Disentangling instructional roles: The case of teaching and summative assessment

Studies in Higher Education

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 897-910

  Sasanguie, Delphine ^a   Elen, Jan ^a   Clarebout, Geraldine ^a   van den Noortgate, Wim ^a   Vandenabeele, Joke ^a   de Fraine, Bieke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

accountability; higher education; summative assessment; teacher roles; tutoring

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858389397     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: 1470174X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2010.482206     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F. and Wallace, R. 2003. Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73(3): 277-320.
2. Barrow, M. 2006. Assessment and student transformation: Linking character and intellect. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3): 357-72.
3. Baume, D., Yorke, M. and Coffey, M. 2004. What is happening when we assess, and how can we use our understanding of this to improve assessment?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(4): 451-77.
4. Biggs, J. B. 1979. Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8: 381-94.
5. Biggs, J. 1996. Assessing learning quality: Reconciling institutional, staff and educational demands. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(1): 5-15.
6. Black, P. 1998. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1): 7-74.
7. Bornmann, L., Smittag, S. and Daniel, H. D. 2006. Quality assurance in higher education - Meta-evaluation of multi-stage evaluation procedures in Germany. Higher Education, 52(4): 687-709.
8. Boud, D. 1995. "Assessment and learning: Contradictory or complementary?". In Assessment for learning in higher education, Edited by: Knight, P. 35-48. London: Kogan Page.
9. Brennan, D. J. 2008. University student anonymity in the summative assessment of written work. Higher Education Research and Development, 27(1): 43-54.
10. Butler, R. and Nisan, M. 1986. Effects of no feedback, task-related comments and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Education Psychology, 78: 210-16.
11. Cassady, J. C. 2004. The impact of cognitive test anxiety on text comprehension and recall in the absence of external evaluative pressure. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(3): 311-25.
12. Chetcuti, D., Murphy, P. and Grima, G. 2006. The formative and summative uses of a Professional Development Portfolio: A Maltese case study. Assessment in Education, 13(1): 97-112.
13. De Neve, H. and Janssen, P. J. 1992. Succesvol examineren in het hoger onderwijs, Leuven: Acco.
14. Dochy, F., Gijbels, D. and Segers, M. 2006. "Learning and the emerging new assessment culture". In Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends. Sixteen essays in honour of Erik de Corte, Edited by: Verschaffel, L., Dochy, F., Boekaerts, M. and Vosniadou, S. 191-206. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
15. Eley, M. G. 1992. Differential adoption of study approaches within individual students. Higher Education, 23(3): 231-54.
16. Fong, B. The external examiner approach to assessment. Paper presented at the 2nd National Conference on Assessment in Higher Education. June14-17, Denver, CO.
17. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P. and Borg, W. R. 2007. Educational research. An introduction, 8, Boston, MA: Pearson Education International.
18. Geraedts, C., Boersma, K. T. and Eijkelhof, H. 2006. Towards coherent science and technology education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(3): 307-25.
19. Gipps, C. V. Educational accountability in England: The role of assessment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April21-25, Chicago.
20. Gynnild, V., Myrhaug, D. and Lian, W. 2004. External examiners in new roles: A case study at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Quality in Higher Education, 10(3): 243-52.
21. Hancox, D. and Shaw, J. 2006. A Report on Pharmacy undergraduate research projects: Experiences of the University of Auckland. Pharmacy Education, 6(3): 209-14.
22. Hannan, A. and Silver, H. 2006. On being an external examiner. Studies in Higher Education, 31(1): 57-69.
23. Hoglund, R. 2004. Part II: External evaluation can be helpful. International Journal of Reality Therapy, 24(1): 48
24. Katholieke Hogeschool Leuven. 2007. Onderwijs- en examenreglement 2007-2008. Artikel 101 Examinator [Education and examination regulations 2007-2008. Article 101 Examiner], Chap. 11 http://www.khleuven.be/index.php?page=277&id=11 (accessed September 10, 2008)
25. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. 2008. Algemeen examenreglement. Artikel 25 (examinator) http://www.kuleuven.be/onderwijs/aanbod/info/algemeen/n/06040101.htm (accessed July 2, 2008)
26. Kuhlemeier, J. B., van Weeren, J. and van der Werf, M. P.C. 2006. Scheiding van opleiden en examineren in Nederland en omringende landen. Studie in opdracht van de Onderwijsraad http://www.onderwijsraad.nl/pdfdocs/scheiden_van_opleiden_en_examineren_in_Nederland_en_omringende_landen.pdf (accessed December 15, 2006)
27. Marton, F. and Säljö, R. 1976. On qualitative differences in learning. II - Outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46: 115-27.
28. Nijhuis, J. F.H., Segers, M. S.R. and Gijselaers, W. H. 2005. Influence of redesigning a learning environment on student perceptions and learning strategies. Learning Environments Research, 8(1): 67-93.
29. Popham, W. J. 2001. Teaching to the test?. Educational Leadership, 58(6): 16-20.
30. Posner, D. 2004. What's wrong with teaching to the test?. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(10): 749-51.
31. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. 2004. Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education. Career Education, Information and Guidance Section 4: External examining. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/public/COP/codesofpractice.htm (accessed September 11, 2008)
32. Ramsden, P. 1992. Learning to teach in higher education, London: Routledge.
33. Rees, C. E. and Sheard, C. E. 2004. The reliability of assessment criteria for undergraduate medical students' communication skills portfolios: The Nottingham experience. Medical Education, 38(2): 138-44.
34. Rosenberg, M. 2006. Editorial: On Horace's odes and being a referee. Canadian Journal on Aging, 24(4): 343
35. Sawyer, T. M. 1975. Accountability: Or let others grade your students. College Composition and Communication, 26(4): 335-40.
36. Segers, M., Nijhuis, J. and Gijselaers, W. 2006. Redesigning a learning and assessment environment: The influence on students' perceptions of assessment demands and their learning strategies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(3): 223-42.
37. Standaert, R. 2001. Inspectorates of education in Europe. A critical analysis, Leuven: Acco.
38. Struyven, K., Dochy, F. and Janssens, S. 2005. Students' perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4): 325-41.
39. Subfaculteit Psychologie en Pedagogische Wetenschappen. 2009. Zelfevaluatierapport van de opleiding Bachelor Onderwijskunde ten behoeve van de Externe Onderwijsvisitatie, Kortrijk: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Campus Kortrijk.
40. University of Technology, Sydney. 2007. Understanding student learning http://www.iml.uts.edu.au/learnteach/enhance/understand/ (accessed September 11, 2008)
41. Vidovich, L. 2007. Removing policy from its pedestal: Some theoretical framings and practical possibilities. Educational Review, 59(3): 285-98.
42. Volante, L. 2004. Teaching to the test: What every educator and policy-maker should know. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy,: 35 [Electronic version].http://www.umanitoba.ca/publications/cjeap/articles/volante.html
43. Webb, C., Endacott, R., Gray, M. A., Jasper, M. A., McMullan, M. and Scholes, J. 2003. Evaluating portfolio assessment systems: What are the appropriate criteria?. Nurse Education Today, 23(8): 600-9.
44. Wilson, K. and Fowler, J. 2005. Assessing the impact of learning environments on students' approaches to learning: Comparing conventional and action learning designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1): 87-101.