Gaining insight into the "Aha" experience

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 402-405

  Topolinski, Sascha ^a   Reber, Rolf ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

affect; confidence; insight; judged truth; processing fluency; surprise

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650334297     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: 14678721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963721410388803     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2009). (See References). A recent review of the neuroscience of insight.
2. Oppenheimer, D.M. (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 237-241. A succinct and up-to-date review of the pervasive influence of processing fluency in a broad range of judgments.
3. Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). (See References). A review about the interplay between cognition, fluency, and affect.
4. Benjamin, A.S., Bjork, R.A., & Schwartz, B.L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55-68.
5. Gick, M.L., & Lockhart, R.S. (1995). Cognitive and affective components of insight. In R.J. Sternberg & J.E. Davidson (Eds.), The Nature of insight. (pp. 197-228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Gruber, H.E. (1995). Insight and affect in the history of science. In R.J. Sternberg & J.E. Davidson (Eds.), The Nature of Insight. (pp. 397-431). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Hansen, J., Dechêne, A., & Wänke, M. (2008). Discrepant fluency increases subjective truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 687-691.
8. Kelley, C.M. & Lindsay, D.S. (1993). Remembering mistaken for knowing: Ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 1-24.
9. Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (2001). The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 34-53.
10. Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2009). Aha! The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 210-216.
11. Metcalfe, J. & Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 15, 238-246.
12. Persaud, N., McLeod, P., & Cowey, A. (2007). Post-decision wagering objectively measures awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 257-261.
13. Poincaré, H. (1996). Science and Method. London, England: Routledge/Thoemess Press; (Original work published 1913).
14. Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 338-342.
15. Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364-382.
16. Rhodes, M.G., & Castel, A.D. (2008). Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: Evidence for metacognitive illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 615-625.
17. Topolinski, S., Likowski, K.U., Weyers, P., & Strack, F. (2009). The face of fluency: Semantic coherence automatically elicits a specific pattern of facial muscle reactions. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 260-271.
18. Topolinski, S., & Reber, R. (2010). Immediate truth: Temporal contiguity between a cognitive problem and its solution determines experienced veracity of the solution. Cognition, 114, 117-122.
19. Topolinski, S. & Strack, F. (2009a). Scanning the "fringe" of consciousness: What is felt and what is not felt in intuitions about semantic coherence. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 608-618.
20. Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009b). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence, and of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 39-63.
21. Unkelbach, C. (2007). Reversing the truth effect: Learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 219-230.
22. Whittlesea, B.W.A., & Williams, L.D. (1998). Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity. Acta Psychologica, 98, 141-165.
23. Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J.T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation leads to positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 989-1000.