Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on class II composite restorations

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 301-308

  Chuang, S F ^a,b,c   Jin, Y T ^b   Liu, J K ^a   Chang, C H ^b   Shieh, D B ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NONE   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLOW; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMMERSION; IN VITRO STUDY; MOLAR TOOTH; POLYMERIZATION; POROSITY; RANK SUM TEST; REPARATIVE DENTISTRY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; THICKNESS; TOOTH FILLING;

EID: 2942606392     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alster D, Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Mol A & Davidson CL (1992) The dependence of shrinkage stress reduction on porosity concentration in thin resin layers Journal of Dental Research 71(9) 1619-1622.
2. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, Stamatiades P & Wilkerson M (1998) A characterization of first-generation flowable composites Journal of the American Dental Association 129(5) 567-577.
3. Brackett WW & Covey DA (2000) Resistance to condensation of "condensable" resin composites as evaluated by a mechanical test Operative Dentistry 25(5) 424-426.
4. Chuang SF, Liu JK & Jin YT (2001) Microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations with flowable composite linings Operative Dentistry 26(2) 193-200.
5. Cobb DS, MacGregor KM, Vargas MA & Denehy GE (2000) The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin-based composites: A comparison Journal of the American Dental Association 131(11) 1610-1615.
6. Davidson CL & Feilzer AJ (1997) Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives Journal of Dentistry 25(6) 435-440.
7. Dietschi D, De Siebenthal G, Neveu-Rosenstand L & Holz J (1995) Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: An in vitro evaluation Quintessence International 26(10) 717-727.
8. Geurtsen W & Schoeler U (1997) A 4-year retrospective clinical study of Class I and Class II composite restorations Journal of Dentistry 25(3-4) 229-232.
9. Hansen EK & Asmussen E (1989) Marginal adaptation of posterior resins: Effect of dentin-bonding agent and hygroscopic expansion Dental Materials 5(2) 122-126.
10. Hattab FN, Mok NY & Agnew EC (1989) Artificially formed carieslike lesions around restorative materials Journal of the American Dental Association 118(2) 193-197.
11. Jackson RD & Morgan M (2000) The new posterior resins and a simplified placement technique Journal of the American Dental Association 131(3) 375-383.
12. Kemp-Scholte CM & Davidson CL (1990) Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restoration effected by increased flexibility Journal of Dental Research 69(6) 1240-1243.
13. Krejci I, Besek M & Lutz F (1994) Clinical and SEM study of Tetric resin composite in posterior teeth: 12 month results American Journal of Dentistry 7(1) 27-30.
14. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B & Vanherle G (1999) Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives Dental Materials 15(2) 128-137.
15. Leevailoj C, Cochran MA, Matis BA, Moore BK & Platt JA (2001) Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners Operative Dentistry 26(3) 302-307.
16. Leinfelder KF (1995) Posterior composite resins: The materials and their clinical performance Journal of the American Dental Association 126(5) 663-672.
17. Neme AM, Maxson BB, Pink FE & Aksu MN (2002) Microleakage of Class II packable resin composites lined with flowables: An in vitro study Operative Dentistry 27(6) 600-605.
18. Opdam NJM, Roeters JJM, Peters TCRB, Burgersdijk RCW & Teunis M (1996) Cavity wall adaptation and voids in adhesive Class I resin composite restorations Dental Materials 12(4) 230-235.
19. Opdam NJ, Feilzer AJ, Roeters JJ & Smale I (1998a) Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: In vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage American Journal of Dentistry 11(5) 229-234.
20. Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ & Smale I (1998b) A radiographic and scanning electron microscopic study of approximal margins of Class II resin composite restorations placed in vivo Journal of Dentistry 26(4) 319-327.
21. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M & Carvalho RM (1995) Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: A review Dental Materials 11(2) 117-125.
22. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Asscherickx K, Simon S, Abe Y, Lambrechts P & Vanherle G (2001) Do condensable composites help to achieve better proximal contacts? Dental Materials 17(6) 533-541.
23. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Kawai K & Tsuchitani Y (1995) Effect of particle variation on wear rates of posterior composites American Journal of Dentistry 8(4) 173-178.
24. Thonemann BM, Federlin M, Schmalz G & Hiller KA (1997) SEM analysis of marginal expansion and gap formation in Class II composite restorations Dental Materials 13(3) 192-197.
25. Wibowo G & Stockton L (2001) Microleakage of Class II composite restorations American Journal of Dentistry 14(3) 177-185.