Revisiting the concept "dialogue" in public relations

Public Relations Review

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 5-13

  Theunissen, Petra ^a   Wan Noordin, Wan Norbani ^a  

^a AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Dialogue; Public relations; Risk; Two way symmetric communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856633214     PISSN: 03638111     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bokeno R.M., Gantt V.W. Dialogic mentoring. Management Communication Quarterly 2000, 14(2):237-270.
2. Bortree D.S., Seltzer T. Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups' Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review 2009, 35:317-319. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.05.002.
3. Briones R.L., Kuch B., Fisher Liu B., Jin Y. Keeping up with the digital age: How the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships. Public Relations Review 2011, 37:37-43. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.006.
4. Cissna K.N., Anderson R. The 1957 Martin Buber-Carl Rogers Dialogue, as dialogue. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 1994, 34(11):10-45. 10.1177/00221678940341003.
5. Cissna K.N., Anderson R. Theorizing about dialogic moments; The Buber-Rogers position and postmodern themes. Communication Theory 1998, 8(1):63-104. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00211.x.
6. Duffy M.E. There's no two-way symmetric about it: A postmodern examination of public relations textbooks. Critical Studies in Media Communication 2000, 17(September (3)):294-315. 10.1080/15295030009388397.
7. Fawkes J. Public relations models and persuasion ethics: A new approach. Journal of Communication Management 2007, 11(4):313-331. 10.1108/13632540710843922.
8. Gordon J., Berhow S. University websites and dialogic features for building relationships with potential students. Public Relations Review 2009, 35:150-152. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.11.003.
9. Grunig J.E. Paradigms of global public relations in an age of digitilization. PRism 2009, 6(2):1-19. Retrieved from:. http://praxis.massey.ac.nz/prism_on-line_journ.html.
10. Grunig J.E., Grunig L.A., Dozier A.M. Excellent public relations and effective organizations: A study of communication management in three countries 2002, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
11. Grunig J.E., Hunt T. Managing public relations 1984, Thomson, Belmont, CA.
12. Heath R.L., Pearce W.B., Shotter J., Taylor J.R., Kersten A., Zorn T., et al. The processes of dialogue. Management Communication Quarterly 2006, 19(February (3)):341-345. 10.1177/0893318905282208.
13. Henderson A., Bowley R. Authentic dialogue? The role of "friendship" in a social media recruitment campaign. Journal of Communication Management 2010, 14(3):237-257. 10.1108/13632541011064517.
14. Heylighen F., Joslyn C. Cybernetics and second-order cybernetics. Encyclopedia of physical science & technology 2001, 1-24. Academic Press, New York. R.A. Meyers (Ed.).
15. Holtzhausen D. Postmodern values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research 2000, 12(1):93-114. 10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00131-5.
16. Jun S., Jung J. A cross-cultural study of the world wide web and public relations. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 2005, 10(1):24-40. 10.1108/13563280510578187.
17. Kelleher T. Public relations online-lasting concepts for changing media 2007, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
18. Kent M.L., Taylor M. Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review 2002, 28(1):21-37. 10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00108-X.
19. Kögler H.H. The power of dialogue. Critical hermeunitics after Gadamer and Foucalt 1999, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, (translated by P. Hendrickson).
20. Lattimore D., Baskin O., Aronoff C. 2004, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. 5th ed.
21. Ledingham J.A., Bruning S.D. Relationship management in public relations: Dimensions of an organization-public relationship. Public Relations Review 1998, 24(1):55-65. 10.1016/S0363-8111(98)80020-9.
22. Leeper R.V. Moral objectivity. Jurgen Habermas's discourse ethics, and public relations. Public Relations Review 1996, 22(2):133-150. 10.1016/S0363-8111(96)90003-X.
23. Leitch S., Neilson D. Bringing publics into public relations: New theoretical frameworks for practice. Handbook of public relations 2001, 127-138. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. R.L. Heath (Ed.).
24. L'Etang J. Public relations: Concepts, practice and critique 2008, Sage Publishers, London.
25. McAllister-Spooner S.M. Fulfilling the dialogic promise: A ten-year reflective survey on dialogic Internet principles. Public Relations Review 2009, 35(3):320-322. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.03.008.
26. McAllister S.M., Taylor M. Community college website as tools for fostering dialogue. Public Relations Review 2007, 33(2):230-232. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.02.017.
27. Mersham G.M., Skinner C. New insights into communication and public relations 1999, Heinemann, Johannesburg.
28. Mersham G., Theunissen P., Peart J. Public relations and communication management. An Aotearoa/New Zealand perspective 2009, Pearson, North Shore, NZ.
29. Mifsud M.L., Johnson S.D. Dialogic, dialectic, and rhetoric: Exploring human dialogue across discipline. Southern Communication Journal 2000, 65(2/3):91-104.
30. Moroco L.J. Unconventional dialogic distinctions between Buber and Bakhtin. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NCA 94th annual convention, TBA 2008, Retrieved from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p258682_index.html (online PDF).
31. Pearson, R. A. (1989). A theory of public relations. Unpublished Dissertation. Ohio University.
32. Penman R., Turnbull S. From listening...into the dialogical space at the radical centre. Paper presented at the ANZCA 2010 conference on media, democracy and change 2010.
33. Podnar K., Golob U. Reconstruction of public relations history through publications in Public Opinion Quarterly. Journal of Communication Management 2009, 13(1):55-76. 10.1108/13632540910931391.
34. Roper J., Zorn T., Weaver C.K. Science dialogues: The communicative properties of science and technology dialogue. A project for the Ministry of Research, Science and Technology Hamilton 2004, Department of Management Communication, University of Waikato, New Zealand.
35. Rybalko S., Seltzer T. Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: How Fortune 500 companies engage stakeholders using Twitter. Public Relations Review 2010, 36:336-341. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.08.004.
36. Saunders H.H. A public peace process. Sustained dialogue to transform racial and ethnic conflicts 1999, St. Martin's Press, New York.
37. Seidl D., Becker K.H. Niklas Luhman and organization studies 2005, Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press, Kristianstad, Sweden.
38. Stoker K.L., Tusinski K.A. Reconsider public relations' infatuation with dialogue: Why engagement and reconciliation can be more ethical than symmetry and reciprocity. Journal of Mass Media 2006, 27(2-3):156-176. 10.1207/s15327728jmme2102&3_5.
39. Taylor M., Kent M.L., White W. How activist organizations are using the Internet to build relationships. Public Relations Review 2001, 27(3):263-284. 10.1016/S0363-8111(01)00086-8.
40. Toth E.L. The case for pluralistic studies of public relations: Rhetorical, critical and systems perspectives. Rhetorical and critical approaches to public relations 1992, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., New Jersey. E. Toth, R.L. Heath (Eds.).
41. Tymson C., Lazar P., Lazar R. The New Australian and New Zealand public relations manual 2006, Tymson Communications Pty Ltd., Chatswood.
42. Yang S., Kang M., Johnson P. Effects of narratives, openness to dialogic communication, and credibility on engagement in crisis communication through organizational blogs. Communication Research 2010, 37(4):473-497. 10.1177/0093650210362682.