The talent search model of gifted identification

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 45-59

  Assouline, Susan G ^a   Lupkowski Shoplik, Ann ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

above level testing; academic talent development; academic talent search; gifted identification

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856794113     PISSN: 07342829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0734282911433946     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Assouline S. G.,Colangelo N.,Ihrig D.,Forstadt L.Attributional choices for academic success and failure by intellectually gifted students.Gifted Child Quarterly. 2006;50:283-294.
2. Assouline S. G.,Lupkowski A. E.Talent development: Proceedings of the Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development. Colangelo N.Assouline S. G.Ambroson D., ed. New York, NY: Trillium Press; 1992:223-232.
3. Assouline S.,Lupkowski-Shoplik A.Developing math talent: A comprehensive guide to math education for gifted students in elementary and middle school. 2011). Developing math talent: A comprehensive guide to math education for gifted students in elementary and middle school (2nd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Waco, TX: Prufrock Press; 2011:.
4. Bartkovich K. G.,Mezynski K.Fast-paced precalculus mathematics for talented junior-high students: Two recent SMPY programs.Gifted Child Quarterly. 1981;25 (2): 73-78.
5. Benbow C. P.Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes.Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1988;11:169-232.
6. Benbow C. P.Handbook of gifted education. Colangelo N.Davis G. A., ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 1991:154-165.
7. Benbow C. P.Academic achievement in mathematics and science of students between ages 13 and 23: Are there differences among students in the top one percent of mathematical ability?.Journal of Educational Psychology. 1992;84 (1): 51-61.
8. Benbow C. P.,Lubinski D.Julian C. Stanley Jr. 1918-2005).American Psychologist. 2006;61:251-252.
9. Benbow C. P.,Stanley J. C.Inequity in equity: How equity can lead to inequity for high-potential students.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 1996;2:249-292.
10. Brody L. E.,Benbow C. P.Accelerative strategies: How effective are they for the gifted?.Gifted Child Quarterly. 1987;31:105-110.
11. Brody L. E.,Mills C. J.Talent search research: What have we learned?.High Ability Studies. 2005;16 (1): 97-111.
12. Planning and resource guide for EXPLORE test takers: Coordinator's version. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University School of Education & Social Policy; 2010:.
13. Cohn S. J.Handbook of gifted education. Colangelo N.Davis G. A., ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 1991:166-177.
14. Colangelo N.,Assouline S. G.,Gross M. U. M.A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students. Iowa City, IA: Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development; 2004:.
15. Colangelo N.,Assouline S. G.,Lu Talent development: Proceedings from the 1993 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development. Colangelo N.Assouline S. G.Ambroson D. A., ed. Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology Press; 1994:281-298.
16. Colangelo N.,Davis G. A.Handbook of gifted education. 2003). Introduction and overview. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.). Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 3-10). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Colangelo N.Davis G. A., ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 2003:3-10.
17. Csikszentmihalyi M.,Rathunde K.,Whalen S.Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1993:.
18. Ebmeier H.,Schmulbach S.An examination of the selection practices used in the talent search program.Gifted Child Quarterly. 1989;33:134-140.
19. George W. C.The talent search concept: An identification strategy for the intellectually gifted.Journal of Special Education. 1979;13:221-237.
20. Hoover H. D.,Dunbar S. B.,Frisbie D. A.,Oberley K. R.,Bray G. B.,Naylor R. J.,. . Qualls A. L.Iowa Tests of Basic Skills. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside; 2003:.
21. Kolitch E. R.,Brody L. E.Mathematics acceleration of highly talented students: An evaluation.Gifted Child Quarterly. 1992;36 (2): 78-85.
22. Lee S.-Y.,Matthews M. S.,Olszewski-Kubilius P.A national picture of talent search and talent search educational programs.Gifted Child Quarterly. 2008;52 (1): 55-69.
23. Lee S.-Y.,Olszewski-Kubilius P.Investigation of high school credit and placement for summer coursework taken outside of local schools.Gifted Child Quarterly. 2005;49 (1): 37-50.
24. Lohman D. F.,Hagen E. P.Cognitive Abilities Test. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside; 2001:.
25. Lubinski D.A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students. Colangelo N.Assouline S. G.Gross M. U.M., ed. Iowa City, IA: Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development; 2004:23-37.
26. Lubinski D.,Webb R. M.,Morelock M. J.,Benbow C. P.Top 1 in 10,000: A follow-up of the profoundly gifted.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2001;86:718-729.
27. Lupkowski-Shoplik A. E.The peak in the middle: Developing mathematically gifted students in the middle grades. Saul M.Assouline S.Sheffield L. J., ed. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics; 2010:29-50.
28. Lupkowski-Shoplik A. E.,Assouline S. G.Identifying mathematically talented elementary students: Using the lower level of the SSAT.Gifted Child Quarterly. 1993;37 (3): 118-123.
29. Lupkowski-Shoplik A.,Benbow C. P.,Assouline S. G.,Brody L. E.Handbook of gifted education. 2003). Talent searches: Meeting the needs of academically talented youth. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.). Handbook of gifted education (3rd. ed., pp. 204-218). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Colangelo N.Davis G. A., ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 2003:204-218.
30. Lupkowski-Shoplik A.,Swiatek M. A.Elementary Student Talent Searches: Establishing appropriate guidelines for qualifying test scores.Gifted Child Quarterly. 1999;43:265-272.
31. McNabb T.Handbook of gifted education. 2003). Motivational issues: Potential to performance. In ColangeloN.DavisG.A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 417-423). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Colangelo N.Davis G.A., ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 2003:417-423.
32. Mills C. J.,Ablard K. E.,Lynch S. J.Academically talented students' preparation for advanced-level coursework after an individually paced precalculus class.Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 1992;16:3-17.
33. Mills C. J.,Barnett L. B.The use of the Secondary School Admission Test (SSAT) to identify academically talented elementary school students.Gifted Child Quarterly. 1992;36:155-159.
34. Pre-K-grade 12 gifted programming standards. Washington, DC: Author; 2010:.
35. Olszewski-Kubilius P.A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students. Colangelo N.Assouline S. G.Gross M. U. M., ed. Iowa City, IA: Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development; 2004:69-76.
36. Olszewski-Kubilius P.,Kulieke M. J.,Willis G. B.,Krasney N.An analysis of the validity of SAT entrance scores for accelerated classes.Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 1989;13 (1): 37-54.
37. Olszewski-Kubilius P.,Lee S.-Y.How schools use talent search scores for gifted adolescents.Roeper Review. 2005;27:233-240.
38. Olszewski-Kubilius P.,Lee S.-Y.Gender and other group differences in performance on off-level tests: Changes in the 21st century.Gifted Child Quarterly. 2011;55 (1): 54-73.
39. Reis S. M.,Renzulli J. S.Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted & talented. 2009). The schoolwide enrichment model: A focus on student strengths and interests. In RenzulliJ. S.GubbinsE. J.McMillanK. S.EckertR. D.LittleC. A. (Eds.). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted & talented (2nd ed.). Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.Renzulli J. S.Gubbins E. J.McMillan K. S.Eckert R. D.Little C. A., ed. Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press; 2009:.
40. Renzulli J. S.,Gubbins E. J.,McMillan K. S.,Eckert R. D.,Little C. A.Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted & talented. 2009). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted & talented (2nd ed.). Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press; 2009:.
41. Rotigel J. V.,Lupkowski-Shoplik A.Using talent searches to identify and meet the educational needs of mathematically talented youngsters.School Science and Mathematics. 1999;99:330-337.
42. Stanley J. C.Leta Hollingworth's contributions to above-level testing of the gifted.Roeper Review. 1990;12:166-171.
43. Stanley J. C.Helping students learn only what they don't already know.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2000;6:216-222.
44. Stanley J. C.A quiet revolution: Finding boys and girls who reason exceptionally well mathematically and/or verbally and helping them get the supplemental educational opportunities they need.High Ability Studies. 2005;16 (1): 5-14.
45. Stanley J. C.,Benbow C. P.Using the SAT to find intellectually talented seventh graders.College Board Review. 1981;122:2 26-7 27.
46. Stanley J. C.,Benbow C. P.Conceptions of giftedness. Sternberg R. J.Davidson J. E., ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1986:362-387.
47. Stanley J. C.,Brody L. E.Comment about Ebmeier and Schmulbach's "An examination of the selection practices used in the talent search program.".Gifted Child Quarterly. 1989;33:142-143.
48. Stanley J. C.,Keating D. P.,Fox L.Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1974:.
49. Subotnik R. F.,Brody L. E.,Sheffield L.,Assouline S.. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Gifted Children; 2010Atlanta, GA; 2010.
50. Swiatek M. A.The talent search model past, present, and future.Gifted Child Quarterly. 2007;51:320-329.
51. Swiatek M. A.,Benbow C. P.A ten-year longitudinal follow-up of ability-matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students.Journal of Educational Psychology. 1991;83:528-538.
52. Swiatek M. A.,Benbow C. P.Nonacademic correlates of satisfaction with accelerative programs.Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 1992;21:699-723.
53. Swiatek M. A.,Lupkowski-Shoplik A.An evaluation of the elementary student talent search by families and schools.Gifted Child Quarterly. 2005;49:247-259.
54. Wood S.Best practices in counseling the gifted in schools.Gifted Child Quarterly. 2010;54 (1): 42-58.