Differences in top - Down influences on the reversal rate of different categories of reversible figures

Perception

Volumn 28, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 1185-1196

  Strüber, Daniel ^a   Stadler, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; TIME; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0033251940     PISSN: 03010066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/p2973     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Attneave F, 1971 "Multistability in perception" Scientific American 225 62-71
2. Babich S, Standing L, 1981 "Satiation effects with reversible figures" Perceptual & Motor Skills 52 203-210
3. Borsellino B, Carlini F, Riani M, Tuccio M T, De Marco A, Penengo P, Trabucco A, 1982 "Effects of visual angle on perspective reversal for ambiguous patterns" Perception 11 263-273
4. Brown K. T, 1955 "Rate of apparent change in a dynamic ambiguous figure as a function of observation time" American Journal of Psychology 68 358-371
5. Cohen L, 1959 "Rate of apparent change of a Necker cube as a function of prior stimulation" American Journal of Psychology 72 327-344
6. Flügel J C, 1913 "The influence of attention in illusions of reversible perspective" British Journal of Psychology 5 357-397
7. Girgus J J, Rock I, Egatz R, 1977 "The effect of knowledge of reversibility on the reversibility of ambiguous figures" Perception & Psychophysics 22 550-556
8. Gomez C, Argandona E D, Solier R G, Angulo J C, Vazquez M, 1995 "Timing and competition in networks representing ambiguous figures" Brain and Cognition 29 103-114
9. Gregory R L, 1970 The Intelligent Eye (New York: McGraw-Hill)
10. Grünau M W von, Wiggin S, Reed M, 1984 "The local character of perspective organization" Perception & Psychophysics 35 319-324
11. Harris J P, 1980 "How does adaptation to disparity affect the perception of reversible figures?" American Journal of Psychology 93 445-447
12. Hochberg J, 1950 "Figure - ground reversal as a function of visual satiation" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 682-686
13. Hochberg J, Peterson M A, 1987 "Piecemeal organization and cognitive components in object perception: Perceptually coupled responses to moving objects" Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116 370-380
14. Hock H S, Schöner G, Hochstein S, 1996 "Perceptual stability and the selective adaptation of perceived and unperceived motion directions" Vision Research 36 3311-3323
15. Horlitz K L, O'Leary A, 1993 "Satiation or availability? Effects of attention, memory, and imagery on the perception of ambiguous figures" Perception & Psychophysics 53 668-681
16. Jastrow J, 1900 Fact and Fable in Psychology (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin)
17. Köhler W, 1940 Dynamics in Psychology (New York: Liveright)
18. Kruse P, Stadler M, Strüber D, 1991 "Psychological modification and synergetic modelling of perceptual oscillations", in Rhythms in Physiological Systems Eds H Haken, H P Koepchen (Berlin: Springer) pp 299-311
19. Kruse P, Stadler M, Wehner T, 1986 "Direction and frequency specific processing in the perception of long-range apparent movement" Vision Research 26 327-335
20. Liebert R M, Burk B, 1985 "Voluntary control of reversible figures" Perceptual & Motor Skills 61 1307-1310
21. Long G M, Olszewski A D, 1999 "To reverse or not to reverse: When is an ambiguous figure not ambiguous?" American Journal of Psychology 112 41-71
22. Long G M, Toppino T C, 1994 "A new twist on the rotating-trapezoid illusion: evidence for neural-adaptation effects" Perception 23 619-634
23. Long G M, Toppino T C, Mondin G W, 1992 "Prime time: Fatigue and set effects in the perception of reversible figures" Perception & Psychophysics 52 609-616
24. Nawrot M, Blake R, 1989 "Neural integration of information specifying structure from stereopsis and motion" Science 244 716-718
25. Palmer S, Bucher N M, 1981 "Configural effects in perceived pointing of ambiguous triangles" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 7 88-114
26. Pelton L H, Solley C M, 1968 "Acceleration of reversals of a Necker cube" American Journal of Psychology 31 585-589
27. Peterson M A, Harvey, E M, Weidenbacher H J, 1991 "Shape recognition contributions to figure -ground reversal: Which route counts?" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17 1075-1089
28. Peterson M A, Hochberg J, 1983 "Opposed-set measurement procedure: A quantitative analysis of the role of local cues and intention in form perception" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 9 183-193
29. Peterson M A, Kihlstrom J F, Rose P M, Glisky M L, 1992 "Mental images can be ambiguous: Reconstruals and reference-frame reversals" Memory and Cognition 20 107-123
30. Price J R, 1969 "Effect of extended observation on reversible perspective duration" Psychonomic Science 16 75-76
31. Rock I, 1956 "The orientation of forms on the retina and in the environment" American Journal of Psychology 69 513-528
32. Rock I, 1983 The Logic of Perception (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
33. Rock I, Hall S, Davis J, 1994 "Why do ambiguous figures reverse?" Acta Psychologica 87 33-59
34. Rock I, Mitchener K, 1992 "Further evidence of failure of reversal of ambiguous figures by uninformed subjects" Perception 21 39-45
35. Rubin E, 1921 Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren (Copenhagen: Gyldendalske)
36. Seth S, Reddy N Y, 1979 "Manifest anxiety and perceptual shift in adolescents" Child Psychiatry Quarterly 12 17-24
37. Toppino T C, Long G M, 1987 "Selective adaptation with reversible figures: Don't change that channel" Perception & Psychophysics 42 37-48
38. Tsal Y, Kolbet L, 1985 "Disambiguating ambiguous figures by selective attention" Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 12 97-136
39. Virsu V, 1975 "Determinants of perspective reversals" Nature (London) 257 786-787
40. Wong E, Weisstein N, 1983 "Sharp targets are detected better against a figure, and blurred targets are detected better against a background" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 9 194-202