Biol. 20 2010 1626 1630
7. M. Corbetta, and G.L. Shulman Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3 2002 201 215
8. R. Blake, and N.K. Logothetis Visual competition Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3 2002 13 21
9. F. Tong, M. Meng, and R. Blake Neural bases of binocular rivalry Trends Cogn. Sci. 10 2006 502 511
10. J.D. Haynes, R. Deichmann, and G. Rees Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus Nature 438 2005 496 499
11. K. Wunderlich, K.A. Schneider, and S. Kastner Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus Nat. Neurosci. 8 2005 1595 1602
12. T.A. Carlson, and S. He Competing global representations fail to initiate binocular rivalry Neuron 43 2004 907 914
13. T.L. Watson, J. Pearson, and C.W. Clifford Perceptual grouping of biological motion promotes binocular rivalry Curr. Biol. 14 2004 1670 1674
14. A. Bartels, and N.K. Logothetis Binocular rivalry: A time dependence of monocular and percept contributions J. Vis. 10 2010 1 14
15. M. Meng, and F. Tong Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures J. Vis. 4 2004 539 551
16. D. Carmel, V. Walsh, N. Lavie, and G. Rees Right parietal TMS shortens dominance durations in binocular rivalry Curr. Biol. 20 2010 R799 R800
17. S. Suzuki, and M. Grabowecky Long-term speeding in perceptual switches mediated by attention-dependent plasticity in cortical visual processing Neuron 56 2007 741 753
18. S.D. Slotnick, and S. Yantis Common neural substrates for the control and effects of visual attention and perceptual bistability Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 24 2005 97 108
19. J. Britz, M.A. Pitts, and C.M. Michel Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation during binocular rivalry Hum. Brain Mapp. 2010 10.1002/hbm.21117 Published online August 5, 2010
20. Y.S. Bonneh, M. Pavlovskaya, H. Ring, and N. Soroker Abnormal binocular rivalry in unilateral neglect: Evidence for a non-spatial mechanism of extinction Neuroreport 15 2004 473 477
21. J.W. Brascamp, R. van Ee, W.R. Pestman, and A.V. van den Berg Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception J. Vis. 5 2005 287 298
22. B. Schenkluhn, C.C. Ruff, K. Heinen, and C.D. Chambers Parietal stimulation decouples spatial and feature-based attention J. Neurosci. 28 2008 11106 11110
23. D.M. Beck, N. Muggleton, V. Walsh, and N. Lavie Right parietal cortex plays a critical role in change blindness Cereb. Cortex 16 2006 712 717
24. C.C. Ruff, F. Blankenburg, O. Bjoertomt, S. Bestmann, N. Weiskopf, and J. Driver Hemispheric differences in frontal and parietal influences on human occipital cortex: Direct confirmation with concurrent TMS-fMRI J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21 2009 1146 1161
25. S.L. Bressler, W. Tang, C.M. Sylvester, G.L. Shulman, and M. Corbetta Top-down control of human visual cortex by frontal and parietal cortex in anticipatory visual spatial attention J. Neurosci. 28 2008 10056 10061
26. J. Pearson, D. Tadin, and R. Blake The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual rivalry J. Vis. 7 2007 2.1 2.11
27. H.R. Wilson Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 2003 14499 14503
28. S.C. Chong, D. Tadin, and R. Blake Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry J. Vis. 5 2005 1004 1012
29. R. van Ee, L.C. van Dam, and G.J. Brouwer Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability Vision Res. 45 2005 41 55
30. N.S. Ward, S. Bestmann, G. Hartwigsen, M.M. Weiss, L.O. Christensen, R.S. Frackowiak, J.C. Rothwell, and H.R. Siebner Low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation over left dorsal premotor cortex improves the dynamic control of visuospatially cued actions J. Neurosci. 30 2010 9216 9223
31. B. Drager, C. Breitenstein, U. Helmke, S. Kamping, and S. Knecht Specific and nonspecific effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on picture-word verification Eur. J. Neurosci. 20 2004 1681 1687
32. O.L. Carter, F. Hasler, J.D. Pettigrew, G.M. Wallis, G.B. Liu, and F.X. Vollenweider Psilocybin links binocular rivalry switch rate to attention and subjective arousal levels in humans Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 195 2007 415 424
33. G. Badzakova-Trajkov, I.S. Haberling, R.P. Roberts, and M.C. Corballis Cerebral asymmetries: Complementary and independent processes PLoS ONE 5 2010 e9682
34. S.P. Stone, P.W. Halligan, and R.J. Greenwood The incidence of neglect phenomena and related disorders in patients with an acute right or left-hemisphere stroke Age Ageing 22 1993 46 52
35. F.M. Mottaghy, B.J. Krause, L.J. Kemna, R. Topper, L. Tellmann, M. Beu, A. Pascual-Leone, and H.W. Muller-Gartner Modulation of the neuronal circuitry subserving working memory in healthy human subjects by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation Neurosci. Lett. 280 2000 167 170
36. N. Arai, S. Okabe, T. Furubayashi, Y. Terao, K. Yuasa, and Y. Ugawa Comparison between short train, monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the human motor cortex Clin. Neurophysiol. 116 2005 605 613