When and where is binocular rivalry resolved in the visual cortex?

Journal of Vision

Volumn 10, Issue 14, 2010, Pages 1-11

  Pitts, Michael A ^a   Martínez, Antígona ^a,b   Hillyard, Steven A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NATHAN S KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Bistable perception; C1; ERP; Perceptual rivalry; Spatial frequency

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VISUAL CORTEX;

ADOLESCENT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL CORTEX; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79251542062     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/10.14.1     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Ales, J. M., Yates, J. L., & Norcia, A. M. (2010). V1 is not uniquely identified by polarity reversals to upper and lower visual field stimuli. Neuroimage, 52, 1401-1409.
2. Brascamp, J. W., Pearson, J., Blake, R., & van den Berg, A. V. (2009). Intermittent ambiguous stimuli: Implicit memory causes periodic perceptual alternations. Journal of Vision, 9(3):3, 1-23, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/3/3, doi:10.1167/9.3.3.
3. Brouwer, G. J., & van Ee, R. (2007). Visual cortex allows prediction of perceptual states during ambiguous structure-from-motion. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 1015-1023.
4. Butler, P. D., Martinez, A., Foxe, J. J., Kim, D., Zemon, V., Silipo, G., et al. (2007). Subcortical visual dysfunction in schizophrenia drives secondary cortical impairments. Brain, 130, 417-430.
5. Clark, V. P., Fan, S., & Hillyard, S. (1995). Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses. Human Brain Mapping, 2, 170-187.
6. Cosmelli, D., David, O., Lachaux, J. P., Martinerie, J., Garnero, L., Renault, B., et al. (2004). Waves of consciousness: Ongoing cortical patterns during binocular rivalry. Neuroimage, 23, 128-140.
7. Di Russo, F., Martinez, A., & Hillyard, S. A. (2003). Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-spatial attention. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 486-499.
8. Di Russo, F., Martinez, A., Sereno, M. I., Pitzalis, S., & Hillyard, S. (2001). Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping, 15, 95-111.
9. Di Russo, F., Pitzalis, S., Spitoni, G., Aprile, T., Patria, F., Spinelli, D., et al. (2005). Identification of the neural sources of the pattern-reversal VEP. Neuroimage, 24, 874-886.
10. Doesburg, S. M., Kitajo, K., & Ward, L. M. (2005). Increased gamma-band synchrony precedes switching of conscious perceptual objects in binocular rivalry. Neuroreport, 16, 1139-1142.
11. Fahrenfort, J. J., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. (2007). Masking disrupts reentrant processing in human visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1488-1497.
12. Fang, F., & He, S. (2005). Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1380-1385.
13. Haynes, J. D., Deichmann, R., & Rees, G. (2005). Eyespecific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature, 438, 496-499.
14. Heinen, K., Jolij, J., & Lamme, V. A. (2005). Figure-ground segregation requires two distinct periods of activity in V1: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Neuroreport, 16, 1483-1487.
15. Kamphuisen, A., Bauer, M., & van Ee, R. (2008). No evidence for widespread synchronized networks in binocular rivalry: MEG frequency tagging entrains primarily early visual cortex. Journal of Vision, 8(5):4, 1-8, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/8/5/4, doi:10.1167/8.5.4.
16. Kenemans, J. L., Baas, J. M., Mangun, G. R., Lijffijt, M., & Verbaten, M. N. (2000). On the processing of spatial frequencies as revealed by evoked-potential source modeling. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 1113-1123.
17. Khoe, W., Mitchell, J. F., Reynolds, J. H., & Hillyard, S. A. (2008). ERP evidence that surface-based attention biases interocular competition during rivalry. Journal of Vision, 8(3):18, 1-11, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/8/3/18, doi:10.1167/8.3.18.
18. Kornmeier, J., & Bach, M. (2004). Early neural activity in Necker-cube reversal: Evidence for low-level processing of a gestalt phenomenon. Psychophysiology, 41, 1-8.
19. Lamme, V. A. (1995). The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 1605-1615.
20. Lamme, V. A., Zipser, K., & Spekreijse, H. (1998). Figure-ground activity in primary visual cortex is suppressed by anesthesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 3263-3268.
21. Lamme, V. A., Zipser, K., & Spekreijse, H. (2002). Masking interrupts figure-ground signals in V1. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1044-1053.
22. Lee, S. H., Blake, R., & Heeger, D. J. (2005). Traveling waves of activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 22-23.
23. Lee, S. H., Blake, R., & Heeger, D. J. (2007). Hierarchy of cortical responses underlying binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1048-1054.
24. Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1996). Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature, 379, 549-553.
25. Logothetis, N. K. (1998). Single units and conscious vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 353, 1801-1818.
26. Logothetis, N. K., & Schall, J. D. (1989). Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. Science, 245, 761-763.
27. Lumer, E. D., Friston, K. J., & Rees, G. (1998). Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science, 280, 1930-1934.
28. Lumer, E. D., & Rees, G. (1999). Covariation of activity in visual and prefrontal cortex associated with subjective visual perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of United States of America, 96, 1669-1673.
29. Maier, A., Wilke, M., Aura, C., Zhu, C., Ye, F. Q., & Leopold, D. A. (2008). Divergence of fMRI and neural signals in V1 during perceptual suppression in the awake monkey. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1193-1200.
30. Martinez, A., Anllo-Vento, L., Sereno, M. I., Frank, L. R., Buxton, R. B., Dubowitz, D. J., et al. (1999). Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 364-369.
31. Martinez, A., DiRusso, F., Anllo-Vento, L., Sereno, M. I., Buxton, R. B., & Hillyard, S. A. (2001). Putting spatial attention on the map: Timing and localization of stimulus selection processes in striate and extrastriate visual areas. Vision Research, 41, 1437-1457.
32. Meng, M., Remus, D. A., & Tong, F. (2005). Filling-in of visual phantoms in the human brain. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1248-1254.
33. Michel, C. M., Murray, M. M., Lantz, G., Gonzalez, S., Spinelli, L., & Grave de Peralta, R. (2004). EEG source imaging. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 2195-2222.
34. Miller, S. M., Liu, G. B., Ngo, T. T., Hooper, G., Riek, S., Carson, R. G., et al. (2000). Interhemispheric switching mediates perceptual rivalry. Current Biology, 10, 383-392.
35. Mishra, J., & Hillyard, S. A. (2009). Endogenous attention selection during binocular rivalry at early stages of visual processing. Vision Research, 49, 1073-1080.
36. Pascual-Marqui, R. D., Michel, C. M., & Lehmann, D. (1994). Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: A new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 18, 49-65.
37. Pasley, B. N., Mayes, L. C., & Schultz, R. T. (2004). Subcortical discrimination of unperceived objects during binocular rivalry. Neuron, 42, 163-172.
38. Pitts, M. A., Martinez, A., Stalmaster, C., Nerger, J. L., & Hillyard, S. A. (2009). Neural generators of ERPs linked with Necker cube reversals. Psychophysiology, 46, 694-702.
39. Polonsky, A., Blake, R., Braun, J., & Heeger, D. J. (2000). Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1153-1159.
40. Proverbio, A. M., Zani, A., & Avella, C. (1996). Differential activation of multiple current sources of foveal VEPs as a function of spatial frequency. Brain Topography, 9, 59-68.
41. Raemaekers, M., van der Schaaf, M. E., van Ee, R., & van Wezel, R. J. (2009). Widespread fMRI activity differences between perceptual states in visual rivalry are correlated with differences in observer biases. Brain Research, 1252, 161-171.
42. Roeber, U., & Schroger, E. (2004). Binocular rivalry is partly resolved at early processing stages with steady and with flickering presentation: A human eventrelated brain potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 371, 51-54.
43. Roeber, U., Widmann, A., Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., Herrmann, C. S., O'Shea, R. P., & Schroger, E. (2008). Early correlates of visual awareness in the human brain: Time and place from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Vision, 8(3):21, 1-12, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/8/3/21, doi:10.1167/8.3.21.
44. Scherg, M., & Picton, T. W. (1991). Separation and identification of event-related potential components by brain electric source analysis. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 42, 24-37.
45. Scholte, H. S., Jolij, J., Fahrenfort, J. J., & Lamme, V. A. (2008). Feedforward and recurrent processing in scene segmentation: Electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 2097-2109.
46. Scholte, H. S., Witteveen, S. C., Spekreijse, H., & Lamme, V. A. (2006). The influence of inattention on the neural correlates of scene segmentation. Brain Research, 1076, 106-115.
47. Sheinberg, D. L., & Logothetis, N. K. (1997). The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 3408-3413.
48. Srinivasan, R., Russell, D. P., Edelman, G.M., & Tononi, G. (1999). Increased synchronization of neuromagnetic responses during conscious perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 5435-5448.
49. Sterzer, P., & Rees, G. (2008). A neural basis for percept stabilization in binocular rivalry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 389-399.
50. Super, H., & Lamme, V. A. (2007). Altered figure-ground perception in monkeys with an extra-striate lesion. Neuropsychologia, 45, 3329-3334.
51. Super, H., Spekreijse, H., & Lamme, V. A. (2001). Two distinct modes of sensory processing observed in monkey primary visual cortex (V1). Nature Neuroscience, 4, 304-310.
52. Tong, F., & Engel, S. A. (2001). Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature, 411, 195-199.
53. Tong, F., Meng, M., & Blake, R. (2006). Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 502-511.
54. Valle-Inclan, F., Hackley, S. A., de Labra, C., & Alvarez, A. (1999). Early visual processing during binocular rivalry-studied with visual evoked potentials. Neuroreport, 10, 21-25.
55. Wolfe, J. (1983). Influence of spatial frequency, luminance, and duration on binocular rivalry and abnormal fusion of briefly presented dichoptic stimuli. Perception, 12, 447-456.
56. Wunderlich, K., Schneider, K. A., & Kastner, S. (2005). Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1595-1602.