Mind the gaps: Using patterns to change everyday classroom practice towards contingent CSCL teaching

Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: CSCL 2011 Conference Proceedings - Long Papers, 9th International Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2011, Pages 518-525

  Prieto, Luis P ^a   Villagrá Sobrino, Sara ^a   Dimitriadis, Yannis ^a   Schank, Patricia ^a   Penuel, William ^b   DeBarger, Angela Haydel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

^b SRI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSROOM PRACTICES; COLLABORATIVE KNOWLEDGE; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING TOOLS; EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH; INDEPENDENT RESEARCH; LESSON PLANS; STUDENT KNOWLEDGE;

RESEARCH;

TEACHING;

EID: 84858431503     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Alexander, R. (2008) Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk, 4th edition. York, UK: Dialogos.
2. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3. Anderson, R., Anderson, R., Davis, P., Linnell, N., Prince, P., Razmov, V., & Videon, F. (2007). Classroom Presenter: Enhancing interactive education with digital ink. IEEE Computer, 9, 56-61.
4. Beatty, I., Gerace, W., Leonard, W., & Dufresne, R. (2006). Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. American Journal of Physics, 74(1), 31-39. (Pubitemid 43105958)
5. Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
6. Conole, G., McAndrew, P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (in press). The role of CSCL pedagogical patterns as mediating artifacts for repurposing Open Educational Resources. In F. Pozzi & D. Persico (Eds.), Techniques for fostering collaboration in online learning communities: Theoretical and practical perspectives. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
7. DeBarger, A., Penuel, W., Harris, C., & Schank, P. (2010). Teaching routines to enhance collaboration using classroom network technology. In F. Pozzi & D. Persico (Eds.), Techniques for fostering collaboration in online learning communities (pp. 222-244). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
8. DiGiano, C., Yarnall, L., Patton, C., Roschelle, J., Tatar, D., & Manley, M. (2003). Collaboration design patterns: Conceptual tools for planning for the wireless classroom. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 19(3), 284-297. (Pubitemid 38422751)
9. Dillenbourg, P. (2009). Exploring neglected planes: social signals and class orchestration. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning - Volume 2 (pp. 6-7). New Brunswick, NJ: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
10. Dimitriadis, Y., Asensio, J., Hernandez, D., Roschelle, J., Brecht, J., Tatar, D., Chaudhury, S., DiGiano, C., & Patton, C. (2007). From socially-mediated to technology-mediated coordination: A study of design tensions using Group Scribbles. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 184-186). New Brunswick, NJ: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
11. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
12. Fishman, B., Marx, R., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 43-76. (Pubitemid 38202850)
13. Goodwin, C., & Duranti, A. (1992). Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 1-42). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
14. Hernández, D., Asensio, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., & Villasclaras, E. D. (2010). Pattern languages for generating CSCL scripts: From a conceptual model to the design of a real situation. In P. Goodyear & S. Retalis (Eds.), E-learning, design patterns and pattern languages (pp. 46-64). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
15. Kennewell, S., Tanner, H., Jones, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2008). Analysing the use of interactive technology to implement interactive teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24 (1), 61-73.
16. Looi, C. K., Chen, W. & Ng, F. (2010). Collaborative activities enabled by Group Scribbles (GS): An exploratory study of learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 54 (1), 14-26.
17. Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(3) 261-290.
18. O'Connor, C., & Michaels, S. (2007). When is dialogue "dialogic"? Human Development, 50, 275-285.
19. Penuel, W. R., & DeBarger, A. H. (2011, April). Supporting teacher learning to improve classroom assessment in science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
20. Penuel, W., Roschelle, J., & Abrahamson, A. (2005). Research on classroom networks for whole-class activities. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (pp. 222-229). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
21. Penuel, W., Fishman, B., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921-958.
22. Penuel, W. R., Beatty, I. D., Remold, J., Harris, C. J., Bienkowski, M., & DeBarger, A. H. (2010). Pedagogical patterns to support interactive formative assessment with classroom response systems. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
23. Prieto, L. P., Villagrá-Sobrino, S., Dimitriadis, Y., Jorrín-Abellán, I., Martínez-Monés, A., Anguita-Martínez, R. (2010). Recurrent routines in the classroom madness: pushing patterns past the design phase. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 499-507). Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University.
24. Roschelle, J., Knudsen, J., & Hegedus, S. (2009). From new technological infrastructures to curricular activity systems: Advanced designs for teaching and learning. In Jacobson, M. J., & Reimann, P. (Eds.). Designs for Learning Environments of the Future: International Perspectives from the Learning Sciences. New York: Springer.
25. Roschelle, J., Tatar, D., Chaudbury, S., Dimitriadis, Y., Patton, C., & DiGiano, C. (2007). Ink, improvisation, and interactive engagement: learning with tablets. IEEE Computer, 40(9), 42-48.
26. Slavin, R.E. & Lake, C. (2008). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78 (3), 427-515.
27. Stake, R. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Villagrá-Sobrino, S., & Prieto, L. P. (2011). The making of a routine catalogue. Valladolid, Spain: University of Valladolid. Available online at http://www.gsic.uva.es/~lprisan/Villagra2011-RoutineAnalysis.pdf
29. Wells, G., & Mejia-Arauz, R. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379-428. (Pubitemid 44212828)
30. Winters, N., & Mor, Y. (2009). Dealing with abstraction: Case study generalisation as a method for eliciting design patterns. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1079-1088.