An evaluation of the elementary student talent search by families and schools

Gifted Child Quarterly

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 247-259

  Swiatek, Mary Ann ^a   Lupkowski Shoplik, Ann ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23444442558     PISSN: 00169862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001698620504900306     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. ACT. (2001). EXPLORE technical manual. Iowa City, IA: Author.
2. Assouline, S. G., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (1997). Talent searches: A model for the discovery and development of academic talent. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 170-179). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
3. Assouline, S. G., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2003). Developing mathematical talent: A guide for challenging and educating gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
4. Benbow, C. P. (1992). Academic achievement in mathematics and science of students between ages 13 and 23: Are there differences among students in the top one percent of mathematical ability? Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 51-61.
5. Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., & Suchy, B. (1996). The impact of SMPY's educational programs from the perspective of the participant. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues (pp. 266-300). Baltimore. MI): Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. Benbow, C. P., Perkins, S., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Mathematics taught at a fast pace: A longitudinal evaluation of SMPY's first class. In C. P. Benbow & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Academic precocity: Aspects of its development (pp. 51-78). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7. Center for Talented Youth. (2000). Center for Talented Youth at Johns Hopkins University: Programs and related opportunities. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
8. Center for Talented Youth. (2003). Center for Talented Youth homepage. Retrieved April 25, 2005, from http://www.cty.jhu.edu
9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10. Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Lu, W.-H. (1994). Using EXPLORE as an above-level instrument in the search for elementary student talent. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development: Proceedings from the 1993 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 281-297). Dayton: Ohio Psychology Press.
11. Cox, J., Daniel, N., & Boston, B. O. (1985). Educating able learners: Programs and promising practices. Austin: University of Texas Press.
12. Feldhusen, J. F. (1989). Why the public schools will continue to neglect the gifted. Gifted Child Today, 12(2), 55-59.
13. Feldhusen, J. F. (1997). Secondary services, opportunities, and activities for talented youth. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 189-197). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
14. Fox, L. H. (1976). Identification and program planning: Models and methods. In D. P. Keating (Ed.), Intellectual talent: Research and development (pp. 32-54). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15. George, W. C. (1979). The talent-search concept: An identification strategy for the intellectually gifted. Journal of Special Education, 13, 221-237.
16. Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1994). The Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth: The first three decades of a planned 50-year study of intellectual talent. In R. F. Subotnik & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 255-281). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
17. Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. E., & Assouline, S. G. (1993). Identifying mathematically talented elementary students: Using the Lower Level of the SSAT. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 118-123.
18. Lupkowski-Shoplik, A., Benbow, C. P., Assouline, S. G., & Brody, L. E. (2003). Talent searches: Meeting the needs of academically talented youth. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis, Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 204-218). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
19. Lupkowski-Shoplik, A., & Kuhnel, A. (1995). Mathematics enrichment for talented elementary students: Carnegie Mellon University's summer enrichment program for mathematically talented students. Gifted Child Today, 18(4), 28-32.
20. Lupkowski-Shoplik, A., & Swiatek, M. A. (1999). Elementary student talent searches: Establishing appropriate guidelines for qualifying test scores. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 265-272.
21. McCarthy, C. R. (1998). Assimilating the talent search model into the school day. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9, 114-123.
22. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1998). Talent search: Purposes, rationale, and role in gifted education. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9, 106-113.
23. Schiever, S. W., & Maker, C. J. (1997). Enrichment and acceleration: An overview and new directions. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd edition, pp. 113-125). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
24. Southern, W. T., Jones, E. D., & Fiscus, E. D. (1989). Practitioner objections to the academic acceleration of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 29-35.
25. Stanley, J. C. (1976). Use of tests to discover talent. In D. P. Keating (Ed.), Intellectual talent: Research and development (pp. 3-22). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26. Stanley, J. C. (1977-78). The predictive value of the SAT for brilliant seventh- and eighth-graders. The College Board Review, 106, 31-37.
27. Swiatek, M. A., & Benbow, C. P. (1991). A 10-year longitudinal follow-up of participants in a fast-paced mathematics course. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 138-150.
28. Swiatek, M. A., &: Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2003). Elementary and middle school student participation in gifted programs: Are gifted students underserved? Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 118-130.
29. Talent Identification Program, Duke University. (1985). A guide to the talent search for local school personnel. Durham, NC: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 028 276)
30. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Prining Office. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 359 743)
31. Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1984). The talent search as an identification model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 172-176.
32. Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1996). Contributions of the talent-search concept to gifted education. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues (pp. 236-245). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
33. Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1998). A critique of the talent searches: Issues, problems, and possibilities. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9, 139-144.
34. Winner, E. (1997). Exceptionally high intelligence and schooling. American Psychologist, 52, 1070-1081.