Effect of flowable composite lining on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 189-194

  Korkmaz, Yonca ^a   Ozel, Emre ^b   Attar, Nuray ^c  

^a BASKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b YEDITEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Composite; Flowable; Microleakage; Void

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; POROSITY; TOOTH DISEASE;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; POROSITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 34248161566     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aboushala A, Kugel G, Hurley E. Class II composite resin restorations using glass-ionomer liners: microleakage studies. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1996;21:67-70.
2. Ajlouni R, Bishara SE, Soliman MM, Oonsombat C, Laffoon JF, Warren J. The use of Ormocer as an alternative material for bonding orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2005;75:106-108.
3. Alomari QD, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB. Effect of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations. Oper Dent 2001;26:406-411.
4. Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Flow, strength, stiffness and radiopacity of flowable resin composites. J Can Dent Assoc 2003;69:516-521.
5. Attar N, Turgut MD, Gungor HC. The effect of flowable resin composites as gingival increments on the microleakage of posterior resin composites. Oper Dent 2004; 29:162-167.
6. Baseren M. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures. J Biomater Appl 2004;19:121-134.
7. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:567-577.
8. Bedran de Castro AK, Pimenta LA, Amaral CM, Ambrosano GM. Evaluation of microleakage in cervical margins various posterior restorative systems. J Esthet Rester Dent 2002;14:107-114.
9. Belli S, Inokoshi S, Ozer F, Pereira PN, Ogata M, Tagami J. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations. Oper Dent 2001;26:70-75.
10. Brackett WW, Covey DA. Resistance to condensation of 'condensable' resin composites as evaluated by a mechanical test. Oper Dent 2000;25:424-426.
11. Chuang SF, Jin YT, Liu JK, Chang CH, Shieh DB. Influence of flowable composite lining on Class II composite restorations. Oper Dent 2004:29:301-308.
12. Chuang SF, Liu JK, Chao CC, Liao FP, Chen YH. Effects of flowable composite liningand operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:177-183.
13. Cobb DS, MacGregor KM, Vargas MA, Denehy GE. The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin-based composites: a comparison. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:1610-1615.
14. Condon JR, Ferracane JL Reduction of composite contraction stress through non-bonded microfilier particles. Dent Mater 1998;14:256-260.
15. Dietschi D, Scampa U, Campanile G, Holz J. Marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect Class II composite resin restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Quintessence Int 1995;26:127-138.
16. Ferdianakis K. Microleakage reduction from newer esthetic restorative materials in permanent molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998;22:221-229.
17. Fusayama T. Indications for self-cured and light-cured adhesive composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:46-51.
18. Jain P, Belcher M. Microleakage of Class II resin-based composite restorations with flowable composite in the proximal box. Am J Dent 2000;13:235-238.
19. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990: 69: 1240-1243.
20. Leevailoj C, Cochran MA, Matis BA, Moore BK, Platt JA. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners. Oper Dent 2001;26:302-307.
21. Mjör IA. The location of clinically diagnosed secondary caries. Quintessence Int 1998;29:313-317.
22. Nash RW, Lowe RA, Leinfelder K. Using packable composites for direct posterior placement. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:1099-1104.
23. Neme AM, Maxson BB, Pink FE, Aksu MN. Microleakage of Class II packable resin composites lined with flowables: an in vitro study. Oper Dent 2002;27:600-605.
24. Olmez A, Oztas N, Bodur H. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. Oper Dent 2004;29:713-719.
25. Opham NJ, Roeters JJ, Peters TC, Burgersdijk RC, Teunis M. Cavity wall adaptation and voids in adhesive Class I resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 1996;12:230-235.
26. Payne JH 4th. The marginal seal of Class II Restorations: Flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1999; 23:123-130.
27. Peris AR, Duarte S Jr, de Andrade MF. Evaluation of marginal microleakage in class II cavities: effect of microhybrid, flowable and compactable resins. Quintessence Int 2003;34:93-98.
28. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Curtis JW Jr. Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure of resin composite. Oper Dent 1994;19:26-32.
29. Schwartz RS, Summitt JB, Robbins JW. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996:141-186.
30. Tredwin CJ, Stokes A, Moles DR. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites. Oper Dent 2005;30:32-38.
31. Tung FF, Estafan D, Scherer W. Microleakage of condensable resin composite: an in vitro investigetion. Quintessence Int 2000;31:430-434.
32. van Dijken JW, Horstedt P, Waern R. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities. Am J Dent 1998;11:165-172.