I 5683 you: Dialing phone numbers on cell phones activates key-concordant concepts

Psychological Science

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 355-360

  Topolinski, Sascha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

embodiment; implicit memory; motor processes; perceptual motor coordination; semantic memory; word recognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MOBILE PHONE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; READING; RECALL; SEMANTICS; WRITING;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CELLULAR PHONE; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; READING; SEMANTICS; SERIAL LEARNING; VERBAL LEARNING; WRITING;

EID: 79954563467     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797610397668     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abrams, R.L., & Greenwald, A.G. (2000). Parts outweigh the whole (word) in unconscious analysis of meaning. Psychological Science, 11, 118-124.
2. Beilock, S.L., & Holt, L.E. (2007). Embodied preference judgments: Can likeability be driven by the motor system? Psychological Science, 18, 51-57.
3. Beilock, S.L., Lyons, I.M., Mattarella-Micke, A., Nusbaum, H.C., & Small, S.L. (2008). Sports experience changes the neural processing of action language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 13269-13273.
4. Botvinick, M., & Plaut, D.C. (2006). Short-term memory for serial order: A recurrent neural network model. Psychological Review, 113, 201-233.
5. CTIA-The Wireless Association. (2010). CTIA semi-annual wireless industry survey. Retrieved from http://www.ctia.org/advocacy/research/index.cfm/AID/10316.
6. Glenberg, A.M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 20, 1-55.
7. Hoffmann, J., Sebald, A., & Stöcker, C. (2001). Irrelevant response effects improve serial learning in SRT tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 470-482.
8. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494-500.
9. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849-937.
10. International Telecommunication Union. (2001). ITU-T Recommendation E.161: Arrangement of digits, letters and symbols on telephones and other devices that can be used for gaining access to a telephone network. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
11. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Dover.
12. Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2004). Variable action effects: Response control by context-specific effect anticipations. Psychological Research, 68, 155-162.
13. Körding, K.P., & Wolpert, D.M. (2004). Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature, 427, 244-247.
14. Kunde, W., Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2004). Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation and execution of actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 87-106.
15. Mussweiler, T. (2006). Doing is for thinking! Stereotype activation by stereotypic movements. Psychological Science, 17, 17-21.
16. Perea, M., Rosa, E., & Gómez, C. (2002). Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task? Memory & Cognition, 30, 34-45.
17. Rieger, M. (2007). Letters as visual action-effects in skilled typing. Acta Psychologica, 126, 138-153.
18. Sadato, N., Pascual-Leone, A., Grafman, J., Ibañez, V., Deiber, M.P., Dold, G., & Hallett, M. (1996). Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects. Nature, 380, 526-528.
19. Schubert, T.W. (2004). The power in your hand: Gender differences in bodily feedback from making a fist. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 757-769.
20. Stöcker, C., Sebald, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2003). The influence of response effect compatibility in a serial reaction time task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 685-703.
21. Strack, F., Martin, L.L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 768-777.
22. Topolinski, S. (2010). Moving the eye of the beholder: Motor components in vision determine aesthetic preference. Psychological Science, 21, 1220-1224.
23. Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009). Motormouth: Mere exposure depends on stimulus-specific motor simulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 423-433.
24. Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2010). False fame prevented: Avoiding fluency effects without judgmental correction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 721-733.
25. Umiltà, M.A., Escola, L., Intskirveli, I., Grammont, F., Rochat, M., Caruana, F.,et al.(2008). When pliers become fingers in the monkey motor system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 2209-2213.
26. Van den Bergh, O., Vrana, S., & Eelen, P. (1990). Letters from the heart: Affective categorization of letter combinations in typists and nontypists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1153-1161.