Talent search research: What have we learned?

High Ability Studies

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 97-111

  Brody, Linda E ^a   Mills, Carol J ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22544464742     PISSN: 13598139     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13598130500115320     Document Type: Review

References (111)

1. Ablard, K. E. (1997a) Parents' conceptions of academic success: internal and external standards, The Journal of Secondary Education, 8(2), 57-64.
2. Ablard, K. E. (1997b) Self-perceptions and needs as a function of type of academic ability and gender, Roeper Review, 20, 110-115.
3. Ablard, K. E. (2004) The developmental study of talented youth (DSTY): six-year trends, Technical Report no. 31 (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Center for Talented Youth).
4. Ablard, K. E. & Parker, W. D. (1997) Parents' achievement goals and perfectionism in their academically talented children, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26, 651-667.
5. Ablard, K. E., Mills, C. J. & Hoffhines, V. L. (1996) The developmental study of talented youth (DSTY); the participants, Technical Report no. 13 (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Center for Talented Youth).
6. Ablard, K. E., Hoffhines, V. L. & Mills, C. J. (1998) The developmental study of talented youth (DSTY): sixth grade to ninth grade, Technical Report no. 19 (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Center for Talented Youth).
7. Achter, J. A., Lubinski, D. & Benbow, C. P. (1996) Multipotentiality among the intellectually gifted: "It was never there and already it's vanishing", Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(1), 65-76.
8. Achter, J. A., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P. & Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (1999) Assessing vocational preferences among gifted adolescents adds incremental validity to abilities: a discriminant analysis of educational outcomes over a 10-year interval, Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 777-786.
9. Barnett, L. B. & Durden, W. G. (1993) Education patterns of academically talented youth, Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(4), 161-168.
10. Barnett, L. B. & Juhasz, S. E. (2001) The Johns Hopkins University talent searches today, Gifted and Talented International, 16(2), 96-99.
11. Bartkovich, K. G. & Mezynski, K. (1981) Fast-paced precalculus mathematics for talented junior-high students: two recent SMPY programs, Gifted Child Quarterly, 25(2), 73-78.
12. Benbow, C. P. (1992) Academic achievement in mathematics and science of students between ages 13 and 23: are there differences among students in the top one percent of mathematical ability? Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 51-61.
13. Benbow, C. P. & Lubinski, D. (Eds) (1996) Intellectual talent (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press).
14. Benbow, C. P. & Stanley, J. C. (1980) Sex differences in mathematical ability: fact or artifact? Science, 210, 1262-1264.
15. Benbow, C. P. & Stanley, J. C. (Eds) (1983a) Academic precocity: aspects of its development (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press).
16. Benbow, C. P. & Stanley, J. C. (1983b) Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: more facts, Science, 222, 1029-1031.
17. Benbow, C. P. & Stanley, J. C. (1996) Inequity in equity: how equity can lead to inequity for high-potential students, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 249-292.
18. Boothe, D., Sethna, B. N., Stanley, J. C. & Colgate, S. D. (1999) Special opportunities for exceptionally able high school students: a description of eight early-college-entrance programs, Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 10, 195-202.
19. Brody, L. E. (1998) The talent searches: a catalyst for change in higher education, Journal for Secondary Gifted Education, 9(3), 124-133.
20. Brody, L. E. (Ed.) (2004a) Grouping and acceleration practices in gifted education, Essential readings in gifted education (Series Ed. S. M. Reis) (Thousand Oaks, CA, Corwin Press).
21. Brody, L. E. (2004b) Individualized educational plans, in: D. Boothe & J. C. Stanley (Eds) Critical issues for diversity in gifted education (Waco, TX, Prufrock Press).
22. Brody, L. E. & Benbow, C. P. (1986) Social and emotional adjustment of adolescents extremely talented in verbal or mathematical reasoning, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 15, 1-18.
23. Brody, L. E. & Benbow, C. P. (1987) Accelerative strategies: how effective are they for the gifted?, Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 105-110.
24. Brody, L. E. & Blackburn, C. C. (1996) Nurturing exceptional talent: SET as a legacy of SMPY, in: C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds) Intellectual talent (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press), 246-265.
25. Brody, L. E. & Fox, L. H. (1980) An accelerative intervention program for mathematically gifted girls, in: L. H. Fox, L. Brody & D. Tobin (Eds) Women and the mathematical mystique (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press), 164-178.
26. Brody, L. E. & Mills, C. J. (1997) Gifted children with learning disabilities: a review of the issues, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 282-296.
27. Brody, L. E. & Mills, C. J. (2004) Linking assessment and diagnosis to intervention for gifted students with learning disabilities, in: T. M. Newman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds) Students with both gifts and learning disabilities: identification, assessment, and outcomes (New York, Kluwer Academic), 73-94.
28. Brody, L. E. & Stanley, J. C. (1991) Young college students: assessing factors that contribute to success, in: W. T. Southern & E. D. Jones (Eds) The academic achievement of gifted children (New York, Teachers College Press).
29. Brody, L. E., Lupkowski, A. E. & Stanley, J. C. (1988) Early entrance to college: a study of the academic and social adjustment during the freshman year, College and University, 63(4), 347-359.
30. Brody, L. E., Barnett, L. B. & Mills, C. J. (1994) Gender differences among talented adolescents: research studies by SMPY and CTY at the Johns Hopkins University, in: K. A. Heller & E. A. Hany (Eds) Competence and responsibility: proceedings of the Third Conference of the European Council for High Ability (Seattle, WA, Hogrefe & Huber), 204-210.
31. Brody, L. E., Muratori, M. C. & Stanley, J. C. (2004) Early entrance to college: academic, social, and emotional considerations, in: N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline & M. U. M. Gross (Eds) A nation deceived: how schools hold back America's brightest students (Vol.II) (Iowa City, IA, University of Iowa), 97-107.
32. Burton, N. W. (1988) Survey II: test-taking history for 1980-81 young SAT-takers (New York, College Board).
33. Center for Talented Youth (2001) CTY-Goldman Sachs scholars program annual report (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins Center for Talented Youth).
34. Center for Talented Youth (2002a) CTY-Goldman Sachs scholars program annual report (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins Center for Talented Youth).
35. Center for Talented Youth (2002b) Parents' values and children's perceived pressure, Topical Research Series 4 (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins Center for Talented Youth).
36. Center for Talented Youth (2003) CTY-Goldman Sachs scholars program annual report (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins Center for Talented Youth).
37. Durden, W. G. (1980) The Johns Hopkins program for verbally talented youth, Roeper Review, 2(3), 34-47.
38. Durden, W. G. & Mills, C. J. (1993) Talent derailed: the education establishment's assault on ability grouping, Wisconsin Interest, 2(1), 43-50.
39. Durden, W. G. & Tangherlini, A. E. (1993) Smart kids: how academic talents are developed and nurtured in America (Seattle, WA, Hogrefe & Huber).
40. Ebmeier, H. & Schmulbach, S. (1989) An examination of the selection practices used in the talent search program, Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 134-143.
41. Fox, L. H. (1974) A mathematics program for fostering precocious achievement, in: J. C. Stanley, D. Keating & L. H. Fox (Eds) Mathematical talent: discovery, description and development (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press), 101-125.
42. Fox, L. H., Tobin, D. & Brody, L. E. (1979) Sex role socialization and achievement in mathematics, in: M. A. Wittig & A. C. Petersen (Eds) Sex-related differences in cognitive functioning (New York, Academic Press).
43. Fox, L. H., Brody, L. & Tobin, D. (Eds) (1980) Women and the mathematical mystique (Baltimore, 7MD, Johns Hopkins University Press).
44. Fox, L. H., Brody, L. & Tobin, D. (Eds) (1983) Learning disabled/gifted children: identification and programming (Austin, TX, Pro-Ed).
45. Fox, L. H., Brody, L. E. & Tobin, D. (1985) The impact of intervention programs upon course-taking and attitudes in high school, in: S. F. Chipman, L. R. Brush & D. M. Wilson (Eds) Women and mathematics: balancing the equation (Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
46. George, W. C., Cohn, S. J. & Stanley, J. C. (Eds) (1979) Educating the gifted: acceleration and enrichment (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press).
47. Gustin, W. C. & Corazza, L. (1994) Mathematical and verbal reasoners as predictors of science achievement, Gifted Child Today, 6, 160-162.
48. Hoffmann, J. & Mills, C. (1998) Student perception questionnaire, CTY Internal Evaluation Report (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Center for Talented Youth).
49. Keating, D. P. (Ed.) (1976) Intellectual talent: research and development (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press).
50. Keating, D. P. & Stanley, J. C. (1972) Extreme measures for the exceptionally gifted in mathematics and science, Educational Researcher, 1(9), 3-7.
51. Kolitch, E. R. & Brody, L. E. (1992) Mathematics acceleration of highly talented students: an evaluation, Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2), 78-85.
52. Lubinski, D. & Benbow, C. P. (1992) Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted: implications for the math/science pipeline, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 61-66.
53. Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., Shea, D. L., Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. & Halvorson, M. B. J. (2001a) Men and women at promise for scientific excellence: similarity not dissimilarity, Psychological Science, 12 (4), 309-317.
54. Lubinski, D., Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J. & Benbow, C. P. (2001b) Top 1 in 10,000: a follow-up of the profoundly gifted, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 718-729.
55. Lupkowski-Shoplik, A., Benbow, C. P., Assouline, S. G. & Brody, L. E. (2003) Talent searches: meeting the needs of academically talented youth, in: N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds) Handbook of gifted education (Boston, MA, Allyn & Bacon), 204-218.
56. Lynch, S. J. (1990) Fast-paced science for the academically talented: issues of age and competence, Science Education, 74(6), 585-596.
57. Lynch, S. J. & Mills, C. J. (1993) Identifying and preparing disadvantaged minority youth for high level academic achievement, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 66-76.
58. Mills, C. J. (1992) Personality, gender, and academic ability, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Hilton Head, SC.
59. Mills, C. J. (1993) Personality, learning style and cognitive style profiles of mathematically talented students, European Journal for High Ability, 4, 70-85.
60. Mills, C. J. (1997) Gender differences in math/science achievement: the role of personality variables, paper presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the Eastern Educational Association, Hilton Head, SC.
61. Mills, C. J. & Ablard, K. E. (1993) Credit and placement for academically talented students following special summer courses in math and science, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17, 4-25.
62. Mills, C. J. & Brody, L. E. (2002) The doubly exceptional child: a principal's dilemma, Streamlined Seminar, 20(4), 1-2.
63. Mills, C. J. & Durden, W. G. (1992) Cooperative learning and ability grouping: an issue of choice, Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 11-16.
64. Mills, C. J. & Parker, W. D. (1998) Cognitive-psychological profiles of gifted adolescents from Ireland and the U.S.: cross-societal comparisons, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(1), 1-16.
65. Mills, C. J. & Tangherlini, A. E. (1992) Finding the optimal match: another look at ability grouping and cooperative learning, Equity and Excellence, 25(2-4), 205-208.
66. Mills, C. J., Ablard, K. E. & Lynch, S. J. (1992a) Academically talented students' preparation for advanced-level coursework after an individually-paced precalculus class, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 3-17.
67. Mills, C. J., Stork, E. J. & Krug, D. (1992b) Recognition and development of academic talent in educationally disadvantaged students, Exceptionality, 3, 165-180.
68. Mills, C. J., Ablard, K. E. & Stumpf, H. (1993) Gender differences in academically talented young students' mathematical reasoning: patterns across age and subskills, Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(2), 340-346.
69. Mills, C. J., Ablard, K. E. & Gustin, W. C. (1994) Academically talented students' achievement in a flexibly paced mathematics program, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 495-511.
70. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (1998) Talent search: purposes, rationale, and role in gifted education, The Journal for Secondary Gifted Education, 9(3), 106-113.
71. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2004) Talent search: purposes, rationale, and role in gifted education, in: D. Boothe & J. C. Stanley (Eds) In the eyes of the beholder: critical issues for diversity in gifted education (Waco, TX, Prufrock Press), 251-262.
72. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. & Grant, B. (1996) Academically talented women and mathematics: the role of special programs and support from others in acceleration, achievement, and aspiration, in: K. D. Noble & R. F. Subotnik (Eds) Remarkable women: perspectives on female talent development (Cresskill, NJ, Hampton Press), 281-294.
73. Olszewski-Kubiliius, P. & Yasumoto, J. (1995) Factors affecting the academic choices of academically talented middle school students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18(3), 298-318.
74. Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Kulieke, M. J., Willis, G. B. & Krasney, N. (1989) An analysis of the validity of SAT entrance scores for accelerated classes, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13(1), 37-54.
75. Parker, W. D. (1996) Psychological adjustment in mathematically gifted students, Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 154-157.
76. Parker, W. D. & Mills, C. J. (1996) The incidence of perfectionism in gifted students, Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 194-199.
77. Robinson, N. M., Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W. & Busse, J. (1996) The structure of abilities in math-precocious young children: gender similarities and differences, Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 341-352.
78. Robinson, N. S. & Robinson, H. B. (1982) The optimal match: devising the best compromise for the highly gifted student, in: D. Feldman (Ed.) New directions for child development-developmental approaches to giftedness and creativity (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass), 79-94.
79. Schmidt, D. B., Lubinski, D. & Benbow, C. P. (1998) Validity of assessing educational-vocational preference dimensions among intellectually talented 13-year olds, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(4), 436-453.
80. Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D. & Benbow, C. P. (2001) The importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: a 20-year longitudinal study, Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 604-614.
81. Stanley, J. C. (1973) Accelerating the educational progress of intellectually gifted youths, Educational Psychologist, 10(3), 133-145.
82. Stanley, J. C. (1976a) Concern for intellectually talented youths: how it originated and fluctuated, Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 5(3), 38-42.
83. Stanley, J. C. (1976b) Tests better finder of great math talent than teachers are, American Psychologist, 31 (4), 313-314.
84. Stanley, J. C. (1976c) The case for extreme educational acceleration of intellectually brilliant youths, Gifted Child Quarterly, 20(1), 66-75.
85. Stanley, J. C. (1976d) The student gifted in mathematics and science, NASSP Bulletin, 60(398), 28-37.
86. Stanley, J. C. (1977/1978) The predictive value of the SAT for brilliant seventh- and eighth-graders, The College Board Review, no. 106, 31-37.
87. Stanley, J. C. (1978) Radical acceleration: recent educational innovation at JHU, Gifted Child Quarterly, XXII(1), 62-67.
88. Stanley, J. C. (1979) The study and facilitation of mathematics, in: A. H. Passow (Ed.) The gifted and the talented: their education and development, The 78th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press), 189-185.
89. Stanley, J. C. (1985) How did six highly accelerated gifted students fare in graduate school? Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(4), 180.
90. Stanley, J. C. (1991) A better model for residential high schools for talented youths, Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 471-473.
91. Stanley, J. C. (1994) Gender differences for able elementary school students on above-grade-level ability and achievement tests, in: N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline & D. L. Ambroson (Eds) Talent development: proceedings from the 1993 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace national research symposium on talent development (Dayton, OH, Ohio Psychology Press), 141-148.
92. Stanley, J. C. (1996) In the beginning: the study of mathematically precocious youth, in: C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds) Intellectual talent (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press), 225-235.
93. Stanley, J. C. (2000) Helping students learn only what they don't already know, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6(1), 216-222.
94. Stanley, J. C. & Benbow, C. P. (1981) Using the SAT to find intellectually talented seventh graders, The College Board Review, no. 122, 2-7 & 26-27.
95. Stanley, J. C. & Benbow, C. P. (1982) Educating mathematically precocious youths: twelve policy recommendations, Educational Researcher, 11(5), 4-9.
96. Stanley, J. C. & Benbow, C. P. (1983) Intellectually talented students: the key is curricular flexibility, in: S. Paris, G. Olson & H. Stevenson (Eds) Learning and motivation in the classroom (Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum), 259-281.
97. Stanley, J. C. & George, W. C. (1978) Now we are six: the ever-expanding SMPY. G/C/T, 1(1), 9-11, 43-44 & 50-51.
98. Stanley, J. C. & George, W. C. (1980) SMPY's ever-increasing D, Gifted Child Quarterly, 24(1), 41-48.
99. Stanley, J. C. & Stanley, B. S. K. (1986) High school biology, chemistry, or physics learned well in three weeks, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 237-250.
100. Stanley, J. C., Keating, D. P. & Fox, L. H. (Eds) (1974) Mathematical talent: discovery, description, and development (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press).
101. Stanley, J. C., George, W. C. & Solano, C. H. (Eds) (1977) The gifted and the creative: a fifty-year perspective (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press).
102. Stanley, J. C., Benbow, C. P., Brody, L. E., Dauber, S. & Lupkowski, A. (1992) Gender differences on eighty-six nationally standardized aptitude and achievement tests, in: N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline & D. L. Ambroson (Eds) Talent development: proceedings from the Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace national research symposium on talent development (Unionville, NY, Trillium).
103. Stocking, V. B. & Goldstein, D. (1992) Course-selection and performance of very high ability students: is there a gender gap? Roeper Review, 15(1), 48-51.
104. Stumpf, H. (1993) Performance factors and gender-related differences in spatial ability: another assessment, Memory and Cognition, 21(6), 828-836.
105. Stumpf, H. & Stanley, J. C. (1996) Gender-related differences on the College Board's advanced placement and achievement tests, 1982-1992, Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 353-364.
106. Stumpf, H. & Stanley, J. C. (1997) The gender gap in Advanced Placement computer science, The College Board Review, no. 181, 22-27.
107. Swiatek, M. A. & Benbow, C. P. (1991) Ten year longitudinal follow-up of ability-matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 528-538.
108. Terman, L. M. (1925) Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children, in: Genetic studies of genius (Vol.1) (Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press).
109. VanTassel-Baska, J. L. (1989) Profiles of precocity: a three year study of talented adolescents, in: J. L. VanTassel-Baska & P. Olszewski-Kubilius (Eds) Patterns of influence on gifted learners (New York, Teachers College Press), 29-39.
110. Wendler, C., Ninneman, A. & Feigenbaum, M. (2001) Evaluating the appropriateness of the SAT-I: reasoning test for seventh and eighth graders, College Board Research Notes RN-12 (New York, The College Board).
111. Wilder, G. & Casserly, P. L. (1988) Survey I: young SAT-takers and their parents (New York College Board).