Evaluating the effectiveness of multiple open student models in EER-tutor

Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education: Enhancing and Sustaining New Knowledge Through the Use of Digital Technology in Education, ICCE 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 86-88

  Duan, Dandi ^a   Mitrovic, Antonija ^a   Churcher, Neville ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Constraint based tutors; Open student models

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT HIERARCHIES; CONCEPT MAPS; CONSTRAINT-BASED; CONTROL GROUPS; DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; EXPERIMENTAL GROUPS; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; METACOGNITIVES; OPEN STUDENT MODELS; POSITIVE EFFECTS; STUDENT MODELS;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; EDUCATION COMPUTING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84856885966     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Aleven, V., Koedinger, K.: Limitations of Student Control: Do Students Know When They Need Help? In Gauthier, G., Frasson, C., and VanLehn, K. (Eds.) Proc. ITS 2000, pp. 292-303 (2000).
2. Bull, S.: Supporting Learning with Open Learner Models. Proc. ICTE 2004, pp. 47-61 (2004).
3. Bull, S., Hghiem, T.: Helping Learners to Understand Themselves with a Learner Model Open to Students, Peers and Instructions. Proc. ITS 2002, pp 5-13 (2002).
4. Czarkowski, M., Kay, J., Potts, S.: Scrutability as a core interface element. In: C-K Looi, G. McCalla, B. Bredeweg, J. Breuker (Eds.) Proc. AIED 2005, IOS Press, pp. 783-785 (2005).
5. Cook, R., Kay, J.: The Justified User Model. Proc. UM 1994, pp 145-150 (1994).
6. Dimitrova, V.: StyLE-OLM: Interactive Open Learner Modelling. Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13 (1), 35-78 (2003).
7. Kay, J.: Learner Know Thyself: Student Models to Give Learner Control and Responsibility. In Halim, Z., Ottomann, T., Razak, Z. (Eds.) Proc. ICCE 1997, pp.17-24 (1997).
8. Mabbott, A., Bull, S.: Alternative Views on Knowledge: Presentation of Open Learner Models. Proc. ITS 2004, pp. 689-698. Springer-Verlag (2004).
9. Mabbott, A., Bull, S.: Student Preferences for Editing, Persuading and Negotiating the Open Learner Model. Proc. ITS 2006, pp.481-490 (2006).
10. Mabbott, A., Bull, S.: Comparing Student-Constructed Open Learner Model Presentations to the Domain. R. Luckin et al. (Eds.) Proc. AIED 2007, 281-288. IOS Press (2007).
11. Mitrovic, A., Martin, B.: Evaluating the Effect of Open Student Models on Self-assessment. Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17(2): 121-144 (2007).
12. Ohlsson, S.: Constraint-Based Student Modeling. Student Modeling: the Key to Individualized Knowledge-based Instruction, pp. 167-189, Springer-Verlag (1994).
13. Perez-Martin, D., Alfonseca, E., Rodriguez, P., Pascual-Nieto, I.: Automatic Generation of Students Conceptual Models from Answers in Plain Text. Proc. UM 2007, pp. 329-333, Springer-Verlag (2007).
14. Suraweera, P., Mitrovic, A.: KERMIT: A Constraint-Based Tutor for Database Modelling. In Cerri, S. A., Gouarderes, G., Paraguacu, F. (Eds.), Proc. ITS 2002, pp. 376-387, Springer-Verlag (2002).
15. Zakharov, K., Mitrovic, A., Ohlsson, S.: Feedback Micro-Engineering in EER-Tutor. In Looi, C.-K., McCalla, G., Bredeweg, B., Breuker, J. (Eds.) Proc. AIED 2005, pp. 718-725, IOS Press (2005).