Clinical performance of a nanofilled resin composite with and without an intermediary layer of flowable composite: A 2-year evaluation

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 147-153

  Stefanski, Sebastian ^a   van Dijken, Jan W V ^b  

^a Public Dental Health Service Strömsund   (Sweden)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bonding; Clinical; Flowable; Nanofiller; Posterior tooth; Sandwich

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; FILTEK FLOW; FILTEK SUPREME; FLOWABLE HYBRID COMPOSITE; NANOCOMPOSITE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCOTCHBOND; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CARIES SUSCEPTIBILITY; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NANOCOMPOSITES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855960491     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0485-8     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Andersson-Wenckert I, van Dijken JWV, Kieri C (2004) The durability of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after six years. Am J Dent 17: 43-50.
2. Attar N, Turgut MD, Güngör HC (2004) The effect of flowable resin composites as gingival increments on the microleakage of posterior resin composites. Oper Dent 29: 162-167.
3. Braga RR, Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL (2003) Contraction stress of flowable composite materials and their efficacy as stress-relieving layers. J Am Dent Assoc 134: 721-728.
4. Cadenaro M, Marchesi G, Antoniolli F, Davidsson C, De Stefano DE, Breschi L (2009) Flowability of composites is no guarantee for contraction stress reduction. Dent Mater 25: 649-654.
5. Cetin AR, Unlu N (2009) One-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. Dent Mater J 28: 620-626.
6. Chan DCN, Browning W, Frazier KB, Brackett W, Brackett M (2005) Two-year clinical evaluation of InTen-S low shrinkage composite resin. J Dent Res 84 (Special issue A), Abstract 581.
7. Chuang S-F, Jin Y-T, Liu J-K, Chang C-H, Shieh D-B (2004) Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on class II composite restorations. Oper Dent 29: 301-308.
8. Da Cunha Mello FS, Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL (1997) Sealing ability of eight resin bonding systems in a class II restoration after mechanical fatiguing. Dent Mater 13: 372-376.
9. van Dijken JWV (1999) Longevity of new hybrid restorative materials in class III cavities. Eur J Oral Sci 107: 115-219.
10. van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P (1987) Marginal adaptation of composite resin restorations placed with or without intermediate low-viscous resin. An SEM investigation. Acta Odontol Scand 45: 115-123.
11. van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P (1987) Effect of the use of rubber-dam on marginal adaptation of composite fillings placed with the acid etch technique. Acta Odontol Scand 45: 303-308.
12. van Dijken JWV, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K (2003) A two-year clinical evaluation of a new calcium aluminate cement in class II cavities. Acta Odontol Scand 61: 235-240.
13. van Dijken JWV, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K (2005) A four-year clinical evaluation of a highly filled hybrid resin composite in class II cavities. J Adhes Dent 7: 343-349.
14. van Dijken JWV, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K (2006) Fiber-reinforced packable resin composites in class II cavities. J Dent 34: 763-769.
15. van Dijken JWV, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K, Lindberg A (2007) Clinical long term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation. Dent Mater 23: 1101-1107.
16. van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U (2008) Long term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 24: 915-922.
17. van Dijken JWV, Lindberg A (2009) Clinical effectiveness of a low shrinkage resin composite. A five-year study. J Adhes Dent 11: 143-148.
18. Dresch W, Volpato S, Gomes JC, Ribeiro NR, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2006) Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled composite in posterior teeth: 12-month evaluation. Oper Dent 31: 409-417.
19. Efes B, Dörter C, Gömeç Y, Koray F (2006) Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer and nanofill composite with and without a flowable liner. J Adhes Dent 8: 119-126.
20. Ernst CP, Cortain G, Spohn M, Rippin G, Willerhausen B (2002) Marginal integrity of different resin-based composites for posterior teeth: an in vitro dye-penetration study on eight resin-composite and compomer-/adhesive combinations with a particular look at the additional use of flow-composites. Dent Mater 18: 351-358.
21. Ernst CP, Canbek K, Aksogan K, Willerhausen B (2003) Two-year clinical performance of packable posterior composite with and without a flowable composite liner. Clin Oral Investig 7: 129-134.
22. Ernst CP, Brandenbusch M, Meyer G, Canbek K, Gottschalk B, Willerhausen B (2006) Two-year clinical performance of a nanofiller vs a fine-particle hybrid resin composite. Clin Oral Investig 10: 119-125.
23. Fabianelli A, Goracci C, Ferrari M (2003) Sealing ability of packable resin composites in class II restorations. J Adhes Dent 5: 217-223.
24. Ferdianakis K (1998) Microleakage reduction from newer esthetic restorative materials in permanent molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 22: 221-229.
25. Isokangas P, Alanen P, Tiekso J (1993) The clinician's ability to identify caries risk subjects without saliva tests-a pilot study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 21: 8-10.
26. Jain P, Belcher M (2000) Microleakage of class II resin-based composite restorations with flowable composite in the proximal box. Am J Dent 13: 235-238.
27. Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N (2007) Effect of flowable composite lining on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 9: 189-194.
28. Kubo S, Yakota H, Hayashi Y (2004) Microleakage of cervical cavities restored with flowable composites. Am J Dent 17: 33-37.
29. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y (2003) Effect of low viscosity resin-based composite on the microleakage of cervical restorations. Am J Dent 16: 244-248.
30. Labella R, Lambrechts P, van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G (1999) Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 15: 128-137.
31. Lindberg A, van Dijken JWV, Lindberg M (2003) A 3 year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in class II cavities. Am J Dent 15(16): 33-36.
32. Lopes LG, Cefaly DFG, Franco EB, Mondelli RFL, Lauris JRF, Navarro MFL (2003) Clinical evaluation of two "packable" posterior composite resins: two-year results. Clin Oral Investig 7: 123-128.
33. Mahmoud SH, El-Embaby AE, AbdAllah AM, Hamama HH (2008) Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer, nanohybrid and nanofill composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Adhes Dent 10: 315-322.
34. Malmström H, Schlueter M, Roach T, Moss ME (2002) Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations. Oper Dent 27: 373-380.
35. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN (2003) An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 134: 1382-1390.
36. Neme AL, Maxson BB, Pink FE, Aksu MN (2002) Microleakage of class II packable resin composites lined with flowables: an in vitro study. Oper Dent 27: 600-605.
37. Palaniappan S, Bharadwaj D, Mattar DL, Peumans M, van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P (2009) Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite. Dent Mater 25: 1302-1314.
38. Perdigão J, Anauate-Netto C, Carmo ARP, Hodges JS, Cordeiro HJD, Lewgoy HR, Dutra-Correa M, Castillhos N, Amore R (2004) The effect of adhesive and flowable composite on postoperative sensitivity: 2-week results. Quintessence Int 35: 777-784.
39. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E (2002) Composite restorations: influence of flowable and self-curing resin composite linings on microleakage in vitro. Oper Dent 27: 569-575.
40. Poon ECM, Smales RJ, Vip KHK (2005) Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid posterior resin-based composites. Results at 3. 5 years. J Am Dent Assoc 136: 1533-1540.
41. Seppä L, Hausen H, Pöllänen L, Helasharju K, Karkkainen S (1989) Past caries recording made in public dental clinics as predictors of caries prevalence in early adolescence. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 17: 277-281.
42. Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K, van Dijken JWV, Funegårdh U, Lindberg A, Nilsson M (2009) Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in public dental health clinics in northern Sweden. J Dent 37: 673-678.
43. Unterbrink GL, Liebenberg WH (1999) Flowable resin composites as filled adhesives: literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int 30: 249-257.
44. Ölmez A, Öztas N, Bodur H (2004) The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. Oper Dent 29: 713-719.