Role of mechanical environment and implant design on bone tissue differentiation: Current knowledge and future contexts

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 123-132

  Çehreli, Murat ^a,b   Şahin, Saime ^a   Akça, Kivanç ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Bone; Bone adaptation; Dynamic loading; Implant design; Strain

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REGENERATION; BONE TISSUE; ENVIRONMENT; HEALING; MEDLINE; TISSUE DIFFERENTIATION; TISSUE REACTION; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

EID: 1642471942     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2003.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Åstrand P., Engquist B., Dahlgren S., Engquist E., Feldmann H., Grondahl K. Astra Tech and Brånemark System implants: a prospective 5-year comparative study. Results after one year. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 1:1999;17-26.
2. van Steenberghe D., De Mars G., Quirynen M., Jacobs R., Naert I. A prospective split-mouth comparative study of two screw-shaped self-tapping pure titanium implant systems. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 11:2000;202-209.
3. Moberg L.E., Kondell P.A., Sagulin G.B., Bolin A., Heimdahl A., Gynther G.W. Brånemark system and ITI dental implant system for treatment of mandibular edentulism. A comparative randomized study: 3-year follow-up. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 12:2001;450-461.
4. Frost H.M. Wolff's law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthodontics. 64:1994;175-188.
5. Sykaras N., Iacopino A.M., Marker V.A., Triplett R.G., Woody R.D. Implant materials, designs and surface topographies: their effect on osseointegration. A literature review. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 15:2000;675-690.
6. Wiskott H.W.A., Belser U.C. Lack of integration of smooth titanium surfaces: a working hypothesis based on strains generated in the surrounding bone. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 10:1999;429-444.
7. Frost H.M. A determinant of bone architecture. The minimum effective strain. Clinical Orthopaedics. 175:1983;286-292.
8. Frost H.M. Bone 'mass' and the 'mechanostat' a proposal. Anatomical Records. 219:1987;1-9.
9. Frost H.M. A new direction for osteoporosis research: a review and proposal. Bone. 12:1991;429-437.
10. Frost H.M. Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 1. Redefining Wolff's law: the bone modelling problem. Anatomical Records. 226:1990;403-413.
11. Frost H.M., Turner C.H. Letter to the editor. Toward a mathematical description of bone biology: the principle of cellular accomodation. Calcified Tissue International. 67:2000;184-187.
12. Turner C.H. Toward a mathematical description of bone biology: the principle of cellular accomodation. Calcified Tissue International. 65:1999;466-471.
13. Carter D.R., Orr T.E., Fyhrie D.P., Schurman D.J. Influences of mechanical stress on prenatal and postnatal skeletal development. Clinical Orthopaedics. 238:1987;237-250.
14. Carter D.R. Mechanical history and skeletal biology. Journal of Biomechanics. 20:1987;1095-1109.
15. Carter D.R., Beaupré G.S., Giori N.J., Helms J.A. Mechanobiology of skeletal regeneration. Clinical Orthopaedics. 355S:1998;S41-S55.
16. Cehreli M.C., Iplikcioglu H., Bilir O.G. The influence of the location of the load transfer on strain around implants supporting four unit cement-retained prostheses: in vitro evaluation of axial versus off-set loading. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 29:2002;394-400.
17. Akca K., Cehreli M.C., Iplikcioglu H. A comparison of 3-dimensional finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain-gauge measurements on dental implants. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 15:2002;115-121.
18. Duyck J., Rønold H.J., van Oosterwyck H., Naert I., Vander Sloten J., Ellingsen J.E. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 12:2001;207-218.
19. Esposito M., Worthington H.V., Coulthard P. In search of truth: the role of systematic reviews and meta-analyses for assessing the effectiveness of rehabilitation with oral implants. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 3:2001;62-78.
20. Sahin S., Cehreli M.C., Yalcin E. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses - a review. Journal of Dentistry. 30:2002;271-282.
21. Esposito M., Hirsch J.-M., Lekholm U., Thompsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants (II) Etiopathogenesis. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 106:1998;721-764.
22. Wolff J. Das gesetz der transformation der knochen. 1892;A Hirschwald, Berlin.
23. Bertram J.E., Swartz S.M. The 'Law of bone transformation': a case of crying Wolff? Biological Reviews of Cambridge Philosophical Society. 66:1991;245-273.
24. Rubin C.T., Lanyon L.E. Dynamic strain similarity in vertebrates; an alternative to alometric limb bone scaling. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 107:1984;321-327.
25. Rubin C.T., Lanyon L.E. Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 66-A:1984;397-402.
26. Simmons D.J., Russell J.E., Winter F., TranVan P., Vignery A., Baron R., Rosenberg G.D., Walker W.V. Effect of spaceflight on the non-weight-bearing bones of rat skeleton. American Journal of Physiology. 244R:1983;319-326.
27. O'Connor J.A., Lanyon L.E., MacFie H.M. The influence of strain rate on adaptive bone remodelling. Journal of Biomechanics. 15:1982;767-781.
28. Rubin C.T., McLeod K.J. Promotion of bony ingrowth by frequency-specific, low amplitude mechanical strain. Clinical Orthopaedics. 298:1994;165-174.
29. Turner C.H. Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli. Bone. 23:1998;399-407.
30. Hillam R.A., Skerry T.M. Inhibition of bone resorption and stimulation of formation by mechanical loading of the modeling rat ulna in vivo. Journal of Bone Mineral Research. 10:1995;683-689.
31. Rubin C.T., Lanyon L.E. Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude. Calcified Tissue International. 37:1985;411-417.
32. Rubin C., Turner A.S., Bain S., Mallinckrodt C., McLeod K. Anabolism. Low mechanical signals strengthen long bones. Nature. 412:2001;603-604.
33. Rubin C., Turner A.S., Mallinckrodt C., Jerome C., McLeod K., Bain S. Mechanical strain, induced noninvasively in the high-frequency domain, is anabolic to cancellous bone, but not cortical bone. Bone. 30:2002;445-452.
34. Oxlund B.S., Ørtoft G., Andreassen T.T., Oxlund H. Low-intensity, high-frequency vibration appears to prevent the decrease in strength of the femur and tibia associated with ovariectomy of adult rats. Bone. 32:2003;69-77.
35. Liu Z.J., Herring S.W. Bone surface strains and internal bony pressures at the jaw joint of the miniature pig during masticatory muscle contraction. Archives of Oral Biology. 45:2000;95-112.
36. Melsen B., Lang N.P. Biological reactions of alveolar bone to orthodontic loading of oral implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 12:2001;144-152.
37. Brånemark R. A biomechanical study of osseointegration. In-vivo measurements in rat, rabbit, dog and man. Thesis. University of Göteborg; 1996.
38. Bobyn J.D., Mortimer E.S., Glassman A.H., Engh C.A., Miller J.E., Brooks C.E. Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Clinical Orthopaedics. 274:1992;79-96.
39. Huiskes R., Weinans H., Van Rietbergen B. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clinical Orthopaedics. 274:1992;124-134.
40. Kasemo B., Lausma J. Biomaterial and implant surfaces: a surface science approach. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 3:1988;247-259.
41. Siegele D., Soltesz U. Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 4:1989;333-340.
42. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T., Andersson B. Design and surface characteristics of 3 commercially available oral implant systems. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 8:1993;622-633.
43. Nishihara K., Nakamura M., Nakagiri S. Biomechanical studies on shape effect of hydroxyapatite artificial root upon surrounding jawbone. Clinical Materials. 16:1994;127-135.
44. Vander Sloten J., Labey L., van Audekercke R., Van der Perre G. Materials and design for orthopaedic implants with improved long-term performance. Biomaterials. 19:1998;1455-1459.
45. Joos U., Vollmer D., Kleinheinz J. Effect of implant geometry on strain distribution in peri-implant bone. Mund Kiefer und Gesichtschirurgie. 4:2000;143-147.
46. Rieger M.R., Mayberry M., Brose M.O. Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 63:1990;671-676.
47. Rieger M.R., Adams W.K., Kinzel G.L. A finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 63:1990;457-465.
48. Kinni M.E., Hokama S.N., Caputo A.A. Force transfer by osseointegrated implant devices. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2:1987;11-14.
49. McGlumphy E.A., Campagni W.V., Peterson E.J. A comparison of the stress transfer characteristics of a dental implant with a rigid or a resilient internal element. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 62:1989;586-593.
50. van Rossen L.P., Braak L.H., de Putter C., de Groot K. Stress-absorbing elements in dental implants. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 64:1990;198-205.
51. Möllersten L., Lockowandt P., Linden L.-A. Comparison of strength and failure mode of seven implant systems: an in vitro test. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 78:1997;582-591.
52. Norton M.R. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint design. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 8:1997;290-298.
53. Norton M.R. In vitro evaluation of the strength of the conical implant-to-abutment joint in two commercially available implant systems. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 83:2000;567-571.
54. Merz B.R., Hunenbart S., Belser U.C. Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 15:2000;519-526.
55. Burguete R.L., Johns R.B., King T., Patterson E.A. Tightening characteristics for screwed joints in osseointegrated dental implants. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 71:1994;592-599.
56. Goodacre C.J., Kan J.Y.K., Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 81:1999;537-552.
57. Arvidson K., Bystedt H., Frykholm A., von Konow L., Lothigius E. Five-year prospective follow-up of the Astra Tech Dental Implant System in the treatment of edentulous mandibles. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 9:1998;225-234.
58. Norton M.R. Biologic and mechanical stability of single-tooth implants: 4- to 7-year follow-up. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 4:2001;214-220.
59. Nordin T., Jönsson G., Nelvig P., Rasmusson L. The use of a conical fixture design for fixed partial prostheses. A preliminary report. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 9:1998;343-347.
60. Schwarz M.S. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 11:(Suppl 1):2000;156-158.
61. Rangert B., Krogh P.H.J., Langer B., Van Roekel N.B. Bending overload and implant fracture. A retrospective clinical analysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 10:1995;326-334.
62. Buser D., Mericske-Stern R., Bernard J., Behneke A., Behneke N., Hirt H., Belser U.C., Lang N. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multicenter study with 2,359 implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 8:1997;161-172.
63. Buser D., Mericske-Stern R., Dula K., Lang N. Clinical experience with one-stage, non-submerged dental implants. Advances in Dental Research. 13:1999;153-161.
64. Moberg L.E., Kondell P.A., Kullman L., Heimdahl A., Gynther G.W. Evaluation of single-tooth restorations on ITI dental implants. A prospective study of 29 patients. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 10:1999;45-53.
65. Hansson S. Implant-abutment interface: biomechanical study of flat top versus conical. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2:2000;33-41.
66. Mihalko W.M., May T.C., Kay J.F., Krause W.R. Finite element analysis of interface geometry effects on the crestal bone surrounding a dental implant. Implant Dentistry. 1:1992;212-217.
67. Akca K., Cehreli M.C., Iplikcioglu H. Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of a reduced-diameter morse-taper implant: a non-linear finite element stress analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 14:2003;444-455.
68. Pilliar R.M., Deporter D.A., Watson P.A., Valiquette N. Dental implant design - effect on bone remodelling. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 25:1991;467-483.
69. Bahat O. Branemark system implants in the posterior maxilla: clinical study of 660 implants followed for 5 to 12 years. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 15:2000;646-653.
70. Quirynen M., Naert I., van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success of the Brånemark system®. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 3:1992;104-111.
71. Malevez C.H., Hermans M., Daelemans P.H. Marginal bone levels at Branemark system implants used for single tooth restoration. The influence of implant design and anatomical region. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 7:1996;162-169.
72. Hansson S. The implant neck: smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 10:1999;394-405.
73. Palmer R.M., Smith B.J., Palmer P.J., Floyd P.D. A prospective study of Astra single tooth implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 8:1997;173-179.
74. Karlsson U., Gotfredsen K., Olsson C. A 2-year report on maxillary and mandibular fixed partial dentures supported by Astra Tech dental implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 9:1998;235-242.
75. 2-blasted surface. Journal of Prosthodontics. 10:2001;2-7.
76. Listgarten M.A. Soft and hard tissue response to endosseous dental implants. Anatomical Records. 245:1996;410-425.
77. Esposito M., Worthington H.V., Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants. (Cochrane review). In: The Cochrane library, Issue 1. 2003;Update Software, Oxford.
78. Bowers K.T., Keller J.C., Randolph B.A., Wick D.G., Michaels C.M. Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast response in vitro. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 7:1992;302-310.
79. Steflik D.E., Noel C., McBrayer C., Lake F.T., Parr G.R., Sisk A.L., Hanes P.J. Histologic observations of bone remodelling adjacent to endosteal dental implants. Journal of Oral Implantology. 26:1995;96-106.
80. Buser D., Schenk R.K., Steinemann S., Fiorellini J.P., Fox C.H., Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 25:1991;889-902.
81. 2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: an experimental study with rabbits. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 29:1995;1223-1231.
82. Cochran D.L., Schenk R.K., Lussi A., Higginbottom F.L., Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandlasted and acid-etched surface: a histometric study in the canine mandible. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 40:1998;1-11.
83. Carr A.B., Larsen P.E., Gerard D.A. Histomorphometric comparison of implant anchorage for two types of dental implants after 3 and 6 months' healing in baboon jaws. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 85:2001;276-280.
84. Buser D., Nydegger T., Hirt H.P., Cochran D.L., Nolte L.-P. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 13:1998;611-619.
85. Deporter D.A., Friedland B., Watson P.A., Pilliar R.M., Howley T.P., Abdulla D., Melcher A.H., Smith D.C. A clinical and radiographic assessment of a porous surfaced titanium alloy dental implant system in dogs. Journal of Dental Research. 65:1986;1071-1077.
86. Quirynen M., Marechal M., Busscher H.J., Weerkamp A.H., Dairus P.L., van Steenberghe D. The influence of surface free energy and surface roughness on early plaque formation. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 17:1990;138-144.
87. Suzuki K., Aoki K., Ohya K. Effects of surface roughness of titanium implants on bone remodeling activity of femur in rabbits. Bone. 21:1997;507-514.
88. Carlsson L., Röstlund T., Albrektsson B., Albrektsson T. Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 3:1988;21-24.
89. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T., Andersson B., Krol J.J. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 6:1995;24-30.
90. Wennerberg A., Hallgren C., Johansson C., Danelli S. A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughnesses. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 9:1998;11-19.
91. Bobyn J.D., Pilliar R.M., Cameron H.U., Weatherby G.C. The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous coated metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clinical Orthopaedics. 150:1980;263-270.
92. Zablotsky M.H. Hydroxapatite coatings in implant dentistry. Implant Dentistry. 1:1992;253-257.
93. Lacefield W.R. Characterisation of hydroxylapatite coatings. Journal of Oral Implantology. 20:1994;214-220.
94. Lemmons J., Natiella J. Biomaterials, biocompability, and peri-implant considerations. Dental Clinics of North America. 30:1986;3-23.
95. Brunski J.B., Aquilante F.M., Pollack S.R., Korostof E., Trachtenberg D.I. The influence of functional use of endosseous dental implants on the tissue-implant interface. I. Histological aspects. Journal of Dental Research. 58:1979;1953-1969.
96. Goodman S., Wang J.-S., Doshi A., Aspenberg P. Difference in bone ingrowth after one versus two daily episodes of micromotion: experiments with titanium chambers in rabbits. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 27:1993;1419-1424.
97. LeGeros Z.R., Craig R.G. Strategies to affect bone remodelling: osseointegration. Journal of Bone Mineral Research. 8:1993;S583-S596.
98. Szmukler-Moncler S., Salama H., Reingewirtz Y., Dubruille J.H. Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 43:1998;192-203.
99. Kenwright J., Goodship A.E. Controlled mechanical stimulation in the treatment of tibial fractures. Clinical Orthopaedics. 241:1990;36-47.
100. Kenwright J., Richardson J.B., Cunningham J.L., White S.H., Goodship A.E., Adams M.A., Magnussen P.A., Newman J.H. Axial movement and tibial fractures. A controlled randomized trial of treatment. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 73:1991;654-659.
101. Pilliar R.M., Lee J.M., Maniatopoulos C. Observation of the effect of movement on the bone ingrowth into porous surfaced implants. Clinical Orthopaedics. 208:1986;108-113.