Biomechanical analysis of the effects of implant diameter and bone quality in short implants placed in the atrophic posterior maxilla

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 153-160

  Chang, Shih Hao ^a,b   Lin, Chun Li ^c   Hsue, Shue Sang ^d   Lin, Yang Sung ^b   Huang, Shiang Rung ^b  

^a CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Bone quality; Finite element analysis; Implant diameter; Short implant

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; BIOMECHANICAL BEHAVIOR; BONE QUALITY; CAD SYSTEM; CT IMAGE; FE MODEL; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; IMPLANT STRESS; LATERAL LOADS; MECHANICAL TRANSMISSION; OCCLUSAL FORCES; OSTEOPOROTIC; SCHEME DESIGN; SIMULATED RESULTS; SURGICAL RISKS; VERTICAL LOAD; VON MISES; VON MISES STRESS;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL PROSTHESES; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; LOADS (FORCES); STRAIN;

IMPLANTS (SURGICAL);

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE; BONE ATROPHY; BONE DENSITY; BONE QUALITY; BONE STRESS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMPLANT; IMPLANT DIAMETER; MALE; MAXILLA; OSTEOPOROSIS; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT DENTAL IMPLANT; SIMULATION; VALIDATED FINITE ELEMENT MODEL; VON MISES STRESS;

ATROPHY; BIOMECHANICS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MALE; MAXILLA; MECHANICAL PROCESSES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 84856956589     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: 18734030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Esposito M., Grusovin M.G., Felice P., Karatzopoulos G., Worthington H.V., Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009, 4:CD003607.
2. Winkler S., Morris H.F., Ochi S. Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann Thorac Surg 2000, 5:22-31.
3. Bahat O. Branemark system implants in the posterior maxilla: clinical study of 660 implants followed for 5-12 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000, 15:646-653.
4. Nedir R., Bischof M., Briaux J.M., Beyer S., Szmukler-Moncler S., Bernard J.P. A 7-year life table analysis from a prospective study on ITI implants with special emphasis on the use of short implants. Results from a private practice. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004, 15:150-157.
5. Kotsovilis S., Fourmousis I., Karoussis I.K., Bamia C. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of implant length on the survival of rough-surface dental implants. J Periodontol 2009, 80:1700-1718.
6. Misch C.E., Steignga J., Barboza E., Misch-Dietsh F., Cianciola L.J., Kazor C. Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: a multicenter retrospective 6-year case series study. J Periodontol 2006, 77:1340-1347.
7. Degidi M., Piattelli A., Felice P., Carinci F. Immediate functional loading of edentulous maxilla: a 5-year retrospective study of 388 titanium implants. J Periodontol 2005, 76:1016-1024.
8. Ivanoff C.J., Grondahl K., Sennerby L., Bergstrom C., Lekholm U. Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999, 14:173-180.
9. Li W., Chow J., Hui E., Lee P.K., Chow R. Retrospective study on immediate functional loading of edentulous maxillas and mandibles with 690 implants, up to 71 months of follow-up. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009, 67:2653-2662.
10. Tawil G., Younan R. Clinical evaluation of short, machined-surface implants followed for 12-92 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003, 18:894-901.
11. Degidi M., Piattelli A., Iezzi G., Carinci F. Wide-diameter implants: analysis of clinical outcome of 304 fixtures. J Periodontol 2007, 78:52-58.
12. Deporter D.A., Todescan R., Watson P.A., Pharoah M., Pilliar R.M., Tomlinson G. A prospective human clinical trial of endopore dental implants in restoring the partially edentulous maxilla using fixed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001, 16:527-536.
13. Degidi M., Piattelli A., Iezzi G., Carinci F. Retrospective study of 200 immediately loaded implants retaining 50 mandibular overdentures. Quintessence Int 2007, 38:281-288.
14. Turkyilmaz I., Aksoy U., McGlumphy E.A. Two alternative surgical techniques for enhancing primary implant stability in the posterior maxilla: a clinical study including bone density, insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis data. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008, 10:231-237.
15. Van Oosterwyck H., Duyck J., Vander Sloten J., Van der Perre G., de Cooman M., Lievens S., et al. The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone healing loading around oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998, 9:407-418.
16. Guan H., van Staden R., Loo Y.C., Johnson N., Ivanovski S., Meredith N. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009, 24:866-876.
17. Petrie C.S., Williams J.L. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005, 16:486-494.
18. Pierrisnard L., Renouard F., Renault P., Barquins M. Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003, 5:254-262.
19. Zix J., Hug S., Kessler-Liechti G., Mericske-Stern R. Measurement of dental implant stability by resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment: comparison of both techniques in a clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008, 23:525-530.
20. Farzad P., Andersson L., Gunnarsson S., Sharma P. Implant stability, tissue conditions, and patient self-evaluation after treatment with osseointegrated implants in the posterior mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004, 6:24-32.
21. Akca K., Cehreli M.C., Iplikcioglu H. Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant-abutment complex of a reduced-diameter morse-taper implant. A nonlinear finite element stress analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003, 14:444-454.
22. Lekholm U., Zarb G.A. Patient selection and preparation. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Quintessence Int 1985, 199-209. P.I. Branemark, G.A. Zarb, T. Albrektsson (Eds.).
23. Lin C.L., Wang J.C., Kuo Y.C. Numerical simulation on the biomechanical interactions of tooth/implant-supported system under various occlusal forces with rigid/non-rigid connections. J Biomech 2006, 39:453-463.
24. Holmes D.C., Loftus J.T. Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1997, 23:104-111.
25. Benzing U.R., Gall H., Weber H. Biomechanical aspects of two different implant-prosthetic concepts for edentulous maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995, 10:188-198.
26. Huang H.L., Fuh L.J., Ko C.C., Hsu J.T., Chen C.C. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009, 24:455-462.
27. Pjetursson B.E., Tan K., Lang N.P., Bragger U., Egger M., Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004, 15:625-642.
28. Lin D., Li Q., Li W., Swain M. Dental implant induced bone remodeling and associated algorithms. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2009, 2:410-432.
29. Sahin S., Cehreli M.C., Yalcin E. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses - a review. J Dent 2002, 30:271-282.
30. Huang H.L., Huang J.S., Ko C.C., Hsu J.T., Chang C.H., Chen M.Y. Effects of splinted prosthesis supported a wide implant or two implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005, 16:466-472.
31. Lin C.L., Lin Y.H., Chang S.H. Multi-factorial analysis of variables influencing the bone loss of an implant placed in the maxilla: prediction using FEA and SED bone remodeling algorithm. J Biomech 2010, 43:644-651.
32. Cehreli M., Sahin S., Akca K. Role of mechanical environment and implant design on bone tissue differentiation: current knowledge and future contexts. J Dent 2004, 32:123-132.
33. Frost H.M. Wolff's Law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod 1994, 64:175-188.
34. Rubin C.T., Lanyon L.E. Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude. Calcif Tissue Int 1985, 37:411-417.
35. Boresi A., Schmidt R., Sidebottom O., Boresi A.P., Schmidt R.J., Sidebottom O.M. Inelastic material behavior. Advanced mechanics of materials 1993, John Wiley, NY, p. 136, Chapter 4.
36. Lin C.L., Chang S.H., Chang W.J., Kuo Y.C. Factorial analysis of variables influencing mechanical characteristics of a single tooth implant placed in the maxilla using finite element analysis and the statistics-based Taguchi method. Eur J Oral Sci 2007, 115:408-416.
37. Ding X., Liao S.H., Zhu X.H., Zhang X.H., Zhang L. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009, 11:279-287.
38. Ding X., Zhu X.H., Liao S.H., Zhang X.H., Chen H. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthodont 2009, 18:393-402.
39. Brink J., Meraw S.J., Sarment D.P. Influence of implant diameter on surrounding bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007, 18:563-568.
40. Kong L., Gu Z., Li T., Wu J., Hu K., Liu Y., et al. Biomechanical optimization of implant diameter and length for immediate loading: a nonlinear finite element analysis. Int J Prosthodont 2009, 22:607-615.
41. Bozkaya D., Muftu S. Mechanics of the taper integrated screwed-in (TIS) abutments used in dental implants. J Biomech 2005, 38:87-97.
42. Beer F.P., Johnston E.R. Mechanics of materials 1992, McGraw-Hill, Inc., NY.