Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 279-287

  Ding, Xi ^a   Liao, Sheng Hui ^b   Zhu, Xing Hao ^a   Zhang, Xiu Hua ^a   Zhang, Lin ^a  

^a WENZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Automatic mesh generator; Biomechanics; Complete range mandible; Dental implant; Diameter; Finite element analyses; Immediate loading; Length; Stress

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; TITANIUM;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FRICTION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; JAW; MANDIBLE; MASTICATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH ARCH; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; YOUNG MODULUS;

ALGORITHMS; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; BIOMECHANICS; BITE FORCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; ELASTIC MODULUS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FRICTION; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 70449381091     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00124.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bozkaya D, Muftu S, Muftu A. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2004 92 : 523 530.
2. Cruz M, Wassall T, Toledo EM, Barra LP, Lemonge AC. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003 18 : 675 684.
3. Meijer HJ, Kuiper JH, Starmans FJ, Bosman F. Stress distribution around dental implants: influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1992 68 : 96 102.
4. Clelland NL, Ismail YH, Zaki HS, Pipko D. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis in and around the screw-vent implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991 6 : 391 398.
5. Stegaroiu R, Sato T, Kusakari H, Miyakawa O. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998 13 : 82 90. (Pubitemid 128505830)
6. Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996 7 : 143 152.
7. Callan DP, O'Mahony A, Cobb CM. Loss of crestal bone around dental implants: a retrospective study. Implant Dent 1998 7 : 258 265.
8. Brunski JB. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface. Adv Dent Res 1999 13 : 99 119.
9. Palmer RM, Smith BJ, Palmer PJ, Floyd PD. A prospective study of Astra single tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997 8 : 173 179.
10. Holmgren EP, Seckinger RJ, Kilgren LM, Mante F. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis - a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J Oral Implantol 1998 24 : 80 88.
11. Chun HJ, Cheong SY, Han JH, et al. Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil 2002 29 : 565 574.
12. Tada S, Stegaroiu R, Kitamura E, Miyakawa O, Kusakari H. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003 18 : 357 368.
13. Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001 85 : 585 598.
14. Mellal A, Wiskott HW, Botsis J, Scherrer SS, Belser UC. Stimulating effect of implant loading on surrounding bone. Comparison of three numerical models and validation by in vivo data. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004 15 : 239 248.
15. Van Zyl PP, Grundling NL, Jooste CH, Terblanche E. Three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible incorporating six osseointegrated implants for stress analysis of mandibular cantilever prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995 10 : 51 57.
16. Akca K, Iplikcioglu H. Evaluation of the effects of the residual bone angulation on implant-supported fixed prosthesis in mandibular posterior edentulism. Part II. 3D finite element stress analysis. Implant Dent 2001 10 : 238 243.
17. Iplikcioglu H, Akca K. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone. J Dent 2002 30 : 41 46.
18. Ciftci Y, Canay S. The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000 15 : 571 582.
19. Yokoyama S, Wakabayashi N, Shiota M, Ohyama T. The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2004 91 : 234 240.
20. Akca K, Iplikcioglu H. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001 16 : 722 730.
21. Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne SC, Felton DA. 3D-FEA of osseointegration percentages and patterns on implant-bone interfacial stresses. J Dent 1997 25 : 485 491.
22. Barbier L, Vander Sloten J, Krzesinski G, Schepers E, Van der Perre G. Finite element analysis of non-axial versus axial loading of oral implants in the mandible of the dog. J Oral Rehabil 1998 25 : 847 458.
23. Holmes DC, Loftus JT. Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants. J Oral Implantol 1997 23 : 104 111.
24. Ivanoff CJ, Grondahl K, Sennerby L, Bergstrom C, Lekholm U. Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999 14 : 173 180.
25. Winkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S. Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann Periodontol 2000 5 : 22 31.
26. Davarpanah M, Martines H, Kebir M, Etienne D, Tecucianu JF. Wide-diameter implants: new concepts. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 2001 21 : 149 159.
27. Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Johansson C, Rangert B, Lekholm U. Influence of implant diameters on the integration of screw implants. An experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997 26 : 141 148.
28. Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Implant prosthodontic management of partially edentulous patients missing posterior teeth: the Toronto experience. J Prosthet Dent 2003 89 : 352 359.
29. Petrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005 16 : 486 494.
30. Wyatt CC, Zarb GA. Treatment outcomes of patients with implant-supported fixed partial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998 13 : 204 211.
31. Eckert SE, Koka S, Wolfinger G, Choi YG. Survey of implant experience by prosthodontist in the United States. J Prosthodont 2002 11 : 194 201.
32. Douglass GL, Merrin RL. The immediate dental implant. J Calif Dent Assoc 2002 30 : 362 365.
33. Lum LB. A biomechanical rationale for the use of short implants. J Oral Implantol 1991 17 : 126 131.
34. Brunski JB. Biomechanics of oral implants: future research directions. J Dent Educ 1988 52 : 775 787.
35. Rieger MR, Mayberry M, Brose MO. Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990 63 : 671 676.