Feasibility of iterative learning control mediated by functional electrical stimulation for reaching after stroke

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 559-568

  Hughes, A M ^a   Freeman, C T ^a   Burridge, J H ^a   Chappell, P H ^a   Lewin, P L ^a   Rogers, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arm movement; Functional electrical stimulation; Hemiplegia; Iterative learning control; Robotic therapy; Stroke rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; HAND MOVEMENT; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; ISOMETRICS; ITERATIVE LEARNING CONTROL; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; ROBOTICS; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRICEPS BRACHII MUSCLE;

ADULT; AGED; ELECTRIC STIMULATION THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PARESIS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 67651024488     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968308328718     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. van der Putten Jjmf, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999 ; 66: 480-484. (Pubitemid 29145683)
2. Kwakkel G., Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC Therapy impact on functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation: a critical review of the literature. Physiotherapy. 1999 ; 85: 377-391.
3. Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R., Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail HM The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983 ; 46: 521-524.
4. Winstein CJ, Rose DK, Tan SM, Lewthwaite R., Chui HC, Azen SP A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: a pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 ; 85: 620-628. (Pubitemid 38881052)
5. Byl NN, Pitsch E., Abrams GM Functional outcomes can vary by dose: learning-based sensorimotor training for patients stable poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 ; 22: 494-504.
6. Colombo R., Pisano F., Micera S., et al. Assessing mechanisms of recovery during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremity. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 ; 22: 50-63. (Pubitemid 350223137)
7. Volpe BT, Lynch D., Rykman-Berland A., et al. Intensive sensorimotor arm training mediated by therapist or robot improves hemiparesis in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 ; 22: 305-310. (Pubitemid 351561668)
8. Kwakkel G., Kollen BJ, Krebs HI Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 ; 22: 111-121. (Pubitemid 351287594)
9. Beer RF, Dewald JP, Dawson ML, Rymer WZ Target-dependent differences between free and constrained arm movements in chronic hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res. 2004 ; 156: 458-470. (Pubitemid 38822613)
10. Schmidt RA, Lee TD Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioural Emphasis. 3 rd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics ; 1999.
11. Burridge JH, Ladouceur M. Clinical and therapeutic applications of neuromuscular stimulation: a review of current use and speculation into future developments. Neuromodulation. 2001 ; 4: 147-154.
12. Alon G., Levitt A., McCarthy PA Functional electrical stimulation enhancement of upper extremity functional recovery during stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 ; 21: 207-215. (Pubitemid 46633595)
13. De Kroon JR, IJzerman MJ, Chae J., Lankhorst GJ, Zilvold G. Relation between stimulation characteristics and clinical outcome in studies using electrical stimulation to improve motor control of the upper extremity in stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2005 ; 37: 65-74. (Pubitemid 40439460)
14. Francisco G., Chae J., Chawla H., et al. Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation for improving the arm function of acute stroke survivors: a randomized pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 ; 79: 570-575. (Pubitemid 28222171)
15. Bowman BR, Baker LL, Walker RL Positional feedback and electrical stimulation: an automated treatment for the hemiplegic wrist. Arch Phys Med. 1979 ; 60: 497-501.
16. Ridding MC, McKay DR, Thompson PD, Miles TS Changes in corticomotor representations induced by prolonged peripheral nerve stimulation in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 ; 112: 1461-1469. (Pubitemid 32673715)
17. Dou H., Tan KK, Lee TH, Zhou Z. Iterative learning feedback control of human limbs via functional electrical stimulation. Control Eng Pract. 1999 ; 7: 315-325.
18. Freeman CT, Hughes AM, Burridge JH, Chappell PH, Lewin PL, Rogers E. A robotic workstation for stroke rehabilitation of the upper extremity using FES [published online ahead of print July 18, 2008]. Med Eng Phys. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.05.008.
19. Freeman CT, Hughes AM, Burridge JH, Chappell PH, Lewin PL, Rogers E. A model of the upper extremity using FES for stroke rehabilitation [published online ahead of print December 18, 2008]. ASME J Biomech Eng. doi: 10.1115/1.3005332.
20. Freeman CT, Hughes AM, Burridge JH, Chappell PH, Lewin PL, Rogers E. Iterative learning control of FES applied to the upper extremity for rehabilitation [published online ahead of print October 21, 2008]. Control Eng Pract. doi: 10.1016/ j.conengprac.2008.08.003.
21. Yozbatiran N., Der-Yeghiaian L., Cramer S. A standardized approach to performing the Action Research Arm Test. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 ; 22: 78-90. (Pubitemid 350223140)
22. Lyle RC A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981 ; 4: 483-492.
23. van der Lee JH, De Groot V., Beckerman H., Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 ; 82: 14-19. (Pubitemid 32057613)
24. Gladstone DJ, Danells C, Black SE The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002 ; 16: 232-240. (Pubitemid 34984898)
25. Hsieh CL, Hsueh IP, Chiang FM, Lin PH Inter-rater reliability and validity of the action research arm test in stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1998 ; 27: 107-113.
26. Matthews JNS, Altman D., Campbell MJ, Royston P. Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. Br Med J Clin Res. 1990 ; 300: 230-235. (Pubitemid 20045528)
27. Brunnstrom S. Movement Therapy in Hemiplegia. New York: Harper & Row ; 1970.
28. Dewald JPA, Pope PS, Given JD, Buchanan TS, Rymer WZ Abnormal muscle coactivation patterns during isometric torque generation at the elbow and shoulder in hemiparetic subjects. Brain. 1995 ; 118: 495-510.
29. van der Lee JH, Beckerman H., Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Med. 2001 ; 33: 110-113. (Pubitemid 32479326)
30. Ferraro M., Palazzolo JJ, Krol J., Krebs HI, Hogan N., Volpe BT Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke. Neurology. 2003 ; 61: 1604-1607. (Pubitemid 37505588)
31. Stein J., Krebs HI, Frontera WR, Fasoli SE, Hughes R., Hogan N. Comparison of two techniques of robot-aided upper limb exercise training after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 ; 83: 720-728. (Pubitemid 39100341)
32. Rushton DN Functional electrical stimulation and rehabilitation: a hypothesis. Med Eng Phys. 2003 ; 25: 75-78. (Pubitemid 35453968)
33. Ada L., O'Dwyer N., O'Neill E. Relation between spasticity, weakness and contracture of the elbow flexors and upper limb activity after stroke: an observational study. Disabil Rehabil. 2006 ; 28: 891-897. (Pubitemid 43916272)