A four-year clinical evaluation of a highly filled hybrid resin composite in posterior cavities

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 343-349

  Van Dijken, Jan W V ^a   Sunnegårdh Grönberg, Karin ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cement; Ceramic; Clinical; Composite resin; Dental restorations

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM DERIVATIVE; CALCIUM ALUMINATE; CALCIUM DERIVATIVE; RESIN; TETRIC CERAM; TOOTH CEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALUMINUM COMPOUNDS; BICUSPID; CALCIUM COMPOUNDS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; ROOT CANAL THERAPY; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 30044445227     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA. 2 year clinical evaluation of Class I posterior composites. Am J Dent 1996;9:150-154.
2. Andersson-Wenckert I, van Dijken JWV, Kieri C. The durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after six years. Am J Dent 2004;17:43-50.
3. Bader JD, Martin JA, Shugars DA. Preliminary estimates of the incidence and consequences of tooth fracture. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:1650-1654.
4. Bader JD, Martin JA, Shugars DA. Incidences rates for complete cusp fracture. Community Oral Epidemiol 2001;29:346-353.
5. Brunthaler A, König F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Invest 2003;7:63-70.
6. Cavel WT, Kelsey WP, Blankeneau RJ. An in vivo study of cuspal fracture. J Prosth Dent 1985;53:38-42.
7. Dijken van JWV. A clincial evaluation of anterior conventional, microfiller and hybrid composite resin fillings. A six year follow up study. Acta Odontol Scand 1986;44:357-367.
8. Dijken van JWV. A six year follow-up of three dental alloy restorations with different copper contents. Swed Dent J 1991;15:259-264.
9. Dijken van JWV, Kieri C, Carlén M. Longevity of extensive Class II open sandwich restorations with a resin- modified GIC-composite. J Dent Res 1999;78:1319-1325.
10. Dijken van JWV. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J Dent 2000;28:299-306.
11. Dijken van JWV. Three-year performance of a calcium-, fluoride- and hydroxyl ions releasing resin composite. Acta Odontol Scand 2002;60:155-159.
12. Dijken van JWV, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K. A two-year clinical evaluation of a new calcium aluminate cement in Class II cavities. Acta Odontol Scand 2003;61:235-240.
13. Dijken van JWV. A 6-year clinical evaluation Class I poly-acid modified resin composite/resin composite laminate and resin composite restorations cured with a two-step curing technique. Dent Mater 2003;19:423-428.
14. El-Mowafy OM, Lewis DW, Benmergui C, Levinton C. Meta-analysis on long-term clinical performance of posterior composite restorations. J Dent 1994;22:33-43.
15. Ernst C-P, Martin M, Stuff S, Willerhausen B. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for posterior teeth after three years. Clin Oral Invest 2001;5:148-155.
16. Fennis WMM, Kuijs RH, Kreulen CM, Roeters FJM, Creugers NHJ, Burgersdijk RCW. A survey of cusp fractures in a population of general dental practices. Int J Prosthod 2002;15:559-563.
17. Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:185-194.
18. Geurtsen W, Schoeler U. A 4-year retrospective clinical study of Class I and Class II composite restorations. J Dent 1997;25:229-232.
19. Heft MW, Gregg HG, Dolan TA, Foerster U. Restoration fractures, cusp fractures and root fragments in a diverse sample of adults: 24 month incidence. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:1459-1464.
20. Hickel R, Petschelt A, Maier J, Voß A, Sauter M. Nachuntersuchung von Füllungen mit Cermet-Zement (Ketac-Silver). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1988;43:851-853.
21. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:45-64.
22. Hugo B, Stassinakis A, Hofmann N, Hausmann P, Kleiber B. In-vivo-Untersuchung von kleinen Klasse-II-Kompositfüllungen. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2001;111:11-18.
23. Isokangas P, Alanen P, Tiekso J. The clinician's ability to identify caries risk subjects without saliva tests - a pilot study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993;21:8-10.
24. Jokstad A, Mjör IA, Qvist V. The age of restorations in situ. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52:234-242.
25. Krämer N, Kunzelmann KH, Pollety T, Pelka M, Hickel R. Langzeiterfahrungen mit Cermet-Zermetfüllungen in Klasse-I/II Kavitäten. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1994;49:905-909.
26. Köhler B, Rasmussen C-G, Ödman P. A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations. J Dent 2000;28:111-116.
27. Lindberg A, van Dijken JWV, Lindberg M. A 3 year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in class II cavities. Am J Dent 2003;15:16:33-36.
28. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Rodrigues Filho LE, Busato AL. One year clinical evaluation of posterior packable resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2001;26:427-434.
29. Lopes LG, Cefaly DFG, Franco EB, Mondelli RFL, Lauris JRP, Navarro MFL. Clinical evaluation of two "packable" posterior composite resins. Clin Oral Invest 2002;6:79-83.
30. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hickel R. The suitability of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations. J Amer Dent Assoc 2001;132:639-645.
31. Manhart J, Kunzelman K-H, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2000;16:33-40.
32. Manhart J, Neuerer P, Schiebenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Hickel R. Three-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosth Dent 2000;84:289-296.
33. Oberländer H, Hiller K-A, Thonemann B, Schmalz G. Clinical evaluation of packable composite resins in Class-II restorations. Clin Oral Invest 2001;5:102-107.
34. Opdam NJM, Loomans BAC, Roeters FJM, Bronkhorst EM. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students. J Dent 2004;32:379-383.
35. Pallesen U, van Dijken JWV. Plastrestaureringar - för og efter år 2000. In: Hjörting-Hansen E (ed). Odontologi 2000. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 2000:39-53.
36. Pallesen U, Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Invest 2003;7:71-79.
37. Panitvisai P, Messer HH. Cuspal deflection in molars in relation to endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 1995;21:57-61.
38. Perry RD, Kugel G. Two-year clinical evaluation of a high-density posterior restorative material. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2000;21:1067-1072.
39. Perry RD, Kugel G, Habib CM, McGarry P, Settembrini L. A two-year clinical evaluation of TPH for restoration of Class II carious lesions in permanent teeth. Gen Dent 1997;45:344-349.
40. Rees JS. The role of cuspal flexure in the development of abfraction lesions: A finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:1028-1032.
41. Schedle A, Franz A, Rausch-Fan X, Spittler A, Lucas T, Samorapoompichit P, et al. Cytotoxic effects of dental composites, adhesive substances, compomers and cements. Dent Mater 1998;14:429-440.
42. Schiebenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Manhart J, Kremers L, Kunzelman K-H, Hickel R. Two-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosth Dent 1999;82:391-397.
43. Schmalz G, Garhammer P. Biological interactions of dental cast alloys with oral tissues. Dent Mater 2002;18;396-406.
44. Schoch M, Krämer N, Frankenberger R, Petschelt A. Direct posterior composite restorations with a new adhesive system: One-year results. J Adhes Dent 1999;2:167-173.
45. Seppä L, Hausen H, Pöllänen L, Helasharju K, Karkkainen S. Past caries recording made in public dental clinics as predictors of caries prevalence in early adolescence. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1989;17:277-281.
46. Siegel S. Non parametric statistics forthe Behavioural Sciences. New York: Mc Graw-Hill, 1956.
47. Smales RJ, Gerke DC, White IL. Clinical evaluation of occlusal glass ionomer, resin composite, and amalgam restorations. J Dent 1990;18:243-249.
48. Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K, Peutzfeldt A, van Dijken JWV. Hardness and in vitro wear of a novel ceramic restorative cement. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110:175-178.
49. Türkün S, Aktenar BO. Twenty-four-month clinical evaluation of different posterior composite resin materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:196-203.
50. Van Meerbeek B, Inoue S, Perdigâo J, Lambrechts P, Van Herle G. Enamel and dentin adhesives. In: Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Schwartz RS (eds). Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry, a contemporary approach. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing, 2001:178-235.
51. Wilson MA, Cowan AJ, Randall RC, Crisp RJ, Wilson NHF. A practice-based, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a new resin composite restorative: one-year results. Oper Dent 2002;27:423-429.
52. Wucher M, Grobler SR, Senekal PJC. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a composite and a compomer/composite (sandwich) in Class II restorations. Am J Dent 2002;15:274-278.
53. Örtengren U, Andreasson H, Karlsson S, Meding B, Barregård L. Prevalence of self-reported hand eczema and skin symptoms associated with dental materials among Swedish dentists. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107:496-505.