Using Talent Searches to Identify and Meet the Educational Needs of Mathematically Talented Youngsters

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 99, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 330-337

  Rotigel, Jennifer V ^a   Lupkowski Shoplik, Ann ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002360059     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17492.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Archambault, F. X., Westberg, K.L., Brown, S., Hallmark, B. W., Zhang, W., & Emmons, C. (1993). Regular classroom practices with gifted students: Findings from the classroom practices survey Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 103–119.
2. Assouline, S. G., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (1997). Talent searches: A model for the discovery and development of academic talent In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed.) (pp. 170–179) Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
3. Brody, L. E. (1998). The talent searches: A catalyst for change in higher education The Journal for Secondary Gifted Education, 9(3), 124–133.
4. Cohn, S. (1991). Talent searches In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 166–177) Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
5. Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Lu, W. (1994). Using EXPLORE as above-level instrument in the search for elementary student talent In N. Colangelo, S. Assouline & D. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development (Vol. 2). Dayton : Ohio Psychology Press.
6. Lupkowski, A. E., & Assouline, S. G. (1992). Jane and Johnny love math: Recognizing and encouraging mathematical talent in elementary students Unionville, NY : Trillium.
7. Lupkowski, A. E., Assouline, S. G., & Vestal, J. (1992). Mentors in math Gifted Child Today, 15(3), 26–31.
8. Lupkowski-Shoplik, A., & Piskurich, P. J. (1998). EXPLORE score interpretation guide: 1998 Carnegie Mellon Elementary Student Talent Search Pittsburgh, PA : Carnegie Mellon University.
9. McCarthy, C. (1998). Assimilating the Talent Search Model into the school day The Journal for Secondary Gifted Education, 9(3), 114–123.
10. Miller, R., Mills, C., & Tangherlini, A. (1995). The Appalachia Model Mathematics program for gifted students Roeper Review, 18(2), 138–141.
11. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1998). Talent search: Purposes, rationale, and role in gifted education The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9(3), 106–113.
12. Robinson, N. S., & Robinson, H. B. (1982). The optimal match: Devising the best compromise for the highly gifted student In D. Feldman (Ed.), New directions for child development. Developmental approaches to giftedness and creativity, (No. 17) (pp. 79–94). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
13. Sawyer, R., & Brounstein, P. (April 1988). The relationship between SAT and ACT scores among academically talented seventh grade students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans.
14. Stanley, I. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1986). Youths who reason exceptionally well mathematically In R. I. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness, (pp. 361–387). New York : Cambridge University Press.
15. Swiatek, M. A. (1993). A decade of longitudinal research on academic acceleration through the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth Roeper Review, 15(3), 120–123.
16. U. S. Department of Education (1997). Mathematics equals opportunity. White Paper prepared for Secretary of Education Richard W. Riley. Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Education.
17. Van Tassel-Baska, J., Fields, I., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1997). Midwest Talent Search for Young Students: Planning and resource guide Evanston, IL : Center for Talent Development, Northwestern University.