Dialogic, dialectic, and rhetoric: Exploring human dialogue across the discipline

Southern Communication Journal

Volumn 65, Issue 2-3, 2000, Pages 91-104

  Mifsud, Mari Lee ^a   Johnson, Scott D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346558775     PISSN: 1041794X     EISSN: 19303203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10417940009373160     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Adelman, M., & Frey, L R. (1997). The fragile community: Living together with AIDS. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Adler, R. B., Rosenfeld, L. B., Towne, N., & Proctor, R. F. II, (1998). Interplay: The process of interpersonal communication (7, h ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace.
3. Altman, I., Vinsel, A, & Brown, B. (1981). Dialectic concepuons in social psychology: An application to social penetration and privacy regulation. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 107-160). New York: Academic Press.
4. Anderson, R., & Cissna, K. N. (1996). Criticism and conversational texts: Rhetorical bases of role, audience and style in the Buber-Rogers dialogue. Human Studies, 19, 85-118.
5. Anderson, R., Cissna, K. N., & Arnett, R. A. (Eds.) (1994). The reach of dialogue: Confirmation voice, and community. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
6. Arnett, R. (1986). Communication and community: Implications of Martin Buber's dialogue. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
7. Arnett, R. (1992). Dialogic education: Conversation about ideas and between people. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
8. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin. (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
9. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Eds.; V. McGee, trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
10. Barker, L. L., & Edwards, R. (1980). Intrapersonal communication. Dubuque, IA: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
11. Baxter, L. A. (1988). A dialectical perspective on communication strategies in relationship development. In S. W. Duck, D. F. Hay, S. E. Hobfoll, W. Iches, & B. Montgomery (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 257-273). London: Wiley.
12. Baxter, L. A. (1990). Dialectical contradictions in relational development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 69-88.
13. Baxter, L. A. (1993). The social side of personal relationships: A dialectical perspective. In S. Duck (Ed.), Understanding relationship processes: Social context and relationships (vol. 3, pp. 139-165). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Baxter, L. A. (1994). A dialogic approach to relationship maintenance. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 233-254). San Diego: Academic Press.
15. Baxter, L. A., & Goldsmith, D. (1990). Cultural terms for communication events among some American high school adolescents. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54, 377-394.
16. Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues & dialectics. New York: Guilford.
17. Benson, J. K. (1977). Organizations: A dialectical view. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22,1-21.
18. Benson, T. W. (1989). Rhetoric as a way of being. In T. W. Benson (Ed.), American rhetoric: Context and criticism. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
19. Bialostosky, D. H. (1995). Antilogies, dialogics, and sophistic social psychology: Michael Billig's reinvention of Bakhtin from Protagorean rhetoric. In S. Mailloux (Ed.), Rhetoric, sophistry, pragmatism (pp. 82-93). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Billig, M. (1997). The dialogic unconscious: Psycho-analysis, discursive psychology, and the nature of repression. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36,139-159.
21. Billig, M. (1998). Rhetoric and the unconscious. Argumentation, 12, 199-216.
22. Blake, R. H., & Haroldsen, E. O. (1975). A taxonomy of concepts in communication. New York: Hastings House.
23. Bochner, A. P., & Eisenberg, E. (1987). Family process: System perspectives. In C. R. Berger & S. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of communication science, (pp. 540-563). Beverly Hills: Sage.
24. Bopp, M. J., & Weeks, G. R. (1984). Dialectical metatheory in family therapy. Family Process, 23, 49-61.
25. Brummett, B. (1976). Some implications of "process' or "intersubjectivity": Postmodern rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 9, 21-51.
26. Buber, M. (1947). Between man and man (R. G. Smith, Trans.). London: K. Paul.
27. Buber, M. (1952). I and Thou (R. G. Smith, Trans.). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
28. Buber, M. (1965). The knowledge of man (M. Friedman & R. G. Smith, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.
29. Burke, K. (1966). Language as symbolic action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30. Burke, K. (1969). Rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31. Burks, D. M. (1970). Persuasion, self-persuasion, and rhetorical discourse. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 3, 109-119.
32. Cissna, K. N., & Anderson, R. (1994). Communication and the ground of dialogue. In R. Anderson, K. N. Cissna, & R. C. Arnett (Eds.), The reach of dialogue: Confirmation, voice, and community (pp. 9-30). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
33. Cissna, K. N., & Anderson, R. (1998). Theorizing about dialogic moments: The Buber-Rogers position and postmodern themes. Communication Theory, 8, 62-104.
34. Clair, R. P., & Kunkel, A. W. (1998). "Unrealistic realities": Child abuse and the aesthetic resolution. Communication Monographs, 65, 24-46.
35. Condit, C. M. (1990). The birth of understanding: Chaste science and the harlot of the arts. Communication Monographs, 57, 323-327.
36. Conville, R. L. (1991). Relational transitions: The evolution of personal relationships. New York: Praeger.
37. Craig, R. T. (1990). The speech tradition. Communication Monographs, 57, 309-314.
38. Crowley, S. (1989). A plea for the revival of sophistry. Rhetoric Review, 7, 318-333.
39. Enos, T. (Ed.). (1990). Polylog: Professing the new rhetorics. Rhetoric Review, 9, 5-35.
40. Fish, S. (1989). Doing what comes naturally: Change, rhetoric, and the practice of theory in literary and legal studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
41. Glenn, C. (1997). Rhetoric retold: Regendering tradition from Antiquity through the Renaissance. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
42. Goldsmith, D. (1990). A dialectical perspective on the expression of autonomy and connection in romantic relationships. Western Journal of Speech, 54, 537-556.
43. Goodnight, G. T. (1993). A "new rhetoric" for a "new dialectic": Prolegomena to responsible public argument. Argumentation, 7, 329-342.
44. Griffin, E. (1997). A first look at communication theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
45. Hegel, G. W. F. (1929). The science of logic (W. H. Johnston & L. G. Struthers, Trans.). New York: Macmillan. (Original work published 1812-1816.)
46. Hegel, G. W. F. (1931). The phenomenology of mind (J. B. Bailie, Trans; revised 2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan. (Original work published 1807.)
47. Hikins, J. W. (1989). Intrapersonal discourse and its relationship to human communication: Rhetorical dimensions of self-talk. In C. V. Roberts & K. W. Watson, Eds., Intrapersonal communication processes: Original essays. Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
48. Isocrates (1928). Antidosis (G. Norlin, trans.). London: William Heinemann.
49. Johannesen, R. L. (1971). The emerging concept of communication as dialogue. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 57, 373-382.
50. Johnson, S. D., & Long, L. (forthcoming). "Being apart and being a part": Dialectic and the small group. In L. Frey (Ed.), New directions in group communication. Beverly Hills: Sage.
51. Johnstone, H. W. (1965). Some reflections on argumentation. In M. Natanson & H. W. Johnstone (Eds.), Philosophy, rhetoric, and argumentation (pp. 1-9). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
52. Johnstone, H. W. (1970). The problem of the self University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
53. Johnstone, H. W. (1978). Validity and rhetoric in philosophical argument: An outlook in transition. University Park: The Dialogue Press of Man and World.
54. Johnstone, H. W. (1990). Rhetoric as a wedge: A reformulation. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 20, 333-338.
55. Johnstone, H. W., & Mifsud, M. L. (1999). Rhetoric as wedge and bridge: A note on the rhetoric of identification and distinction. Rhetoric Society Quarterly. 29,75-78.
56. Kahn, C. H. (1979). The art and thought of Heraclitus. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. Kellett, P. M. (1999). Dialogue and dialectics in managing organizational change: The case of a mission-based transformation. Southern Communication Journal, 64, 211-232.
58. Kennedy, G. (1994). A new history of classical rhetoric. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
59. Lanham, R. (1976). The motives of eloquence. New Haven: Yale University Press.
60. Marx, K. (1906). Capital (Vol. 1) (S. Moore & E. Aveling, Trans.). Chicago: Charles H. Kerr & Co. (Original work published in 1867.)
61. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62. Mifsud, M. L. (1998). On the idea of reflexive rhetoric in Homer. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 31, 41-54.
63. Montgomery, B. M. (1992). Communication as the interface between couples and culture. In S. Dcctz (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 15 (pp. 475-507). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
64. Montgomery, B. M. (1993). Relationship maintenance versus relationship change: A dialectical dilemma. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 205-224.
65. Montgomery, B. M., & Baxter, L. A. (Eds.) (1998). Dialectical apfrroaches to studying personal relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66. Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, Trans.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
67. Plato (1987). Sophist. (H. N. Fowler, trans.). Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
68. Plato. (1990). Phaedrus. (G. P. Goold, trans.). Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
69. Poulakos, J. (1974). The components of dialogue. Western Speech, 38,199-212.
70. Poulakos, J. (1995). Sophistical rhetoric in classical Greece. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
71. Rawlins, W. (1983a). Negotiating close friendships: The dialectic of conjunctive freedoms. Human Communication Research, 9,255-266.
72. Rawlins, W., (1983b). Openness as problematic in ongoing friendships: Two conversational dilemmas. Communication Monographs, 50,1-13.
73. Rawlins, W. (1989). A dialectical analysis of the tensions, functions, and strategic challenges of communica-don in young adult friendships. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 12 (pp.157-189). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
74. Rawlins, W. (1992). Friendship matters: Communication, dialectics, and the life course. New York: Aldinc de Gruytcr.
75. Rawlins, W. (1998). Writing about "Friendship Matters": A case study in dialectical and dialogical inquiry. In B. M. Montgomery & L. A. Baxter (Eds.), Dialectical approaches to studying personal relationships (pp. 63-82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
76. Roberts, C. V., Edwards, R., & Barker, L. L. (1987). Intrapersonal communication processes. Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
77. Rogers, W. (1984). Communication in action: Building speech competencies. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
78. Schuster, C. (1985). Mikhail Bakhtin as rhetorical theorist. College English, 47, 594-607.
79. Scott, R. (1973). On not defining "rhetoric." Philosophy and Rhetoric, 6, 85-96.
80. Smith, C. (1998). Rhetoric and human consciousness. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.
81. Smith, R. C., & Turner, P. K. (1995). A social constructionist reconfiguration of metaphor analysis: An application of "SMCA" to organizational socialization theory. Communication Monographs, 62, 152-181.
82. Stewart, J. (1978). Foundations of dialogic communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 64, 183-201.
83. Stewart, J. (1999). Bridges not walls: A book about interpersonal communication (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
84. Vocate, D. (Ed.) (1994). Intrapersonal communication: Different voices, different minds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
85. Walton, D. N., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (1995). Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts in interpersonal reasoning. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
86. Williams, H. (1989). Hegel, Heraclitus, and Marx's dialectic. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.