The sensorimotor contributions to implicit memory, familiarity, and recollection

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 141, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 260-281

  Topolinski, Sascha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Embodiment; Familiarity; Fluency; Recognition; Recollection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECALL; RECOGNITION;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 84858271300     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0025658     Document Type: Article

References (117)

1. Aggleton, J. P., Vann, S. D., Denby, C., Dix, S., Mayes, A. R., Roberts, N., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2005). Sparing of the familiarity component of recognition memory in a patient with hippocampal pathology. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1810-1823. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.01.019
2. Andrade, J. (1996). Investigations of hypesthesia: Using anesthetics to explore relationships between consciousness, learning, and memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 562-580. doi:10.1006/ccog.1996.0033
3. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-609.
4. Beilock, S. L., & Holt, L. E. (2007). Embodied preference judgments: Can likeability be driven by the motor system? Psychological Science, 18, 51-57. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01848.x
5. Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55-68. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.127.1.55
6. Bless, H. (2001). The consequences of mood on the processing of social information. In A. Tesser & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook in social psychology (pp. 391-412). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
7. Bodner, G. E., Masson, M. E. J., & Caldwell, J. I. (2000). Evidence for a generate-recognize model of episodic influences on word-stem completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 267-293. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.267
8. Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265
9. Bornstein, R. F., & D'Agostino, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 545-552. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.545
10. Bowles, B., Crupi, C., Mirsattari, S. M., Pigott, S. E., Parrent, A. G., Pruessner, J. C., Köhler, S. (2007). Impaired familiarity with preserved recollection after anterior temporal-lobe resection that spares the hippocampus. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 16382-16387. doi:10.1073/ pnas.0705273104
11. Brown, M. W., & Aggleton, J. P. (2001). Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 51-61. doi:10.1038/35049064
12. Buchner, A., & Brandt, M. (2003). Further evidence for systematic reliability differences between explicit and implicit memory tests. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 56, 193-209.
13. Buchner, A., & Wippich, W. (2000). On the reliability of implicit and explicit memory measures. Cognitive Psychology, 40, 227-259. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0731
14. Cannon, P. R., Hayes, A. E., & Tipper, S. P. (2010). Sensorimotor fluency influences affect: Evidence from electromyography. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 681-691. doi:10.1080/02699930902927698
15. Challis, B. H., & Brodbeck, D. R. (1992). Level of processing affects priming in word fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 595-607. doi:10.1037/ 0278-7393.18.3.595
16. Cohen, R. L. (1989). Memory for action events: The power of enactment. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 57-80. doi:10.1007/BF01326550
17. Curran, T. (2000). Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 28, 923-938. doi:10.3758/BF03209340
18. Curran, T., Schacter, D. L., & Galluccio, L. (1999). Cross-modal priming and explicit memory in patients with verbal production deficits. Brain and Cognition, 39, 133-146. doi:10.1006/brcg.1998.1063
19. D'Argembeau, A., Lepper, M., & Van der Linden, M. (2008). Embodiment effects in memory for facial identity and facial expression. Cognition & Emotion, 22, 1198-1208. doi:10.1080/02699930701667776
20. de Vries, M., Holland, R. W., Chenier, T., Starr, M. J., & Winkielman, P. (2010). Happiness cools the warm glow of familiarity: Psychophysiological evidence that mood modulates the familiarity-affect link. Psychological Science, 21, 321-328. doi:10.1177/0956797609359878
21. Diana, R. A., Yonelinas, A. P., & Ranganath, C. (2007). Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: A three-component model. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 379-386. doi:10.1016/ j.tics.2007.08.001
22. Dobbins, I. G., Schnyer, D. M., Verfaellie, M., & Schacter, D. L. (2004). Cortical activity reductions during repetition priming can result from rapid response learning. Nature, 428, 316-319. doi:10.1038/ nature02400
23. Downes, J. J., Davis, E., De Mornay-Davies, P., Perfect, T. J., Wilson, K., Mayes, A. R. M., & Sagar, H. (1996). Stem-completion priming in Alzheimer's disease: The importance of target word articulation. Neuropsychologia, 34, 63-75. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(95)00084-4
24. Dunn, J. C. (2004). Remember-know: A matter of confidence. Psychological Review, 111, 524-542. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.524
25. Dunn, J. C. (2008). The dimensionality of the remember-know task: A state-trace analysis. Psychological Review, 115, 426-446. doi:10.1037/ 0033-295X.115.2.426
26. Ellis, H. D., & Lewis, M. B. (2001). Capgras delusion: A window on face recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 149-156. doi:10.1016/ S1364-6613(00)01620-X
27. Ellis, H. D., Young, A. W., Quayle, A. H., & De Pauw, K. W. (1997). Reduced autonomic responses to faces in Capgras delusion. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 264, 1085-1092. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0150
28. Emerson, M. J., & Miyake, A. (2003). The role of inner speech in task switching: A dual-task investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 148-168. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00511-9
29. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1989). Memory for action events: A new field of research. Psychological Research, 51, 153-157. doi:10.1007/ BF00309142
30. Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 16, 309-313. doi:10.3758/BF03197041
31. Gardiner, J. M., Gawlik, B., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1994). Maintenance rehearsal affects knowing not remembering; elaborative rehearsal affects remembering not knowing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 107-110. doi:10.3758/BF03200764
32. Glanzer, M., Kim, K., Hilford, A., & Adams, J. K. (1999). Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 500-513. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.500
33. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1-19.
34. Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 379-401. doi:10.1006/ jmla.2000.2714
35. Graf, P., Shimamura, A. P., & Squire, L. R. (1985). Priming across modalities and priming across category levels: Extending the domain of preserved functioning in amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 386-396. doi:10.1037/02787393.11.2.386
36. Gregg, V. H., & Gardiner, J. M. (1994). Recognition memory and awareness: A large effect of study-test modalities on "know" responses following a highly perceptual orienting task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 131-147. doi:10.1080/09541449408520140
37. Gregory, S. W. (1990). Analysis of fundamental frequency reveals covariation in interview partners' speech. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 237-251. doi:10.1007/BF00989318
38. Haueisen, J., & Knösche, T. R. (2001). Involuntary motor activity in pianists evoked by music perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 786-792. doi:10.1162/08989290152541449
39. Heathcote, A., Raymond, F., & Dunn, J. (2006). Recollection and familiarity in recognition memory: Evidence from ROC curves. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 495-514. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.001
40. Huber, D. E., Clark, T. F., Curran, T., & Winkielman, P. (2008). Effects of repetition priming on recognition memory: Testing a perceptual fluency-disfluency model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1305-1324. doi:10.1037/a0013370
41. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.110.3.306
42. Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., Brown, J., & Jasechko, J. (1989). Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 326-338. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.326
43. Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126-135. doi:10.1037/00963445.118.2.126
44. Jang, Y., Wixted, J. T., & Huber, D. E. (2009). Testing signal-detection models of yes/no and two-alternative forced-choice recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 291-306. doi: 10.1037/a0015525
45. Kelley, C. M., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Remembering mistaken for knowing: Ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 1-24. doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1001
46. Klatzky, R. L., Pellegrino, J. W., McCloskey, B. P., & Doherty, S. (1989). Can you squeeze a tomato? The role of motor representations in semantic sensibility judgments. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 56-77. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(89)90028-4
47. Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (2001). The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 34-53. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.34
48. Lindsay, D. S., & Kelley, C. M. (1996). Creating illusions of familiarity in a cued recall remember/know paradigm. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 197-211.
49. MacLeod, C. M., & Kampe, K. E. (1996). Word frequency effects in recall, recognition, and word fragment completion tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 132-142. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.132
50. MacLeod, C. M., & Masson, M. E. J. (1996). Implicit remembering: The fluency of reprocessing. The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan, 35, 166-171.
51. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.252
52. Masson, M. E. J., Bub, D. N., & Warren, C. M. (2008). Kicking calculators: Contribution of embodied representations to sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 256-265. doi:10.1016/ j.jml.2008.05.003
53. Masson, M. E. J., & MacLeod, C. M. (1996). Contributions of processing fluency to repetition effects in masked word identification. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 9-21. doi:10.1037/11961961.50.1.9
54. McClelland, A. G. R., & Pring, L. (1991). An investigation of crossmodality effects in implicit and explicit memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 43, 19-33.
55. Mickes, L., Wixted, J. T., & Wais, P. (2007). A direct test of the unequal variance signal detection model of recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 858-865. doi:10.3758/BF03194112
56. Mitchell, D. B. (2006). Nonconscious priming after 17 years: Invulnerable implicit memory? Psychological Science, 17, 925-929. doi:10.1111/ j.1467-9280.2006.01805.x
57. Morris, A. L., Cleary, A. M., & Still, M. S. (2008). The role of autonomic arousal in feelings of familiarity. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 1378-1385. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.04.005
58. Niedenthal, P. M., Winkielman, P. Mondillon, L., & Vermeulen, N. (2009). Embodiment of emotional concepts: Evidence from EMG measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1120-1136. doi: 10.1037/a0015574
59. Ochsner, K. N. (2000). Are affective events richly recollected or simply familiar? The experience and process of recognizing feelings past. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 242-261. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.129.2.242
60. Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory & Cognition, 21, 89-102. doi:10.3758/ BF03211168
61. Rajaram, S., & Geraci, L. (2000). Conceptual fluency selectively influences knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1070-1074. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.4.1070
62. Rajaram, S., & Roediger, H. L., III. (1993). Direct comparison of four implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 765-776. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.4.765
63. Ratcliff, R., & Starns, J. J. (2009). Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 116, 59-83. doi: 10.1037/a0014086
64. Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219-235. doi:10.1037/00963445.118.3.219
65. Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 338-342. doi:10.1006/ ccog.1999.0386
66. Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364-382. doi:10.1207/ s15327957pspr0804_3
67. Richardson, J. T. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1975). The effect of articulatory suppression in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 623-629. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80049-1
68. Saltz, E., & Donnenwerth-Nolan, S. (1981). Does motoric imagery facilitate memory for sentences? A selective interference test. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 322-332. doi:10.1016/ S0022-5371(81)90472-2
69. Savage, G. R., Bradley, D. C., & Forster, K. I. (1990). Word frequency and the pronunciation task: The contribution of articulatory fluency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 203-236. doi:10.1080/ 01690969008402105
70. Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501-518. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.501
71. Schacter, D. L., Chiu, C. Y. P., & Ochsner, K. N. (1993). Implicit memory: A selective review. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 16, 159-182. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.001111
72. Schacter, D. L., Dobbins, I. G., & Schnyer, D. M. (2004). Specificity of priming: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 853-862. doi:10.1038/nrn1534
73. Schacter, D. L., & Tulving, E. (1994). What are the memory systems of 1994? In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems (pp. 1-38). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74. Schubert, T., & Semin, G. R. (2009). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1135-1141. doi:10.1002/ejsp.670
75. Schwarz, N. (2002). Feelings as information: Moods influence judgment and processing style. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 534-547). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
76. Seamon, J. G., Williams, P. C., Crowley, M. J., Kim, I. J., Langer, S. A., Orne, P. J., & Wishengrad, D. L. (1995). The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 711-721. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.711
77. Semin, G. R., & Smith, E. R. (Eds.). (2008), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
78. Strack, F., & Förster, J. (1995). Reporting recollective experiences: Direct access to memory systems? Psychological Science, 6, 352-358. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00525.x
79. Strack, F., & Neumann, R. (2000). Furrowing the brow may undermine perceived fame: The role of facial feedback in judgments of celebrity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 762-768. doi:10.1177/ 0146167200269002
80. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
81. Suzuki, M., & Gyoba, J. (2008). Visual and tactile cross-modal mere exposure effects. Cognition & Emotion, 22, 147-154. doi:10.1080/ 02699930701298382
82. Topolinski, S. (2010). Moving the eye of the beholder: Motor components in vision determine aesthetic preference. Psychological Science, 21, 1220-1224. doi:10.1177/0956797610378308
83. Topolinski, S. (2011). I 5683 you: Dialing phone numbers on cell phones activates key-concordant concepts. Psychological Science, 22, 355-360. doi:10.1177/0956797610397668
84. Topolinski, S., & Hertel, G. (2007). The role of personality in psychotherapists' careers. Relationships between personality traits, therapeutic schools, and job satisfaction. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 365-375. doi:10.1080/10503300600830736
85. Topolinski, S., Likowski, K. U., Weyers, P., & Strack, F. (2009). The face of fluency: Semantic coherence automatically elicits a specific pattern of facial muscle reactions. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 260-271. doi: 10.1080/02699930801994112
86. Topolinski, S., & Reber, R. (2010a). Gaining insight into the "Aha" experience. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 402-405. doi:10.1177/0963721410388803
87. Topolinski, S., & Reber, R. (2010b). Immediate truth-Temporal contiguity between a cognitive problem and its solution determines experienced veracity of the solution. Cognition, 114, 117-122. doi:10.1016/ j.cognition.2009.09.009
88. Topolinski, S., & Sparenberg, P. (2011). Turning the hands of time- Clockwise movements increase preference for novelty. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1948550611419266
89. Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009a). The analysis of intuition: Processing fluency and affect in judgments of semantic coherence. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 1465-1503. doi:10.1080/02699930802420745
90. Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009b). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence, and of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 39-63. doi:10.1037/a0014678
91. Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009c). Motormouth: Mere exposure depends on stimulus-specific motor simulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 423-433. doi:10.1037/ a0014504
92. Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009d). Scanning the "fringe" of consciousness: What is felt and what is not felt in intuitions about semantic coherence. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 608-618. doi:10.1016/ j.concog.2008.06.002
93. Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2010). False fame prevented: Avoiding fluency-effects without judgmental correction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 721-733. doi:10.1037/a0019260
94. Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1985). Knowledge without awareness: An autonomic index of facial recognition by prosopagnosics. Science, 228, 1453-1454. doi:10.1126/science.4012303
95. Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(3), 830-846. doi:10.1037/ 0096-1523.24.3.830
96. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 26, 1-12. doi:10.1037/h0080017
97. Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., & Stark, H. A. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 336-342. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.8.4.336
98. Van den Bergh, O., Vrana, S., & Eelen, P. (1990). Letters from the heart: Affective categorization of letter combinations in typists and nontypists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1153-1161. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.6.1153
99. Wagner, A. D., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). On the relationship between familiarity in implicit and explicit memory: Evidence for multiple, distinct familiarity processes. Acta Psychologica, 98, 211-230. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00043-7
100. Wagner, A. D., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Verfaellie, M. (1997). Dissociations between familiarity processes in explicit recognition and implicit perceptual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 305-323. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.2.305
101. Wagner, A. D., Stebbins, G. T., Masciari, F., Fleischman, D. A., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). Neuropsychological dissociation between recognition familiarity and perceptual priming in visual long-term memory. Cortex, 34, 493-511. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70510-0
102. Warrington, E. K., & Weiskrantz, L. (1970). Amnesic syndrome: Consolidation or retrieval? Nature, 228, 628-630. doi:10.1038/228628a0
103. Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1235-1253. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.6.1235
104. Wilson, M. (2001). The case for sensorimotor coding in working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 44-57. doi:10.3758/BF03196138
105. Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation leads to positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 989-1000. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.989
106. Wixted, J. T. (2007). Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 114, 152-176. doi:10.1037/ 0033-295X.114.1.152
107. Wixted, J. T., & Mickes, L. (2010). A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments. Psychological Review, 117, 1025-1054. doi:10.1037/a0020874
108. Yang, S.-J., Gallo, D., & Beilock, S. L. (2009). Embodied memory judgments: A case of motor fluency. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1359-1365. doi:10.1037/ a0016547
109. Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1341-1354. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1341
110. Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 25, 747-763. doi:10.3758/BF03211318
111. Yonelinas, A. P. (1999). The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source memory: An analysis of receiver operating characteristics and a formal model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1415-1434. doi:10.1037/02787393.25.6.1415
112. Yonelinas, A. P. (2001). Consciousness, control, and confidence: The 3 Cs of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 361-379. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.361
113. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517. doi:10.1006/jmla.2002.2864
114. Yonelinas, A. P., Kroll, N. E. A., Dobbins, I. G., Lazzara, M., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Recollection and familiarity deficits in amnesia: Convergence of remember/know, process dissociation, and receiver operating characteristic data. Neuropsychology, 12, 323-339. doi:10.1037/08944105.12.3.323
115. Yonelinas, A. P., Kroll, N. E., Quamme, J. R., Lazzara, M. M., Sauve, M. J., Widaman, K. F., & Knight, R. T. (2002). Effects of extensive temporal lobe damage or mild hypoxia on recollection and familiarity. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1236-1241. doi:10.1038/nn961
116. Yonelinas, A. P., Otten, L. J., Shaw, K. N., & Rugg, M. D. (2005). Separating the brain regions involved in recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 3002-3008. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5295-04.2005
117. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1-27. doi:10.1037/h0025848