Influence of Implant Length and Bicortical Anchorage on Implant Stress Distribution

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 254-262

  Pierrisnard, Laurent ^a,b   Renouard, Franck ^b   Renault, Patrick ^a   Barquins, Michel ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b Ecl Sup de Phys Chim Indust ^*  (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Bicortical anchorage; Bone stress; Finite element analysis; Implant length; Implant stress

Indexed keywords

GOLD; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BONE; BONE STRESS; BONE STRUCTURE; CANCELLOUS BONE; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; CORTICAL BONE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; IMPLANT; MECHANICAL STRESS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STRESS; THEORETICAL STUDY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

EID: 1342302781     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00208.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Brånemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 6:142-146.
2. van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, et al. Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5:272-281.
3. ten Bruggenkate CM, Asikainen P, Foitzik C, Krekeler G, Sutter F. Short (6-mm) nonsubmerged dental implants: result of a multicenter trial of 1 to 7 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13:791-798.
4. Friberg B, Gröndhal K, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI. Long-term follow-up of severely atrophic edentulous mandibles reconstructed with short Brånemark implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 3:183-189.
5. Brunski JB. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface. Clin Mater 1992; 10:153-201.
6. Brunski JB. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface. Adv Dent Res 1999; 13:99-119.
7. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. Part I: Success criteria and epidemiology. Part II: Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106:527-551, 721-764.
8. Rangert B, Krogh PHJ, Langer B, et al. Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10:326-334.
9. Carter DR, Spengler DM. Mechanical properties of cortical bone. Clin Orthop 1978; 135:192-217.
10. Meijer HJA, Kuiper JH, Starmans FJM, et al. Stress distribution around dental implants: influence of superstructure, length of implant and height of mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68:96-102.
11. Nishihara K, Nakagiri S. Biomechanical studies on newly tailored artificial dental root. Biomed Mater Eng 1994; 4:141-149.
12. Hedia HS. Stress and strain distribution behavior in the bone due to the effect of cancellous bone, dental implant material and the bone height. Biomed Mater Eng 2002; 12:111-119.
13. van Oosterwyck HV, Duyck J, Sloten JV, et al. The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9:407-418.
14. Rangert B. Mechanical and biomechanical guidelines for the use of Brånemark system - general principles. Aust Prosthodont J 1993; 7(Suppl):39-44.
15. Rangert B. Mechanical and biomechanical guidelines for the use of Brånemark system - general principles. Aust Prosthodont J 1993; 7(Suppl):45-49.
16. Pierrisnard L, Augereau D, Barquins M. Analyse comparative par la méthode des éléments finis des contraintes osseuses induites par des implants de géométrie variée. 2ème partie: influence relative de la longueur et de l'orientation des implants. Implants 2000; 6:93-105.
17. Iplikcioglu H, Akca K. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone. J Dent 2002; 30:41-46.
18. Ivanoff CJ, Grondahl K, Bergstrom C, et al. Influence of bicortical or monocortical anchorage on maxillary implant stability: a 15-year retrospective study of Brånemark System implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15:103-110.
19. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, et al. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5:347-359.
20. Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. Influence of monocortical and bicortical anchorage on the integration of titanium implants. A study in the rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 26:141-148.
21. Morgan MJ, James DF, Pillar R. Fracture of the fixture components of an osseointegrated implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 28:1103-1109.
22. Natali AN, Pavan PG. A comparative analysis based on different strength criteria for evaluation of risk factor for dental implants. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2002; 5:127-133.
23. Renouard F, Rangert B. Risk factors in implant dentistry: simplified clinical analysis for predictable treatment. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence Publishing, 1999.